ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Good old National Proletariat Radio.

GZS963ZbgAAY2qU

I still can't believe that the left actually thought he would casually forgetfully slip an N word slur during an interview with a major journalist.

It amazes me really what they think about run-of-the-mill conservatives who love this country.
 
Wondering at what point key cogs in the fraud wheel decide the risk is not worth the reward. You have to be pretty goddam confident Kamabla is going to win and you aren’t going to get caught if you are going to participate in the democrat fraud at this point. After the Biden admin lawfare and years of pretending the fraud didn’t exist, you’d have to assume Trump’s DOJ will be throwing the book at everyone if he overcomes the margin of fraud.
Exactly. The danger of doing it exactly as they did before is greater.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
lol


Musk is a weird, autistic genius. Says cringy shit all the time. I don’t even need to watch the video.

I’ll take a weird autistic genius over a closeted flamboyant compulsive liar any day of the week.
I think there's a whole lotta Tism out there we don't even recognize as Tism.
Trump's inability to recognize inappropriate comments and behavior is most likely somewhere on the spectrum too. Probably why he and Elon jive so well together. My Autistic kids at school always bonded.
I'm truly not saying this as a disparaging viewpoint on Autism either. I have a family member who has Autism.
I think Musk and Trump are highly intelligent but VERY limited in scope. That is also a hallmark of Autism.
Just because you can fly rockets and create business models doesn't mean you will be a good politician or leader.
Kinda like doctors that fly planes.
 
No, he's arguing it's affiliated with legal personhood. Same as birth certificate. That's when you're considered an individual by our legal system, unless otherwise specified.
Absolutely fascinating how an individual who rails so much against fascists and nazis seemingly embraces government bureaucracies being the arbiters of what or who is human. Ironic isn't? Must be a socialist thing. BTW, that is not what he is arguing and if you would have bothered reading his whole stupid diatribe, he was saying that fetus in the womb is not a human distinct from the mother. He then in Wile E Coyote fashion thought the IRS determination of being a dependent or having a social security number proved his thesis, while ignoring the scientific fact that a fetus has unique DNA separate and identifiable from the mothers. So no, his dumb twisted argument is not an argument on bureaucratic recognition for legal purposes but is in fact an argument if the unborn are even "humans" distinct from the mother. But this is par for the course with you two cartoons. You are so insufferably driven by your need to be right with your wildly inconsistent ideology, that you pervert, twist, and move goalposts to the point that you soon forget what your original argument was. I'm starting to wonder if you two are distinct individuals are separate from one another or do you carry the same social security number?
 
There are so many reasons to have hope for the future if Trump wins. I wish so many people on the left weren't so ignorant and/or downright stupid.


It's remarkable; isn't it? If he wins, they'll get the president they don't deserve. Things will be better, or atleast not as bad as they could;ve been, and they'll be none the wiser as he actually advances various causes thye, ostensibly at least, cared about.
 
You're a clown. This is a national debate. Your nutjob party is the one passing these sick laws.
There are ads on television stations all across America addressing this very issue.
Sounds like you are one of those MAGAs that loves to talk big about abortion and pass laws with no exceptions but don't like hearing the disgusting stories of the effects of those laws on little children.
Or as you like to call pregnant 10 year old rape victims...."Mom".
Get over it or vote for a change in those laws. 🤢



So this child was allowed to have an abortion? If you’re trying to drum up support against illegals raping young girls, you have my full backing. Otherwise i’m not sure what your point is.
 
I still can't believe that the left actually thought he would casually forgetfully slip an N word slur during an interview with a major journalist.

It amazes me really what they think about run-of-the-mill conservatives who love this country.
He did.
 
Republicans in red states are pleading for the mindless MAGAts to stop with the insane conspiracy theories. The cult is like a brainless hive that just attacks whatever moves.... Even if what moves is trying to help them.
Idiots
Oh shut up. Mr. dEmOcRaCy!11!!
 
Dion. You don’t really care either way. I guarantee you Joe Biden has uttered the N word many many more times in his life than Trump. Yet you voted for Sleepy, and would have again, if he could have kept his vegetative state under wraps in the White House cellar a little longer.
 
Absolutely fascinating how an individual who rails so much against fascists and nazis seemingly embraces government bureaucracies being the arbiters of what or who is human. Ironic isn't? Must be a socialist thing. BTW, that is not what he is arguing and if you would have bothered reading his whole stupid diatribe, he was saying that fetus in the womb is not a human distinct from the mother. He then in Wile E Coyote fashion thought the IRS determination of being a dependent or having a social security number proved his thesis, while ignoring the scientific fact that a fetus has unique DNA separate and identifiable from the mothers. So no, his dumb twisted argument is not an argument on bureaucratic recognition for legal purposes but is in fact an argument if the unborn are even "humans" distinct from the mother. But this is par for the course with you two cartoons. You are so insufferably driven by your need to be right with your wildly inconsistent ideology, that you pervert, twist, and move goalposts to the point that you soon forget what your original argument was. I'm starting to wonder if you two are distinct individuals are separate from one another or do you carry the same social security number?
I mean you can ask him but that is indeed what he was arguing. The mother is inarguably a person with legal rights. The only way those wouldn’t trump the fetus’s is if it was a full legal person as well with equal rights to the mother’s. That legal status isn’t conferred until birth. If you want to move that line back through legislation you’re free to try, but that will bring with it many other legal entanglements, for instance the tax dependency issue he used as just one example. Government isn’t the arbiter of who is a “human”, but they are the arbiter of who has what legal status. A Palestinian in the occupied West Bank is unquestionably a “human”, but has no government and no legal status and no rights.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT