It's almost as if Kamala is campaigning for Trump.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Not one thing. Not even a joke about different flavored ice cream to deflect.
Should have stuck with “well I grew up in a middle class home” because answering questions is a disaster.
They’re going to overwhelm the power grid firing up all the printers they need for kamabla ballots at this point.
LOL
They fake-promoted her so they could hide her.
President Biden promotes press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre to new top role
https://www.foxnews.com/media/presi...ess-secretary-karine-jean-pierre-new-top-role
They fake-promoted her so they could hide her.
President Biden promotes press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre to new top role
https://www.foxnews.com/media/presi...ess-secretary-karine-jean-pierre-new-top-role
Cook County is always the worst and most corrupt run city in America yet, we let one of these POS become president for essentially 12 years. Maybe even 16 considering he stayed in D.C. to sabotage shit.
Last edited:
You know that whole terrible dark Brandon meme the lefties tried to make popular but couldn’t because it’s so stupid?
I think it’s time for the right to revive that meme now that he seems to be having some lucid moments and is torpedoing kamabla each chance he gets.
I think it’s time for the right to revive that meme now that he seems to be having some lucid moments and is torpedoing kamabla each chance he gets.
Last edited:
...and the, in the very next breath, Democrats argue we need immigrants to work.
Interesting article I read. Particularly interesting was an excerpt from 45 Communist goals read into the Congressional record in 1963. The ones quoted are exactly what we see going on in our country today: break down standards of morality, promote homosexuality, perversion and promiscuity as 'healthy and normal', attack the family as an institution, corrupt and brainwash the young as they are gullible, etc. Very enlightening article. I know some will dismiss it as 'just another American Thinker article'. However, the quoted portions of the article are not the author's opinions and are sourced from outside the author's experience.
www.americanthinker.com
Why Democrat Leaders Corrupt Their Own Youth In The Name Of Liberty
Modern Democrats deliberately corrupt young people. The very idea of this probably seems absurd and bewildering to many of us. The idea that this is part of a conscious and organized political effort seems almost unbelievable. And obviously, avera...
"I'm Donald Trump and I approve this message."
She is the worst candidate for the libs since Dukakis. What sucks is that her supporters actually think she's got half a brain.
The main flaw in the left's bullshit is they argue "It's not a baby if I don't want it." But that's nonsense, of course. Intent doesn't change reality. A guy kills a pregnant woman and he's charged with two murders. Why? Oh she wanted that baby so it's murder in that case but not if she didn't want it. "It's a clump of cells" (so are you) but no one goes to a "clump of cells" shower. They go to a baby shower.
I agree with your statement above, Nole. However, I believe every single state has ruled at what point in a pregnancy a perpetrator can be charged for 2 murders. I'm guessing that none of those states have declared that point to be at 6 or 8 weeks. I've looked this up and the few I've found settled on around 20 -24 weeks in practice. Shouldn't state abortion laws be consistent with the murder statute? How can someone be charged with murder only after 22 weeks, let's say, but the mother and her physician be prosecuted for an abortion at 9 weeks, for example? The converse is also true. It's a second capital offense for a murderer at 20 weeks, but not an offense at all if the mother aborts the baby at 36 weeks (in some states)? Makes no sense to me. I believe the RNC should adopt this reasoning on this issue and, effectively, take this one issue away from the DNC. Way too many voters are going to use this one issue as a basis for their vote to the ultimate detriment of the entire US, imo. Matching the state laws for murder would take all the impact out of this issue. Again, imo.
Here is MN's law as an example and you can see how it directly contradicts the abortion law Walz signed. He should've been clubbed over the head with this by Vance in the debate. His own state's law says 'at any stage of development' a second charge may be brought. So, the mother has carte blanche to abort at any time with no consequences but an assailant can be charged with murder even if the mother didn't know she was pregnant or if she already had an appointment to abort the baby. Yeah, that makes sense.
Minnesota: Since 1986 the killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is murder (first, second, or third degree) or manslaughter, (first or second degree). It is also a felony to cause the death of an “unborn child” during the commission of a felony. Minn. Stat. Ann. §§609.266, 609.2661- 609.2665, 609.268(1) (West 1987).
I agree with your statement above, Nole. However, I believe every single state has ruled at what point in a pregnancy a perpetrator can be charged for 2 murders. I'm guessing that none of those states have declared that point to be at 6 or 8 weeks. I've looked this up and the few I've found settled on around 20 -24 weeks in practice. Shouldn't state abortion laws be consistent with the murder statute? How can someone be charged with murder only after 22 weeks, let's say, but the mother and her physician be prosecuted for an abortion at 9 weeks, for example? The converse is also true. It's a second capital offense for a murderer at 20 weeks, but not an offense at all if the mother aborts the baby at 36 weeks (in some states)? Makes no sense to me. I believe the RNC should adopt this reasoning on this issue and, effectively, take this one issue away from the DNC. Way too many voters are going to use this one issue as a basis for their vote to the ultimate detriment of the entire US, imo. Matching the state laws for murder would take all the impact out of this issue. Again, imo.
Here is MN's law as an example and you can see how it directly contradicts the abortion law Walz signed. He should've been clubbed over the head with this by Vance in the debate. His own state's law says 'at any stage of development' a second charge may be brought. So, the mother has carte blanche to abort at any time with no consequences but an assailant can be charged with murder even if the mother didn't know she was pregnant or if she already had an appointment to abort the baby. Yeah, that makes sense.
Minnesota: Since 1986 the killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is murder (first, second, or third degree) or manslaughter, (first or second degree). It is also a felony to cause the death of an “unborn child” during the commission of a felony. Minn. Stat. Ann. §§609.266, 609.2661- 609.2665, 609.268(1) (West 1987).
He needs to be behind bars.
Wow. They're gonna rub him out if he keeps this up
** Newsflash from the 'Holy Crap, You Gotta Be Joking' Department **
Cook Political Report shifts Wisconsin Senate race toward GOP .
<Insert evil laugh>
Call your Republican Congressman and tell them to get their lazy AZZ back to DC to pass funding for more payments to the hurricane victims. Congress sets the budget. Congress sets the 750 dollar amount.... Not Harris.
This, to me, is where things get interesting. In the 2020 fraud, they submitted thousands of ballots that were only for Biden. They going to do that again for Harris but not downballot again? The way things are going for them, that would be disastrous.
Wondering at what point key cogs in the fraud wheel decide the risk is not worth the reward. You have to be pretty goddam confident Kamabla is going to win and you aren’t going to get caught if you are going to participate in the democrat fraud at this point. After the Biden admin lawfare and years of pretending the fraud didn’t exist, you’d have to assume Trump’s DOJ will be throwing the book at everyone if he overcomes the margin of fraud.
Democrats hiring process:
She is...
-Woman
-Black
-Lesbian
SHE DESERVES THAT PROMOTION!
lol
Musk is a weird, autistic genius. Says cringy shit all the time. I don’t even need to watch the video.
I’ll take a weird autistic genius over a closeted flamboyant compulsive liar any day of the week.
When your former boss throws you under the bus. 😂 Maybe Joe kept that MAGA hat after all.
Good old National Proletariat Radio.
I still can't believe that the left actually thought he would casually forgetfully slip an N word slur during an interview with a major journalist.
It amazes me really what they think about run-of-the-mill conservatives who love this country.
Exactly. The danger of doing it exactly as they did before is greater.
I think there's a whole lotta Tism out there we don't even recognize as Tism.
Trump's inability to recognize inappropriate comments and behavior is most likely somewhere on the spectrum too. Probably why he and Elon jive so well together. My Autistic kids at school always bonded.
I'm truly not saying this as a disparaging viewpoint on Autism either. I have a family member who has Autism.
I think Musk and Trump are highly intelligent but VERY limited in scope. That is also a hallmark of Autism.
Just because you can fly rockets and create business models doesn't mean you will be a good politician or leader.
Kinda like doctors that fly planes.
Absolutely fascinating how an individual who rails so much against fascists and nazis seemingly embraces government bureaucracies being the arbiters of what or who is human. Ironic isn't? Must be a socialist thing. BTW, that is not what he is arguing and if you would have bothered reading his whole stupid diatribe, he was saying that fetus in the womb is not a human distinct from the mother. He then in Wile E Coyote fashion thought the IRS determination of being a dependent or having a social security number proved his thesis, while ignoring the scientific fact that a fetus has unique DNA separate and identifiable from the mothers. So no, his dumb twisted argument is not an argument on bureaucratic recognition for legal purposes but is in fact an argument if the unborn are even "humans" distinct from the mother. But this is par for the course with you two cartoons. You are so insufferably driven by your need to be right with your wildly inconsistent ideology, that you pervert, twist, and move goalposts to the point that you soon forget what your original argument was. I'm starting to wonder if you two are distinct individuals are separate from one another or do you carry the same social security number?
There are so many reasons to have hope for the future if Trump wins. I wish so many people on the left weren't so ignorant and/or downright stupid.
Similar threads
