ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Jerry-Clower-Shoot-Up-Amongst-Us-Gif.jpeg
 
Definitely concerned about how bad UKs defense is though. Kind of feels like last year's team but this team has a better coach. Hopefully it will improve as the year goes on. Then again these SEC teams are crazy good...maybe they just have tough offenses to stop.
 
I did some analysis on the FB season and started a thread in the football forum. No one seemed to care, so i'm posting a summary of the analysis here.
BTW, TO is defined as FUM, INT, Downs, and Missed FG. Other is end of half or end of game.
First the offense:
Yard Start (# of drives): Score %; TO %; Punt %; Other %
0-19 (36): 25%; 28%; 39%; 8%
20-30 (57): 35%; 18%; 42%; 5%
31-50 (28): 29%; 39%; 21%; 11%
51+ (6): 50%; 50%; 0%; 0%
Total (124): 31%; 27%; 35%; 7%.

Second the defense:
Yard Start (# of drives): Score %; TO %; Punt %; Other %
0-19 (29): 28%; 17%; 38%; 17%
20-30 (63): 21%; 27%; 43%; 10%
31-50 (29): 59%; 10%; 24%; 7%
51+ (10): 50%; 10%; 20%; 20%
Total (131): 33%; 20%; 36%; 11%

Takeaways:
1. When UK started past the 30 (34 drives), they were more likely to turn it over (14) than score (11). That is ridiculous IMO. (see #3)
2. D was pretty good on the 92 drives that started inside the 30: 21 scores vs 22 Turnovers! 38 punts too.
3. For the opponent 39 drives starting past the 30, a TOTALLY different story: 22 scores vs 4 turnovers. (FOUR TOs!?!) and only 9 punts.
4. UK started only 6 drives past the 50.
5. I think the Offense had 20 "3 and outs" and the Defense had 27. (Hard to tell on ESPNs play-by-play sometimes. They missed plays or had them out of order.)
 
Last edited:
I did some analysis on the FB season and started a thread in the football forum. No one seemed to care, so i'm posting a summary of the analysis here.
BTW, TO is defined as FUM, INT, Downs, and Missed FG. Other is end of half or end of game.
First the offense:
Yard Start (# of drives): Score %; TO %; Punt %; Other %
0-19 (36): 25%; 28%; 39%; 8%
20-30 (57): 35%; 18%; 42%; 5%
31-50 (28): 29%; 39%; 21%; 11%
51+ (6): 50%; 50%; 0%; 0%
Total (124): 31%; 27%; 35%; 7%.

Second the defense:
Yard Start (# of drives): Score %; TO %; Punt %; Other %
0-19 (29): 28%; 17%; 38%; 17%
20-30 (63): 21%; 27%; 43%; 10%
31-50 (29): 59%; 10%; 24%; 7%
51+ (10): 50%; 10%; 20%; 20%
Total (131): 33%; 20%; 36%; 11%

Takeaways:
1. When UK started past the 30 (34 drives), they were more likely to turn it over (14) than score (11). That is ridiculous IMO. (see #3)
2. D was pretty good on the 92 drives that started inside the 30: 21 scores vs 22 Turnovers! 38 punts too.
3. For the opponent 39 drives starting past the 30, a TOTALLY different story: 22 scores vs 4 turnovers. (FOUR TOs!?!) and only 9 punts.
4. UK started only 6 drives past the 50.
5. I think the Offense had 20 "3 and outs" and the Defense had 27. (Hard to tell on ESPNs play-by-play sometimes. They missed plays or had them out of order.)

Einstein looking mfer, or Poindexter... 😆


Sorry but, I typed it.... "Ain't" drunk either....✌️
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Lost In FL
I did some analysis on the FB season and started a thread in the football forum. No one seemed to care, so i'm posting a summary of the analysis here.
BTW, TO is defined as FUM, INT, Downs, and Missed FG. Other is end of half or end of game.
First the offense:
Yard Start (# of drives): Score %; TO %; Punt %; Other %
0-19 (36): 25%; 28%; 39%; 8%
20-30 (57): 35%; 18%; 42%; 5%
31-50 (28): 29%; 39%; 21%; 11%
51+ (6): 50%; 50%; 0%; 0%
Total (124): 31%; 27%; 35%; 7%.

Second the defense:
Yard Start (# of drives): Score %; TO %; Punt %; Other %
0-19 (29): 28%; 17%; 38%; 17%
20-30 (63): 21%; 27%; 43%; 10%
31-50 (29): 59%; 10%; 24%; 7%
51+ (10): 50%; 10%; 20%; 20%
Total (131): 33%; 20%; 36%; 11%

Takeaways:
1. When UK started past the 30 (34 drives), they were more likely to turn it over (14) than score (11). That is ridiculous IMO. (see #3)
2. D was pretty good on the 92 drives that started inside the 30: 21 scores vs 22 Turnovers! 38 punts too.
3. For the opponent 39 drives starting past the 30, a TOTALLY different story: 22 scores vs 4 turnovers. (FOUR TOs!?!) and only 9 punts.
4. UK started only 6 drives past the 50.
5. I think the Offense had 20 "3 and outs" and the Defense had 27. (Hard to tell on ESPNs play-by-play sometimes. They missed plays or had them out of order.)

Went over and took a look at your posts on the football board. Good stuff. Probably didn't get response cause people want to banish that season from their memory and everyone has moved on to basketball season. You must have some insomnia like I do haha. You have a lot of good info that after a few games next year you will be able to compare and let us know if we are improving at all.
 
Last edited:
Went over and took a look at your posts on the football board. Good stuff. Probably didn't get response cause people won't to banish that season from their memory and everyone has moved on to basketball season. You must have some insomnia like I do haha. You have a lot of good info that after a few games next year you will be able to compare and let us know if we are improving at all.

You're drunk for sure.... 😉 😄
 
Oh no, here comes shitsplins with 15 anecdotal links... and will be braying for days...

Im glad you brought up the links. Not saying hes a paid troll but.... adding links (no matter how pathetic) is absolutely what they are told to do. Mainly because it impacted social media algorithms and the platforms see their comments as most trustworthy.

Its going to be similar in the new community notes or so I was told. So it will be better than before but theyre just going to refocus and flood the algorithm.
 
Anybody see this highlight of his dunk where he got the ball and walked, double dribbled and carried all at the same time before “posterizing” somebody? Wasn’t called of course.

Why didn't he get a T for taunting (worse than the TX player against O$U) and another for hanging on the rim??!?!

Oh yeah, bc he is sponsored, in part, by the ESPN hype machine.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT