If it weren’t for whacked out Karens for whom abortion reigns supreme, she would struggle to get 40% of the vote.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
It's remarkable; isn't it? If he wins, they'll get the president they don't deserve. Things will be better, or atleast not as bad as they could;ve been, and they'll be none the wiser as he actually advances various causes thye, ostensibly at least, cared about.
Wall Street Journal, 2:42 pm EST today:
Thanks, Joe! Thanks, Kamala!
Federal Deficit Hit $1.8 Trillion for 2024, CBO Says
U.S. budget shortfalls fueled by interest costs, Social Security, Medicare
Thanks, Joe! Thanks, Kamala!
Last edited:
I’m still trying to figure out why we needed a moral justification for the cold war.
Your presidential candidate is.
So this child was allowed to have an abortion? If you’re trying to drum up support against illegals raping young girls, you have my full backing. Otherwise i’m not sure what your point is.You're a clown. This is a national debate. Your nutjob party is the one passing these sick laws.
There are ads on television stations all across America addressing this very issue.
Sounds like you are one of those MAGAs that loves to talk big about abortion and pass laws with no exceptions but don't like hearing the disgusting stories of the effects of those laws on little children.
Or as you like to call pregnant 10 year old rape victims...."Mom".
Get over it or vote for a change in those laws. 🤢
Ohio man sentenced to life in prison for rape of 10-year-old girl who traveled to Indiana for abortion
The case drew national attention when the obstetrician-gynecologist who provided the procedure spoke about it with a reporter.www.cbsnews.com
Dion. You don’t really care either way. I guarantee you Joe Biden has uttered the N word many many more times in his life than Trump. Yet you voted for Sleepy, and would have again, if he could have kept his vegetative state under wraps in the White House cellar a little longer.
I mean you can ask him but that is indeed what he was arguing. The mother is inarguably a person with legal rights. The only way those wouldn’t trump the fetus’s is if it was a full legal person as well with equal rights to the mother’s. That legal status isn’t conferred until birth. If you want to move that line back through legislation you’re free to try, but that will bring with it many other legal entanglements, for instance the tax dependency issue he used as just one example. Government isn’t the arbiter of who is a “human”, but they are the arbiter of who has what legal status. A Palestinian in the occupied West Bank is unquestionably a “human”, but has no government and no legal status and no rights.
You'll apply it to current events like Ukraine in a heartbeat, but never to the historical context of past events you've mythologized in your head.
Libs more riled up today than i can ever remember. Mustve been given some bad news through the troll network.
And Trump has used it many more times than Biden. Plenty of former coworkers have said as much. A word isn't going to hurt anyone. It's what those who are willing to use the word represent.
Yet if someone murders that Palestinian if they happen to visit the US, the murderer would still go to prison. Murder of another human being is illegal regardless of what rights the individual has been deemed to posses by the US government. The argument is whether a fetus is a human being or not. Having its own separate DNA certainly points to the fact that it is its own individual and not just part of the mother. You can go to prison for destroying an eagle egg because anyone with common sense knows it will become an eagle. I'm pretty sure eagles don't have a social security number and I don't recall having the option to claim one as a dependent on my income taxes.
Yes it’s a problem. Its callled the Logan Act. Doesn’t matter what fantasy world Trump lives in, he’s not President. Putin is at war with one of our allies. Trump can’t be engaging in diplomacy with him. Jesus Christ.
That child shouldn't have to travel hundreds of miles and be made to feel she is breaking the law in her state for wanting to get a rapist's baby out of her body.
No they wouldn’t. Netanyahu and other Israeli officials are welcomed here with open arms. Speaking to Congress and presidential candidates. They aren’t arrested for murder when they step on our soil. Are you dumb?
US soldiers aren't arrested for murder for acts committed during war. There are exceptions idiot. Are you dumb? No need to answer. The question was rhetorical.
You want to see evil? This is evil. This your dEmOcRaCy!11!! But you don't want to talk about this, do you, asshole?
Yes, many illegals have been issued SSN’s, along with pseudo identities. It part of the ruse to use them as voters.Because the IRS does not determine if someone is human. They merely issue a social security number at birth, then you can claim them as a dependent. But you absolutely can deduct the medical expenses of pregnancy.
Illegals do not have social security numbers......Are they human?
Not sure why I have to explain this to another supposed adult, but here we are.
Israelis have been killing Palestinians for decades. They occupy their lands. Are you arguing they've been at war for almost a hundred years? Kinda changes the perspective on 10/7 then, doesn't it? No, they slaughter with impunity because they're outside the legal mechanisms that would hold them accountable. Not because it's allowed by war.
They’re just rubbing our noses in it at this point.
Every interview she does is said to be “ending her campaign” or “the nail in the coffin” for her. Yet here we are with a race still too close to call when it should be an epic landslide for Trump.
Dude, you are totally changing the subject to something completely unrelated in order to avoid my point. Is this you Kamala?
Maybe I need to dumb it down for you. If an illegal alien from Mexico crosses the boarder and I shoot and kill him for no reason related to self defense, is that or is it not illegal? He has no social security number, isn't a dependent of any American citizen. By your logic he has no rights. But I would still be arrested for killing him without a justifiable cause. Right?
I read some article today by some liberal professor talking about Joa and Kamala rising to the challenge of the hurricane and Trump trying to score points off a tragedy. I bet his comfortable ass was nowhere near western North Carolina.
Last edited:
No, he has the rights given to him by our Constitution when he enters the US. It specifies that all persons in the US have those rights. Not fetuses. Just not the rights reserved for citizens. Fly to Palestine, kill a Palestinian, then see what happens to you when you come home. Hint: nothing, unless Israel desires different.
I'm apparently not the one who needs it dumbed down.
I'm not talking about Palestine. I couldn't give two shits what happens there. I'm talking about the US where I'm a citizen. And yes, as soon as you are on US soil you have the right not to be murdered. A fetus in the US is on US soil, therefore has the same right not to be murdered, whether it has a social security number or not is meaningless, which is the point you were trying to argue.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Kentucky at Lipscomb (Opening Day DoubleHeader)- Latest: Comebakatz3
-
-
-
Kentucky opens as a 1.5 point dog at Texas- Latest: ImTheVillageIdiot