ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
You all remember when John Brennan spied on Feinstein?

Feinstein says CIA spied on Senate computers

We're a country run by these unaccountable intel agencies. These are evil and dangerous people. Nothing happens to them. They just have a giant blackmail operation on everyone.

Think about all of the Epstein files they have to threaten people with in addition to their own ability to spy on them.

Remember when they tried to say Assange raped someone? This is all these psychos do. Remember when they broke into Daniel Ellsberg's psychoanalyst's office to steal his documents all cause he released the Pentagon Papers?

You should believe ZERO 'Oh I just remembered I was raped' allegations against someone that hurts the deep state's agenda.
Here’s a good link.
 
  • Like
Reactions: berniecarbo
Just a reminder:

Holder famously referred to himself as "the president’s wingman," and some lawmakers worried that Garland might take a similar view.

Garland insisted, however, that he is "not the president’s lawyer."
When asked if he could commit to not going after political enemies of the Biden administration, Garland said he would "absolutely" not direct the department in that way, calling it "totally inappropriate."
 
I caught snappy reparte in 1985 from a girl in a frat house closet.
Tetracycline, peppermint schnapps and ramen noodles can can cure anything in your 20s.
Are you sure that was a girl? Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Rainbow Gay GIF by LGBTQ Youth
 
Well this is a great endorsement for her as AG. If MSNBC hates her...she's gotta be a great pick


This is exactly the type of person i hoped for. Everyone here bashed me because i pointed out the obvious which was gaetz was a poor pick. He was a trump 1.0 pick and the rinos actually saved him from himself. I hope he owed gaetz some favor because otherwise that was just weird.

This pick is much better. It was a bit of a long road, but glad he finally reached the right destination.
 
Bondi is very good and may have been Trumps initial pick anyway. Art of the Deal move?

It revealed some of who our enemies are within the ranks, so it was worth doing.

Did it? They're on board with all other trump picks. If they were anti trump, theyd oppose them all.

Gaetz was just an awful pick. When i saw the news, i really thought it was satire or something.

That doesn't excuse this group's general untrustworthy behavior but here on this issue it was the terrible pick not trump.
 
  • Love
Reactions: vhcat70
Geez you are spiking footballs after having your political ass handed to you. Because of obnoxiousness like this the reps run the executive, the legislative and the judiciary is full of conservative justices we’ll come Jan 20th Matt Gaetz any of this other stuff is a distraction and denial from the beating Dems took.
Its like beating someone 90-7 and they brag about blocking an extra point kick.
 
Did it? They're on board with all other trump picks. If they were anti trump, theyd oppose them all.

Gaetz was just an awful pick. When i saw the news, i really thought it was satire or something.

That doesn't excuse this group's general untrustworthy behavior but here on this issue it was the terrible pick not trump.

Fully understand your thoughts on it. But I presume most of the opposition to Gaetz was because he went against the uniparty in ousting McCarthy.

So in my opinion, it’s not a good sign they’ve got this momentum, and even worse when you hear Mike Rogers’ name being floated for FBI.

Trump has made some good picks. Some not so good. But it seems like the longer things go, the more influence the uniparty had over his decisions and that’s what killed his first term. AG and FBI director were two critical pieces that allowed (and promoted) the Russia collusion hoax.

Bondi seems like a good pick given the X reaction from people I generally end up agreeing with. However, the uniparty victory over Gaetz is not a good sign for the MAGA agenda given the uniparty history of torpedoing Trump.
 
This is exactly the type of person i hoped for. Everyone here bashed me because i pointed out the obvious which was gaetz was a poor pick. He was a trump 1.0 pick and the rinos actually saved him from himself. I hope he owed gaetz some favor because otherwise that was just weird.

This pick is much better. It was a bit of a long road, but glad he finally reached the right destination.
I agree totally with this. Unlike Gaetz she actually practiced law for many years. She was a prosecutor and state AG. Way more qualified that Gaetz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigblueinsanity
Fully understand your thoughts on it. But I presume most of the opposition to Gaetz was because he went against the uniparty in ousting McCarthy.

So in my opinion, it’s not a good sign they’ve got this momentum, and even worse when you hear Mike Rogers’ name being floated for FBI.

Trump has made some good picks. Some not so good. But it seems like the longer things go, the more influence the uniparty had over his decisions and that’s what killed his first term. AG and FBI director were two critical pieces that allowed (and promoted) the Russia collusion hoax.

Bondi seems like a good pick given the X reaction from people I generally end up agreeing with. However, the uniparty victory over Gaetz is not a good sign for the MAGA agenda given the uniparty history of torpedoing Trump.

Agree with you. Thought Bondi was very good during the impeachment and she’s loyal to DT. However, seeing Jeb Bush and Lindsey Graham loving this pick is a bit concerning. If Rogers is picked then I think we can expect business as usual come the next 4 years. Maybe they can be successful with decreasing the level of the swamp a bit but highly doubt it’s the drain a lot of us were hoping for.
 
Fully understand your thoughts on it. But I presume most of the opposition to Gaetz was because he went against the uniparty in ousting McCarthy.

So in my opinion, it’s not a good sign they’ve got this momentum, and even worse when you hear Mike Rogers’ name being floated for FBI.

Trump has made some good picks. Some not so good. But it seems like the longer things go, the more influence the uniparty had over his decisions and that’s what killed his first term. AG and FBI director were two critical pieces that allowed (and promoted) the Russia collusion hoax.

Bondi seems like a good pick given the X reaction from people I generally end up agreeing with. However, the uniparty victory over Gaetz is not a good sign for the MAGA agenda given the uniparty history of torpedoing Trump.

I wonder if the uni party influence is because trump didn't have a candidate in mind? Those positions are crucial and badly in need of reform from outside dc.
 
This is exactly the type of person i hoped for. Everyone here bashed me because i pointed out the obvious which was gaetz was a poor pick.

He wasn't a poor pick....just very poor timing. There is a difference. You and a few others on here are starting to play the conspiracy theorist game a tad too early as Trump hasn't even been sworn in. Give it time to see how things play out.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: vhcat70
Fully understand your thoughts on it. But I presume most of the opposition to Gaetz was because he went against the uniparty in ousting McCarthy.

So in my opinion, it’s not a good sign they’ve got this momentum, and even worse when you hear Mike Rogers’ name being floated for FBI.

Trump has made some good picks. Some not so good. But it seems like the longer things go, the more influence the uniparty had over his decisions and that’s what killed his first term. AG and FBI director were two critical pieces that allowed (and promoted) the Russia collusion hoax.

Bondi seems like a good pick given the X reaction from people I generally end up agreeing with. However, the uniparty victory over Gaetz is not a good sign for the MAGA agenda given the uniparty history of torpedoing Trump.
Does anyone know that Trump is actually interested in Rogers? Just seems odd as most of his picks have been centered around going against the corrupt swamp monster that is the DC establishment, and Rogers would be the exact opposite in one of the most important positions Trump is going to appoint. I find it hard to think that Trump, after being completely rail-roaded by the deep state/corrupt DOJ, is going to put the exact type of person who is all for using the DOJ as a weapon to go against Trump in charge.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT