ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
And they're lying. Surprise surprise. They've been dodging every direct question since 2019 at least. Every time you point out the failure of reason and results, they deflect or run in circles. THAT'S why they are all on ignore with most other people. They parrot media sound bytes and talking points, and then they run and hide when their lack of reasoning is made apparent. Last thing they do before they start all over again with more bullsht links and talking points is name calling and crying racism.

They're all just a really bad sitcom on a constant loop.

Well, I will say they are not stupid. I came back to the board after more than a decade layoff but it only took them 2 days to figure out that they cannot debate me. I come with facts. I use my real name because I stand by everything I say. They are cowards and they support policies that endanger my children and root for the country to fail. I will give no quarter.
 
Last edited:
Justice Roberts sided with the 3 liberals in the 5-4 decision

Just go ahead and assume he will be siding with liberals/globalists in most upcoming decisions regarding the Trump administration.

Relying on Barrett in most future decisions is a scary thought.



Roberts has ALWAYS been a POS. I mean, look who appointed him, an even bigger POS, GWB.

Look at my post from last night and it all makes sense. The connection is there in black and white.

Hes going to rule against trump if its close.
 
You need to learn how to do research

"The National Collegiate Athletics Association is made up of 1,100 colleges and universities in all 50 states that collectively enrol more than 530,000 student-athletes.
Mr Baker told a Senate committee in December that there were "less than 10" transgender athletes in the NCAA."

They literally had this guy in front of the senate.

The reason why Dems voted against it is because it's a nothing burger.

This is why I avoid this thread because y'all don't live in reality. Like what's the point in wasting energy when y'all don't argue in good faith?

Seriously, read those links. 10 out of 500k. That includes men to women and women to men. That's nothing.

ps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgezz0k3mno

https://www.kget.com/sports/ncaa-pr...an-10-transgender-athletes-in-college-sports/
Even if it’s 10, it’s 10 too many.
 
Well, I will say they are not stupid. I came back to the board after more than a decade layoff but it only took them 2 days to figure out that they cannot debate me. I come with facts and I come hard. I use my real name because I stand by everything I say. They are cowards and they support policies that endanger my children and root for the country to fail. I will give no quarter.

Yep. They know it and know exactly what they're doing.
 
Justice Roberts sided with the 3 liberals in the 5-4 decision

Just go ahead and assume he will be siding with liberals/globalists in most upcoming decisions regarding the Trump administration.

Relying on Barrett in most future decisions is a scary thought.


I’m dead serious here.

How freaking bad is the dirt the deep-state has on Roberts?
 
Newsweek and the ACLU? What total garbage. When I get a chance I will revisit and provide you more than 5 in high school. This is sick to even be discussing, the fact that you support this ignorance is simply hatred toward girls. As a girl dad, my respect for you is below zero. This stupidity happens every where.

They seem to think that just because the numbers aren’t crazy that it should be excused. One tranny winning a gold medal pushes 3 girls down a medal and denies at least one a medal altogether. So one tranny affects at least three girls in that scenario.
 
Someone help me with the most recent job numbers. Expected number was 140k, the actual number was 280k. Even my brain can comprehend that 140k MORE jobs were created last month than anticipated. So, how did the unemployment rate increase? Somehow, with obviously inflated job numbers from the previous administration, the unemployment rate almost always stayed the same or fell. Even after month after month of job numbers were revised downward, sometimes significantly downward. I don't want to make my head to give myself a headache trying to figure out this tortured math - help me someone!
 

ChatGPT said:​

This week, international stock markets experienced significant declines, primarily due to escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs led to a steep sell-off across global markets. Reuters+3WSJ+3Latest news & breaking headlines+3Reuters+7Reuters+7AP News+7
United States:
Europe:
Asia:
Emerging Markets:
  • Emerging markets were also affected, with the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) declining by approximately 5.5% over the week.
These market movements reflect investor concerns over a potential global recession and increased market volatility due to the escalating trade war.
...and guess who's gonna win this trade war?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue-ish

ChatGPT said:​

This week, international stock markets experienced significant declines, primarily due to escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs led to a steep sell-off across global markets. Reuters+3WSJ+3Latest news & breaking headlines+3Reuters+7Reuters+7AP News+7
United States:
Europe:
Asia:
Emerging Markets:
  • Emerging markets were also affected, with the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) declining by approximately 5.5% over the week.
These market movements reflect investor concerns over a potential global recession and increased market volatility due to the escalating trade war.
So the moves reflect "investor" concern. But reflect zero concern on Main Street. Who GAF at this point. Get back to me in 3-6 months. BTW, I'm still ahead of a year ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Craftydragon


Exactly what i said weeks ago. Till this is done, lawfare will continue to rule the day.
My question is why can’t the Trump administration file counter suits in jurisdictions with Republican friendly judges to overturn the injunctions of the liberal judges. Can that even be done? I’m no legal expert, but can’t they fight fire with fire?
 
I opposed the bank bail outs even though Bush was in office at the time.

Just crazy to me, the lefties would rather continue borrowing money at high interest rates to artificially inflate the stock market all so those who already have capital can horde it, simply because it’s Trump trying to rebuild the middle class of America.
30 yr under 6% today!
 
My question is why can’t the Trump administration file counter suits in jurisdictions with Republican friendly judges to overturn the injunctions of the liberal judges. Can that even be done? I’m no legal expert, but can’t they fight fire with fire?

Don't do that as it will adapt and acknowledge their "perceived" power.

They need to start defunding the positions. Seriously, that is the way to remove them .. One by one of needed, or class by class....
 
My question is why can’t the Trump administration file counter suits in jurisdictions with Republican friendly judges to overturn the injunctions of the liberal judges. Can that even be done? I’m no legal expert, but can’t they fight fire with fire?

That would be called a collateral attack and does no good. They can't preemptively file because there is no dispute ripe for adjudication since no one complained of injury.

There is one legit challenge and thats pushing it through the courts. That will be way more effective if they out these corrupt judges.
 
We ship to china

Oil and gas
Computers
Grain
Soy
Chemicals
Equipment for Transportation
And on and on
"In 2023, the total value of US trade in goods with China amounted to around $583B, composed of $143.55 billion in exports and $438.95 billion in imports, resulting in a US trade deficit of $295 billion."

You and President Xi must be so happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cleatortoises
Don't do that as it will adapt and acknowledge their "perceived" power.

They need to start defunding the positions. Seriously, that is the way to remove them .. One by one of needed, or class by class....
My thinking is do it to expose their hypocrisy. When Republican judges start overturning injunctions they’ll go whining about how it’s unconstitutional and whatnot.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT