Got news for ya. The Democrat Party doesn’t learn things. They are run by Satan. Once you accept the reality that lefty behavior is in fact rational and supernatural, it all makes sense.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
The entire democrat platform is just lying about what Trump said, or assigning some secret meaning.
“Very fine people,” “suckers and losers,” etc. all just lies to craft a narrative.
Top Oregon official put on leave for allegedly prioritizing 'qualified' job candidates over 'gender identity'
A high-ranking employee of the Oregon Department of Forestry reportedly wanted to hire new members based on merit rather than their personal identity.
Send them all back to their home countries. Vivek has the correct plan to do it. Do not need mass deportation teams to gather them up. Just cut off their taxpayer paid welfare and most will leave on their own.Meanwhile, back in the real world....
Read an article the other day where Portland (who would have thunk it) is gearing up for riots when he wins.
Vivek is correct but the downside to it is that it would also lead to (IMO) a huge uptick in crime. A lot of these illegals look at the American people as rich and ripe for the taking.
I agree with him completely. While she is easy on the eyes, I do not understand people that want to film themselves doing things like this. "social" media has made so many narcissists. Or ppl were always like that and this just lets them do it for the world to see. IDK.
If any of this is true, the F^^^er should be arrested IMO. Left's rules: severity of the crime...
The McDonald's photo op is no coincidence. They are once again emulating trump and trying to connect to the "little people". Theyre so out of touch by living in their ivory towers they cant even fake it well enough to make it believable.
The left is probably leaking stuff to get him out. I hope he gets to the finish line.
Lol this is great and further shows how out of touch they are.
"Trump wants to secure the border, put criminals in jail, cut government, get rid of the swamp, end the neverending wars, return sanity to the gender nonsense!"
Voters - "oh? Tell me more because this sounds pretty good. Why was I repeatedly told he is worse than hitler?"
He said "fair share" is a myth, you moron.
Consumption based taxes, what an idea ... who consumes more? The rich person or the poor person, REGARDLESS of income.
You are truly terrible.
Has anyone studied up on the pros/cons of amendment 2 for KY schools? All I can get from the basics is that the general assembly will have the "option" of allocating funds to private schools, but nothing will be required. Parents are still on the hook for tuition and/or scholarships from the school itself. I get where the lower economic areas/counties may be hurt as they don't have the luxury of property tax benefits like FCPS does, for example, and they need all the funding from the state they can get. However, I have yet to see anything regarding rock solid facts against this amendment. Thoughts?
If interest is deductible, they're no paying it. Duh.
Anyone with any sense knows a 1% loan for money is a great deal as you can invest at a greater return. So yes, the rich would/do pay 1% for a loan over cash. You have an investment problem.
Imo it will be a good thing. It isnt vouchers per se because the parents dont pay, but the funding is from the state based on attendance, so its the same functionality.
I saw alot of people claiming it will kill rural schools. Wrong because there is no competition there. So they will remain uneffected.
It will absolutely kill crappy schools in cities if they dont improve, which is a good thing. By introducing competition to the system, parents get more say in their kids' education and schools either come in line or die off.
The only people who will really suffer are the teachers union and the do nothing politicians/administrators if they dont get their public schools in line.
Round them up and send them to Dim controlled cities and cut off their federally funded cash and let the dim cities fund them. That will destroy those bastions of evil and corruption killing two birds with one stone.
Why would low income areas be hurt? They'd still get state funding for public schools.
I only see pluses. Parents deciding where to send their kids to schools vs. having one public choice is a great idea. Competition improves quality. And it must be good since school supers are lined up against it. What I can't imagine is that Trump will get 60%+ of the KY vote again, Pubs have super majorities in the Legislature, and people are going to turn around and vote against them? Crazy sh!t. Are Legislature members & US Senators & House members out campaigning for it? I've seen one ad by Rand paul for it, that's it. Anyone?
You make it sound as if theyre getting a credit, which is a 1:1 reduction in tax owed. Thats not the case. The deduction is just a reduction of taxable income, which impacts the number to which they apply your tax rate. I know im not using specific terms of art but im fairly certain thats how its intended to work.
Furthermore, from a wealth perspective, with paying cash you still avoid the gap when your asset continues to rapidly decrease in value while your interest stays in the same..
Now if you are just hunting tax deductions because you make too much money, then still paying cash on a vehicle over a certain weight gives you that advantage.
So there are still advantages to paying cash.
Ok I take back anything nice I’ve said about you. You really think that money going 100% to a bank vs having additional investment income is bad? Money being invested is what runs our economy. You really are a low life socialist lefty.
The words used that I've heard have been a tax deduction, not an income deduction as you suggest. Regardless, how does that help low income tax people anyway?
I've normally paid cash for non-leased cars. But 1% loan is a better deal than cash.
You think paying 1% for a loan to whomever to keep the cash to invest isn't a better deal for the investor? I really can't believe people think paying cash over 1% is the better idea. Any investor would jump all over all the 1% money they could get.
I scratch my head at people thinking others come here for positive personal comments back at them. I'm here for an exchange of ideas, that's all.
Similar threads
