POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Could be... I read somewhere that it was a high performance camera for motion capable of that. My .5 second google search tells me by wikipedia high speed cameras are 1/1000, which is the real question, was he using especially capable equipment he otherwise woudln't have been.
He's just like our old friend Dion. I guarantee you there's not a single substantive difference between them, and there's not much air between them and our "other" posters here.
The media and dems are manufacturing this psychosis intentionally.
This aged well. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
The camera he used according to a search is as I stated. 30FPS. Normal for a photographers camera. You are mixing shutter speed (allowing light in) to frames or photos captured per second. Why he was shooting "wide-open" at 1/8000 shutter speed is a different issue. POTUS was standing still so the light issue from the shutter is a question for him. He was getting 30FPS and just got lucky.
Absolutely. Get rid of all of them.
Of course this is true, but imagine thinking that even 30 years ago it wasn’t.
i would like to know to what extent the medicaid cuts are to be. i’m all for eliminating fraud in such programs wherever it’s found, but some services in medicaid affect some of our most truly needy citizens. what immediately comes to mind are people who require nursing home care but their only resource is medicaid, which is already a hard process.
i have first hand experience with trying to get a family member into a nursing home via medicaid and it ain’t easy.
Obviously unwilling or unable to get a 'real' job, they pivot to politics where it's not a prerequisite to be smart or competent.
These fired federal employees are considering running for public office
'It's forced a choice': Fired federal workers prepare to run for office. Democratic groups want to help.www.usatoday.com
If Trump has to hire back DOE employees, then just reassign them per the famous last line on a job description: "other requirements as needed".....have them go around and clean the monuments and memorials.
We are rapidly losing any semblance of our government because of this judicial overreach and the Supreme Court and Congress are 100% letting it happen.
Federal judge blocks Trump admin moves to dismantle Dept of Education
Judge Myong Joun halted President Donald Trump's mass firing at the Department of Education on Thursday, ordering the reinstatement of all employees.www.foxnews.com
Trump will just tell that judge to pound sand, and wait for SCOTUS to (hopefully) tell him to go away.
Trump administration says Harvard has lost their 'Student and Exchange Visitor Program. certification.'
I'm sure some little district judge will have something to say about this:
Noem: "It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enroll foreign students and benefit from their higher tuition payments to help pad their multibillion-dollar endowments. Harvard had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing. It refused.
They have lost their Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification as a result of their failure to adhere to the law.
Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country."
I'm sure some little district judge will have something to say about this:
Noem: "It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enroll foreign students and benefit from their higher tuition payments to help pad their multibillion-dollar endowments. Harvard had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing. It refused.
They have lost their Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification as a result of their failure to adhere to the law.
Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country."
Last edited:
These Federal district judges are like a pack of Chihuahua's; just ignore them, or kick them away. They are essentially powerless when it comes to Executive Actions. I don't know why this administration is even listening to them.
Do you run away when a Chihuahua charges you? Of course not. You kick it in the face or just pick it up, and dump it in a trash can like that kid did to Timmy Lupus in Bad News Bears.
Do you run away when a Chihuahua charges you? Of course not. You kick it in the face or just pick it up, and dump it in a trash can like that kid did to Timmy Lupus in Bad News Bears.
You can catch it all in Kaplan's new book 'Chihuahuas are a bunch of b-tches'
Shoulda used the bike lane!
Rand Paul a hard no on House GOP’s ‘big, beautiful bill’
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has told Senate GOP leadership that he is a hard no on the bill the House passed early Thursday morning to enact President Trump’s legislative agenda because the legislation …
thehill.com
Rand Paul a hard no on House GOP’s ‘big, beautiful bill’
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has told Senate GOP leadership that he is a hard no on the bill the House passed early Thursday morning to enact President Trump’s legislative agenda because the legislation …
I wouldn't have voted for it either knowing that.
Tyrus? You go guy....
www.facebook.com
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.
www.facebook.com
I might have to watch Gutfeld tonight if Tyrus is on.Tyrus? You go guy....
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.
Again but I must. This is America's President...
www.facebook.com
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.
www.facebook.com
She would never be in the same room with Tyrus. I saw the segment where he rips her to pieces but that was just responding to clips on Gutfeld. Clickbait headline.Tyrus? You go guy....
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.
I'm not a photography guy, didn't mean to imply that he was capturing 30 thousand FPS. I looked it up to satisfy my curiosity though and I think the point is still pertinent: while he got lucky that one of those 30 fps pictures caught the bullet, or at least the vapor trail of it, the light (image) captured in that instant was only from 1/8000th of a second. That's "luck" to catch the bullet, but if it was something else, he'd have it all in ridiculous, gruesome detail.
'One in a million'– pro photographer reveals how he took the President Trump 'flying bullet' photo with a Sony A1
A terrible moment, and an unbelievable image
Can you f'ing believe that dems are so brainwashed that basically 5 years ago they started
What a gash liar.
I think it's mostly dependent-free healthy adults below age 65 & eliminating illegals on it.
Don't both Houses have to pass it? Has THE House passed it? Just a majority in both? Thanks.
Make them PLO's ( permanent latrine orderly). If you've not seen "No Time for Sergeants" I recommend it.
First day of basic training. The DI asks if anyone has any college. One guy gets real excited. He is in the back row and kind of short, so he jumps up and down waving his arms, saying, "Me. I do." The DI says, "Good. You are my latrine queen."
30 or 60 fps is normal video.
An expensive slr can now go that fast in burst mode, of course. (He said he heard the pops and just kept shooting.... not likely he was shooting in 30fps burst mode for frkn speech coverage, and he wouldn't have "heard the pops" and THEN started capturing the burst shots before the bullet or bullets was/were already past the president.)
Most videographers will not shoot video at high shutter speeds because it makes the transition between frames less smooth.
The main reason someone would shoot video "wide open" is to capture both still images and video at the same time, and then do smoothing in post-production. It could be either laziness, only having one cameraman, or not having a tripod or it's a windy day and they're wanting to minimize camera shake when shooting. Could also be that they knew something was going down, because 1/8000 speed is extreme overkill (too soon?) when you're only capturing images of a speaker behind a podium.
Shooting at 1/8000s in those conditions would require your aperture to change, also decreasing your depth of field, so you would have the speaker in focus while those just behind them would be more blurry unless you were viewing from a great distance
Edit-
No matter what, almost impossibly lucky. If I hadn't read what the cameraman said, I WOULD'VE thought it was just dumb luck. Now I think he received a signal from someone before the shots were fired.
Last edited:
All is see is a Captain…….. < one of my go to’s 🤣
100%. The Big Beautiful Bill isn't so pretty as much as it is an ugly pig in lipstick.
I am tired of this shit. We need a law that forces stripped down bills that focus on one issue at a time. Then we get vital tax cuts without all this other bullshit attached.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
BB Recruiting Braydon Hawthorne is confident in Mark Pope's plan for him- Latest: TheySoSensitive
-
-
-
