Walmart still on board. š¤£I guess they still exist. Same goes for Antifa. Yeah they'll probably show their ugly heads if Trump wins.
Walmart still on board. š¤£I guess they still exist. Same goes for Antifa. Yeah they'll probably show their ugly heads if Trump wins.
Send them all back to their home countries. Vivek has the correct plan to do it. Do not need mass deportation teams to gather them up. Just cut off their taxpayer paid welfare and most will leave on their own.Meanwhile, back in the real world....
Read an article the other day where Portland (who would have thunk it) is gearing up for riots when he wins.I guess they still exist. Same goes for Antifa. Yeah they'll probably show their ugly heads if Trump wins.
Vivek is correct but the downside to it is that it would also lead to (IMO) a huge uptick in crime. A lot of these illegals look at the American people as rich and ripe for the taking.Send them all back to their home countries. Vivek has the correct plan to do it. Do not need mass deportation teams to gather them up. Just cut off their taxpayer paid welfare and most will leave on their own.
I agree with him completely. While she is easy on the eyes, I do not understand people that want to film themselves doing things like this. "social" media has made so many narcissists. Or ppl were always like that and this just lets them do it for the world to see. IDK.
If any of this is true, the F^^^er should be arrested IMO. Left's rules: severity of the crime...
The left is probably leaking stuff to get him out. I hope he gets to the finish line.If any of this is true, the F^^^er should be arrested IMO. Left's rules: severity of the crime...
He said "fair share" is a myth, you moron.I have no idea what fair share means, so I can hardly push for it. Please explain fair share.
Trump's high tariffs are consumption based. Should really help those paying no income tax, LOL.
If interest is deductible, they're no paying it. Duh.It's making the interest tax deductible, not eliminating it. Jfc. Reading comprehension sorely lacking here.
And why in the world do you think a rich person is even going to pay 1% interest if they can just pay cash? š¤
Make it make sense, old top.
Has anyone studied up on the pros/cons of amendment 2 for KY schools? All I can get from the basics is that the general assembly will have the "option" of allocating funds to private schools, but nothing will be required. Parents are still on the hook for tuition and/or scholarships from the school itself. I get where the lower economic areas/counties may be hurt as they don't have the luxury of property tax benefits like FCPS does, for example, and they need all the funding from the state they can get. However, I have yet to see anything regarding rock solid facts against this amendment. Thoughts?
Round them up and send them to Dim controlled cities and cut off their federally funded cash and let the dim cities fund them. That will destroy those bastions of evil and corruption killing two birds with one stone.Vivek is correct but the downside to it is that it would also lead to (IMO) a huge uptick in crime. A lot of these illegals look at the American people as rich and ripe for the taking.
Why would low income areas be hurt? They'd still get state funding for public schools.Has anyone studied up on the pros/cons of amendment 2 for KY schools? All I can get from the basics is that the general assembly will have the "option" of allocating funds to private schools, but nothing will be required. Parents are still on the hook for tuition and/or scholarships from the school itself. I get where the lower economic areas/counties may be hurt as they don't have the luxury of property tax benefits like FCPS does, for example, and they need all the funding from the state they can get. However, I have yet to see anything regarding rock solid facts against this amendment. Thoughts?
So if there is no cost of interest on a loan, why pay cash? I have a 1% car loan going to 2020. Why pay cash? Why would the wealthy pay cash?
Well we are.Vivek is correct but the downside to it is that it would also lead to (IMO) a huge uptick in crime. A lot of these illegals look at the American people as rich and ripe for the taking.
If interest is deductible, they're no paying it. Duh.
Anyone with any sense knows a 1% loan for money is a great deal as you can invest at a greater return. So yes, the rich would/do pay 1% for a loan over cash. You have an investment problem.
The words used that I've heard have been a tax deduction, not an income deduction as you suggest. Regardless, how does that help low income tax people anyway?You make it sound as if theyre getting a credit, which is a 1:1 reduction in tax owed. Thats not the case. The deduction is just a reduction of taxable income, which impacts the number to which they apply your tax rate. I know im not using specific terms of art but im fairly certain thats how its intended to work.
The poorer can't afford a car. Give them money over giving a deduction to those with a loan. If there's no interest cost on a loan, why pay cash?
Taxes were lowered as part of the removal of the salt taxes deductions.
I guarantee you 95% of people would be tickled with $250K AGI.
I told you what his SS policy is: Do nothing & let it run dry.
So waiters making $20/hr with tips shouldn't pay as much tax as $20/hr burger flippers ( That's not an insult to B-fers.)?
I have no idea what fair share means, so I can hardly push for it. Please explain fair share.
Trump's high tariffs are consumption based. Should really help those paying no income tax, LOL.
You think paying 1% for a loan to whomever to keep the cash to invest isn't a better deal for the investor? I really can't believe people think paying cash over 1% is the better idea. Any investor would jump all over all the 1% money they could get.Ok I take back anything nice Iāve said about you. You really think that money going 100% to a bank vs having additional investment income is bad? Money being invested is what runs our economy. You really are a low life socialist lefty.
I'll try to remember to keep responding to your posts.Yea youāre a clown. Off to ignore with the rest of the socialist trolls.
More of the latter.Are they all wearing masks to hide their shame at being coerced into doing this shit? š¤
Or is it just a further sign of the mental damage done to them by people like sambowieshin? š¤Ø
Banks fail and in comes the Central Bank Digital Currency to the rescue.
Ronald Trump needs a portable lie detector machine.So youāre going to get help?
The SS ain't killing Ronald Trump. That's ridiculous.Eventually the Secret Service will just kill him themselves and get it over with.
BLM still tries to claim some relevancy, but they have largely been called out for their BS, so they are far less prevalent now. Antifa though, those little punks are just waiting in the wings till November to mobilize in key cities and cause havoc and mayhem.I guess they still exist. Same goes for Antifa. Yeah they'll probably show their ugly heads if Trump wins.
Would venture to guess a lot of rich people may even lease their vehiclesIt's making the interest tax deductible, not eliminating it. Jfc. Reading comprehension sorely lacking here.
And why in the world do you think a rich person is even going to pay 1% interest if they can just pay cash? š¤
Make it make sense, old top.
They don't realize the people it actually helps the most are those who have poor credit and go to one of those used car lots that will give somebody like them a car with a high interest loan that stretches out over 6 years or so. They are the ones that benefit the most from a policy like that. My son who graduated from college last year and has himself a reasonably decent job, needed a new car to replace the 1997 Toyota Camry beater he was driving earlier this year. He budgeted how much he could afford monthly and got him self a 2020 Hyundai Ionic. he had some credit rating, but not great, ended up with an interest rate a little over 8% which was actually fairly reasonable, considering, but he is the kind of person who will benefit the most from that, Not me who is close to having my car paid off and only with about a 3% interest rate.Kind of like my health insurance. Sure, I get to write it off for my taxes, but I'm still paying it every month. š
They lost everything in 2016 and instead of self reflecting, they doubled down on their insanity.
So do I vote yes on this or is it going to be one of those oddly worded issues on the ballot meant to trick you into voting the opposite of what you really should.Imo it will be a good thing. It isnt vouchers per se because the parents dont pay, but the funding is from the state based on attendance, so its the same functionality.
I saw alot of people claiming it will kill rural schools. Wrong because there is no competition there. So they will remain uneffected.
It will absolutely kill crappy schools in cities if they dont improve, which is a good thing. By introducing competition to the system, parents get more say in their kids' education and schools either come in line or die off.
The only people who will really suffer are the teachers union and the do nothing politicians/administrators if they dont get their public schools in line.
Send them all back to their home countries. Vivek has the correct plan to do it. Do not need mass deportation teams to gather them up. Just cut off their taxpayer paid welfare and most will leave on their own.
Let those liberal cities burn to the ground.Read an article the other day where Portland (who would have thunk it) is gearing up for riots when he wins.
The words used that I've heard have been a tax deduction, not an income deduction as you suggest. Regardless, how does that help low income tax people anyway?
I've normally paid cash for non-leased cars. But 1% loan is a better deal than cash.
What a horrible thing to say . Is that real and not AI ?
Private schools - if given public money - will only raise tuition even further. It has been proven over and over and over again. I hate to be a dick, but the reason private education works is because for the most part they keep the bad students out.only see pluses. Parents deciding where to send their kids to schools vs. having one public choice is a great idea. Competition improves quality.
Yep - even if she "wins" we aren't going to recognize this.