Love how the racist, left wing trolls here change their views constantly on what is an acceptable "race" barrier. Brown, white, black.... based simply on political affiliation of the group.
What would happen if people were to actually say these things below - that are based on actual ideological stances and events - out loud? I don't think anyone here actually holds these opinions or knows anything about the events if they do hold them, but it's pretty clear based on media coverage that they expect some people do actually hold them.
"If people from Mexico vote Republican, they're not brown but white. If they vote Democrat they are brown.
If people who are black vote Republican they are not black.
If people come over the southern border, they're brown, even if their skin is white. Doesn't matter if they are from Europe, the Middle East, China, Mexico, South America, or Somalia. UNLESS they vote Republican and come over the border legally because they are a skilled tradesman seeking to naturalize. Then they are white supremacists or favored by white supremacists.
If people are for the war in Ukraine, which is white against white (as far as today's leftist definition is concerned), they aren't racist or bigoted. If they are against it they are white supremacists and Russian disinfo.
If people are against terrorism by Palestinians and think it's ok for people to defend themselves against it, then they are racist. If they are for terrorists attacking people due to their race, then they are not racists.
If they are against violence against blacks, they're fine. If they're against violence against whites, they're racists.
If people are against racial violence against whites, they're racists, while "black lives matter" can be for violence against whites and they're not racist. And "all lives" can't "matter" because that's clearly anti-"black lives matter," so anyone declaring that is also racist.
Yet only those that are already alive matter and not those not yet born, but those with life, senses and emotions don't matter even if they are black, brown or white.. But those who were not born during and never experienced slavery, and whose ancestors may actually have owned slaves, are somehow worth more than those who also weren't born and never experienced
slavery but whose ancestors weren't here during slavery and/or never owned slaves somehow owe them money, even if their ancestors were black or brown, or were slaves themselves on another continent.
Guns are OK to own, but not to carry, unless you're a criminal or rich. They're really only for hunting and not for self-defense, even if the person who commits a crime against you has one. You should be prosecuted rigorously for defending yourself, your family, and your property especially with a gun, unless you are a criminal in which case you should be released immediately without bail and unmonitored, even if you're a former felon not allowed to carry a gun.
If you fraudulently obtain 5M dollars and instigate billions in damage across the country and loss of life, you can get a slap on the wrist if a Democrat and you give a 30sec apology. If you "trespass" on public property while security opens the door for you and ushers you into room after room, you should be prosecuted as if you committed a felony attempt on someone's life, if you're not a Democrat.
If you bomb a federal building, shoot up a concert, bar, or softball game, assault an official or law enforcement officer, stab a fellow student, set fire to a city or an entire subdivision, but you're not a Republican or conservative, you're mostly peaceful and we'll give you money and bury your story. If you smile at a Native American Democrat that initiated a conflict with you, you're a racist and deserve to have your life destroyed in national media for a month.
"A man consensually coming on to a woman is misogynistic and disgusting, unless its done in the oval office by a Democrat. Being naked and performing sexual acts in a parade is fine if you're not straight. A man claiming to be a woman can enter a women's shower and get aroused in front of them, stare at them, and even assault them, but they have a right to be there.
Believe a woman when she says she's been assaulted, as long as she wasn't assaulted by a Democrat, even if she has proof.
A racist is immediately a racist when accused, and a racist who tells you they are racist when found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of a "hate crime" is not a racist simply based on the color of their skin and their political affiliation. A white person in blackface is bad, unless they are a Democrat."
When you say all of these conflicting stupidities out loud it really becomes crystal clear that there's no reasoning with anyone that can take these positions. They are not about reason but rage and hatred of whatever and whoever gets in the way of their money and power. It's just about greed and that's all, just as the founders of blm and the Democrat party have proven to us.
What would happen if people were to actually say these things below - that are based on actual ideological stances and events - out loud? I don't think anyone here actually holds these opinions or knows anything about the events if they do hold them, but it's pretty clear based on media coverage that they expect some people do actually hold them.
"If people from Mexico vote Republican, they're not brown but white. If they vote Democrat they are brown.
If people who are black vote Republican they are not black.
If people come over the southern border, they're brown, even if their skin is white. Doesn't matter if they are from Europe, the Middle East, China, Mexico, South America, or Somalia. UNLESS they vote Republican and come over the border legally because they are a skilled tradesman seeking to naturalize. Then they are white supremacists or favored by white supremacists.
If people are for the war in Ukraine, which is white against white (as far as today's leftist definition is concerned), they aren't racist or bigoted. If they are against it they are white supremacists and Russian disinfo.
If people are against terrorism by Palestinians and think it's ok for people to defend themselves against it, then they are racist. If they are for terrorists attacking people due to their race, then they are not racists.
If they are against violence against blacks, they're fine. If they're against violence against whites, they're racists.
If people are against racial violence against whites, they're racists, while "black lives matter" can be for violence against whites and they're not racist. And "all lives" can't "matter" because that's clearly anti-"black lives matter," so anyone declaring that is also racist.
Yet only those that are already alive matter and not those not yet born, but those with life, senses and emotions don't matter even if they are black, brown or white.. But those who were not born during and never experienced slavery, and whose ancestors may actually have owned slaves, are somehow worth more than those who also weren't born and never experienced
slavery but whose ancestors weren't here during slavery and/or never owned slaves somehow owe them money, even if their ancestors were black or brown, or were slaves themselves on another continent.
Guns are OK to own, but not to carry, unless you're a criminal or rich. They're really only for hunting and not for self-defense, even if the person who commits a crime against you has one. You should be prosecuted rigorously for defending yourself, your family, and your property especially with a gun, unless you are a criminal in which case you should be released immediately without bail and unmonitored, even if you're a former felon not allowed to carry a gun.
If you fraudulently obtain 5M dollars and instigate billions in damage across the country and loss of life, you can get a slap on the wrist if a Democrat and you give a 30sec apology. If you "trespass" on public property while security opens the door for you and ushers you into room after room, you should be prosecuted as if you committed a felony attempt on someone's life, if you're not a Democrat.
If you bomb a federal building, shoot up a concert, bar, or softball game, assault an official or law enforcement officer, stab a fellow student, set fire to a city or an entire subdivision, but you're not a Republican or conservative, you're mostly peaceful and we'll give you money and bury your story. If you smile at a Native American Democrat that initiated a conflict with you, you're a racist and deserve to have your life destroyed in national media for a month.
"A man consensually coming on to a woman is misogynistic and disgusting, unless its done in the oval office by a Democrat. Being naked and performing sexual acts in a parade is fine if you're not straight. A man claiming to be a woman can enter a women's shower and get aroused in front of them, stare at them, and even assault them, but they have a right to be there.
Believe a woman when she says she's been assaulted, as long as she wasn't assaulted by a Democrat, even if she has proof.
A racist is immediately a racist when accused, and a racist who tells you they are racist when found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of a "hate crime" is not a racist simply based on the color of their skin and their political affiliation. A white person in blackface is bad, unless they are a Democrat."
When you say all of these conflicting stupidities out loud it really becomes crystal clear that there's no reasoning with anyone that can take these positions. They are not about reason but rage and hatred of whatever and whoever gets in the way of their money and power. It's just about greed and that's all, just as the founders of blm and the Democrat party have proven to us.
