One person issuing a statement doesn't equal the US Army, you nitwit.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
One person issuing a statement doesn't equal the US Army, you nitwit.
Yeah, caring about groceries more than human rights does make you a jerk. You nailed it.
What does the filibuster have to do with it? You keep.saying it's an overwhelming majority.
So go get you 60 votes and stfu
The Left doesn't just want to beat their opponents. They want to imprison them or worse.
Trump and Musk have both done what they have done knowing there is the possibility of huge financial loss the last few years. They have already tried/still trying to jail Trump...then the assassination attempt, so there is a lot more at stake than just finances now. I hope Musk has the best security.
Trump and Musk have both done what they have done knowing there is the possibility of huge financial loss the last few years. They have already tried/still trying to jail Trump...then the assassination attempt, so there is a lot more at stake than just finances now. I hope Musk has the best security.
Idiot, it's a non issue. 🙄
Yes, IF he was bashing weed, (he wasnt, just public smoking) not going to win him votes, or lose him any. He could say he supports it every which way from Sunday being legal, and communists like you still won't vote for him, so what are you chirping about?
Last I encountered there wasn’t a urine standard for weed. Friend had to do a blood test as urine is only metabolites and not active THC. For alcohol it’s .08 or .1 in most the states, we’re .08 right? Now that I’ve played your game, why does any of this matter? Walking around smoking weed isn’t hurting anyone.
Keg party.
Let's see how many times The Village Idiot uses this same phrase, unsubstantiated and dubious at best, in the next month.
Over/under guesses, gentlemen?
I say 45.
I said the overwhelming majority want a federal law. Not that all of them want the same law. I’ve been very specific in the terminology I’ve used. Did you look at the polls? 49% vs 37% vs 14%. Can any of those get a 60 vote filibuster proof majority strictly by support? Of course not. Politics would be played and certain individuals would have to be appealed to for their particular constituencies to make any progress. But it’s still a federal issue that will be fought over for the foreseeable future. This whole ‘leave it to the states’ angle is manufactured and doesn’t play with the American people.
A movie comes out shining a light on child trafficking...libs aren't happy. Shocker.
Bashing weed can absolutely lose him votes. Younger troll males that he does well with are highly into weed and video game culture. He was on Adin Ross’s stream with Xqc for Christ’s sake. Do you know who those people are? I do. I watch Twitch.
Which humans?
Which one, Dion?
The mother or the separate and distinct by biological definition and DNA baby/infant/fetus/clump of cells/embryo, whatever nomenclature you prefer?
Which one, commie boy?
Omg, you're actually absolutely completely clueless. Holy shit. 😳
Ok you got me to spend way too much time looking this up, so kudos. But now that I have, I absolutely hit it bang on, didn’t I? I should’ve mentioned the 5 nanograms per milliliter blood per se limit, but I was more focused on correcting your blood/urine confusion. But I nailed everything, from the testing method to the exact alcohol limit. So looks like I actually got more right off the top of my head than you did, the one who asked the question. So pray tell, what exactly are you talking about?
haha
(the look on Saban's face)
(the look on Saban's face)
Last edited:
You are a radical. Yes a handful of ultra libertarians and deadbeats are going to be proponents of open public drug use (for different reasons).
If you’re voting based on your desire for open public drug use, you’re not voting Trump anyway.
Most people would be fine with the ability to purchase and possess marijuana and thc products, but not smoke flower in public. Just eat a gummy or vape if you can’t get through the day without being high in public.
Do cults get to vote for their leader? Did you get to vote for giggles?
Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund fires back in response to Pelosi's attempts to deflect blame for Jan. 6: 'I am stunned' | Blaze Media
Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund denounces her National Guard claims, saying Pelosi stymied his requests for help.
www.theblaze.com
Last edited:
Embarrassing. Everything LIBS touch is corrupt and stained.
I know he never served in combat, but has he ever actually been to Afghanistan? He’s been lying so much, don’t need to spread this if he’s technically been there just never in combat.
It’s like you’re just spouting off without any idea of what he said. Trump said he supported the recreational use constitutional amendment that is going to be on the ballot here in Florida, but at the same time said the state needs to prepare so you don’t have people openly smoking in public where you can’t go down a city street without smelling weed (like in NYC).
Just as I alluded to earlier in the week, this place has you mentally unfit, arguing points that we never said.
YES YES YES! PLEASE, Kameltoe, samwise, Dion, KEEP UP your attacks on Trump and by extension the Gold Star families! It's working. No really! It is working! Keep going! This is a WINNING STRATEGY, I swear!
They posted the tweet. Did he release a public statement beyond that? Or are we talking about that tweet? Why do you think you have some right to not smell weed? “Here in Florida”. Are you really old?
Apropos of nothing whatever...Jaclyn Schmitz...would.
It’s like that Tucker Carlson video where he goes off on the journalist, initially giving her the benefit of the doubt that she’s just playing dumb, then the more she goes it’s obvious she’s just dumb.
It’s 100% clear what Trump said in his post. Everyone understands what he was saying. Yet Dion just doesn’t grasp the concept.
He either overreacted not having read Trump’s tweet and is now just digging in rather than admitting he’s wrong, or he can’t read.
Went back and read it again just to make sure. Here it is:
Have y’all read it? He doesn’t endorse jack squat. He says, “Whether people like it or not, this will happen…so it must be done correctly.” And then calls on the state legislature to pass laws restricting the will of the voters. While complaining about the smell. I don’t know what you read, but that’s definitely bashing. It’s like your takes are from twenty years ago and you’re amazed and delighted he didn’t just rant about locking users up.
Your media overlords are getting ready to tell you to let this one go Sam. You and Harris’ tweet writers are picking fights with Gold Star families. It’s a losing issue big time. I’d listen to them on this one.
So you think it’s the will of the Florida voters that medical marijuana use can be restricted in public places, but personal recreational consumption cannot be restricted?
Or do you think a reasonable interpretation of the provisions specifically addressing public use, and authorizing the legislature to pass laws consistent with the section, would be that congress is authorized to restrict open use of recreational marijuana consumption, not just medicinal use in public places?
Let it be live & he puts a plastic cup over the mic while it's her turn.
Last edited:
Same tired playbook: Harris trying to score political points by saying he was the one being political. They crawl in their own skin.
It also coincides with the rise of Silicon Valley leftists. No idea how the Am G characters racial makeup matches, or not, CA's makeup at the timeframe the movie was set. Please get some data & let me know or you don't have a point.
What percent of California was white in 1970?
76.3%
Non-Hispanic Whites have decreased from about 76.3% of the state's population in 1970 to 33.7% in 2022.
So you're saying for the future of the human race the the right to abortion is more important than eating?
That's their playbook for the rest of the states.What percent of California was white in 1970?
76.3%
Non-Hispanic Whites have decreased from about 76.3% of the state's population in 1970 to 33.7% in 2022.
I'll say it again: secession is the answer.
