ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Twenties and yes, if you know my post history you know I'm a history major who's researched the topics at hand extensively. Simply put current crony capitalism is broken. Mike Bloomberg has 64 billion dollars, more than 125 million Americans. Democracies thrive on an informed middle class, made up of workers. When the return on capital gets you more than your labor the parasitic owner class siphons off more and more from the workers actually doing the work and producing.

Bernie Sanders and the current American left are not advocating for seizing the means of production and a fully centrally planned economy. They're just fighting for universal healthcare and an expanded social safety net like the rest of the developed world to round off the rougher edges of capitalism. All this fear-mongering about Soviet Socialism is purely to appeal to your emotions so you vote in the economic interest of the billionaires, not yourself.
So Sanders also wants to extend all of these services to immigrants who come here illegally. Wants free college, and to ban Fracking on day one putting hundreds of thousands out of work with no means of transition in place for those people. He wants to pretty much double my taxes to pay for all of these programs. Programs that I have no skin in. What happens when my taxes suddenly double and I’m no longer able to afford the home I’ve worked hard for? What happens to all of us regular middle class joes who have reliable and decent paying jobs who just want to live our lives like we’ve been used to. What happens to all those workers that lose their jobs when the Fracking ban kicks in. Where do they go? Tell me which country has successfully implemented the systems Sanders wants to implement but also extends all of those systems to any and every person who enters the country illegally. Please tell me how that gets paid for.
 
Twenties and yes, if you know my post history you know I'm a history major who's researched the topics at hand extensively. Simply put current crony capitalism is broken. Mike Bloomberg has 64 billion dollars, more than 125 million Americans. Democracies thrive on an informed middle class, made up of workers. When the return on capital gets you more than your labor the parasitic owner class siphons off more and more from the workers actually doing the work and producing.

Bernie Sanders and the current American left are not advocating for seizing the means of production and a fully centrally planned economy. They're just fighting for universal healthcare and an expanded social safety net like the rest of the developed world to round off the rougher edges of capitalism. All this fear-mongering about Soviet Socialism is purely to appeal to your emotions so you vote in the economic interest of the billionaires, not yourself.
Oh, and what kind of job did that History degree land you? Just curious. What are the options for someone with that degree coming out of college?
 
I'm not after your guns. The 2nd amendment exists for a variety of legitimate reasons. I grew up in a hunting culture. A reasonable debate on where we draw the line though is needed. A hunting rifle and a nuke are not the same thing. Nobody thinks we have a constitutional right to all arms.
Drawing a line for gun control with today's socialist minded left is dangerous. The second amendment was put in the constitution to protect us against the type of government today's left wants. No compromises until socialist/fascist/communist attitudes are gone from this country
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gassy_Knowls
I said twenties. Haven't been a student for a good while. And again I have no student loans, Bernie's proposals wouldn't apply to me. Understanding economics and political science are integral to understanding history. I guarantee that you and the majority of this board have not actually read Marx yourself and have no idea what you're really railing at.
Haven't read the Koran but seen enough excepts from that book and Marx to not have to. Both are completely wrong headed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gassy_Knowls
lol does not shock me at all Dionysus is a college student pursuing a degree that has no value on the open market. Of course he wants Bernie to win to save him from his poor choices.

Maybe Dion should take an economics class. Maybe switch his major to something an employer will value so he isn't relying on Bernie to forgive his student loans.
As we’ve seen in the case of AOC, an economics degree will get you a job tending a bar.
 
I said twenties. Haven't been a student for a good while. And again I have no student loans, Bernie's proposals wouldn't apply to me. Understanding economics and political science are integral to understanding history. I guarantee that you and the majority of this board have not actually read Marx yourself and have no idea what you're really railing at.
But I guess you’ll be just perfectly fine being taxed into oblivion to pay for every body else’s education.
 
Oh so "Antifa nuts" have a constitutional right to own a nuke, as does every joe blow wife beater down the holler, and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev too? That libertarian wet dream is completely impractical and you know it, you're just arguing to argue.

Ok Proud Boy.
Yeah but, you antifa nut jobs would only use it on those who don't fight back like the elderly or people walking with their small children. Go somewhere where they fight back and you won't get a chance to use it.
 
That's pretty apocalyptic, the American economy existed before fracking and will exist after it. You're looking at the issue through a lens of what's good for "the economy" and by that you mean the stock market. We should be looking at every issue as what's good for the country, not the stock market.

Goddamnit. This is so wrong it's infuriating. "What's good for the country" is not destroying an industry that is damn near 10 ****ing percent of the GDP. An industry that employs millions of people (and has a preponderance of excellent-paying jobs available to people who may not have an education beyond high school) and of which fracking is a significant and rising portion of the industry. An industry that gives critical optionality to our leaders when it comes to foreign policy issues. An industry that pays many, many billions in taxes (at an effective rate way above that of most industries). An industry that has actually enabled the United States to cut carbon emissions the most of any country this century because LNG replacing coal is quite clean.

Sanders' idiotic proposition to ban fracking and oil and gas exports is one of the worst proposals of any President I can remember in my lifetime. It is also predictably stupid when two of the most critical states he has to win - Pennsylvania and Ohio - both have large energy sectors based off hydraulic fracturing.

I have a graduate degree in economics and work in a field in which I have to use it every day, and I think it's pretty clear you don't know what the hell you're talking about with this.
 
Last edited:
That's pretty apocalyptic, the American economy existed before fracking and will exist after it. You're looking at the issue through a lens of what's good for "the economy" and by that you mean the stock market. We should be looking at every issue as what's good for the country, not the stock market.
Destroying the economy is not good for the country. Just ask those who are fleeing other socialist style countries to come here or are they just coming here to get free stuff their country is not providing like food, water, housing, etc... oh, but they are getting free healthcare though. Are they? A free education maybe on how they will never have anything unless they fight for it or leave the country.
 
Last edited:
Yeah but, you antifa nut jobs would only use it on those who don't fight back like the elderly or people walking with their small children. Go somewhere where they fight back and you won't get a chance to use it.

Yeah I love those tough hooded dasturbs that like to blind-side old people or any who can't defend themselves. They be so tough... I wonder why they don't attack a group of young men who are ready??? Heck a group of young women too. They used to call that being a chicken schmidt...candy arse...
 
Many are born into generational grinding poverty in India, Africa, China and everywhere else as well as the US. We are not unique. It's the measures we take now that improve the lives of those in the future, not the conditions of the poverty we were born into. Some use that poverty as motivation to escape and better their circumstances. The majority are crushed by the weight of subsistence living and are never able to climb out of the repeating cycle.

In the history of the world, no economic system is better than capitalism when it comes to upward mobility. None. Not even close.

The freedom to get healthcare when you couldn't before is not a loss of freedom.

1) healthcare and health insurance are not the same thing. This is a strawman the left continue to use.

2) Neither are legal or constitutional rights. No one is entitled to them. Even yet everyone has some form of health insurance even if it's Medicaid.

So everyone that wants health insurance has it. They may not have the plan they want. But that's an even different issue.

Just a reminder. No socialist ever gives their own money first to the greater good.

They never give it at all. Libs always have great ideas for everyone else. Just like Bernie and his homes. Warren and her private jets. Countless examples
 
Many are born into generational grinding poverty in India, Africa, China and everywhere else as well as the US. We are not unique. It's the measures we take now that improve the lives of those in the future, not the conditions of the poverty we were born into. Some use that poverty as motivation to escape and better their circumstances. The majority are crushed by the weight of subsistence living and are never able to climb out of the repeating cycle.
Laziness for many will do that for them especially when enabled by socialist programs.
 
Goddamnit. This is so wrong it's infuriating. "What's good for the country" is not destroying an industry that is damn near 10 ****ing percent of the GDP. An industry that employs millions of people (and has a preponderance of excellent-paying jobs available to people who may not have an education beyond high school) and of which fracking is a significant and rising portion of the industry. An industry that gives critical optionality to our leaders when it comes to foreign policy issues. An industry that pays many, many billions in taxes (at an effective rate way above that of most industries). An industry that has actually enabled the United States to cut carbon emissions the most of any country this century because LNG replacing coal is quite clean.

Sanders' idiotic proposition to ban fracking and oil and gas exports is one of the worst proposals of any President I can remember in my lifetime. It is also predictably stupid when two of the most critical states he has to win - Pennsylvania and Ohio - both have large energy sectors based off hydraulic fracturing.

I have a graduate degree in economics and work in a field in which I have to use it every day, and I think it's pretty clear you don't know what the hell you're talking about with this.
I agree it's a long term position that would have negative local impact in the short term. That's why his proposal includes plans for transitioning those workers. You're thinking small. Doing away with private insurance will also destroy an industry that employees thousands. The question is whether these jobs should exist at all and then you worry about how to transition the people in them. As to getting votes in Ohio and Pennsylvania, yeah you're right. He's putting principle above personal interest. Exactly like a politician should.
 
Has more to do with liberal policies than anything else.

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. There are WHOLE lot more that need to be in jail.

You know who I blame? The legal system that is near taken over by liberal lawyers who never go by the letter of the law. They "plea" bargain. what does that do? It makes the lawyers MORE MONEY. (Yeah, judges too...)

IF you punished criminals to the fullest extent of the law a WHOLE lot of would be criminals would think twice before trying crime... Yeah, that's how it works...
 
I agree it's a long term position that would have negative local impact in the short term. That's why his proposal includes plans for transitioning those workers. You're thinking small. Doing away with private insurance will also destroy an industry that employees thousands. The question is whether these jobs should exist at all and then you worry about how to transition the people in them. As to getting votes in Ohio and Pennsylvania, yeah you're right. He's putting principle above personal interest. Exactly like a politician should.

So now you’re deciding which jobs should and should not exist? What’s the principle in destroying people’s livelihood?

You’re being played, Bernie isn’t going to eliminate fracking or fossil fuels, because he can’t. How long do you think people would go along with rolling blackouts? Which is exactly what you’d have if you go to all renewables.

He intends to tax the shit out of it, because he knows we have to have it. Does that sound swell to you?
 
So Sanders also wants to extend all of these services to immigrants who come here illegally. Wants free college, and to ban Fracking on day one putting hundreds of thousands out of work with no means of transition in place for those people. He wants to pretty much double my taxes to pay for all of these programs. Programs that I have no skin in. What happens when my taxes suddenly double and I’m no longer able to afford the home I’ve worked hard for? What happens to all of us regular middle class joes who have reliable and decent paying jobs who just want to live our lives like we’ve been used to. What happens to all those workers that lose their jobs when the Fracking ban kicks in. Where do they go? Tell me which country has successfully implemented the systems Sanders wants to implement but also extends all of those systems to any and every person who enters the country illegally. Please tell me how that gets paid for.
My retirement plans would be pushed into my 70's under a system opined for by Bernie because of taxation required for his plans. My plans to retire are within in the next 2 to 4 years as it stands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gassy_Knowls
I agree it's a long term position that would have negative local impact in the short term. That's why his proposal includes plans for transitioning those workers. You're thinking small. Doing away with private insurance will also destroy an industry that employees thousands. The question is whether these jobs should exist at all and then you worry about how to transition the people in them. As to getting votes in Ohio and Pennsylvania, yeah you're right. He's putting principle above personal interest. Exactly like a politician should.
False, he has no plan for transitioning only talk to get elected and then destroy the economy with ridiculous ideas that have never worked. Neither has he by the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gassy_Knowls
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. There are WHOLE lot more that need to be in jail.

You know who I blame? The legal system that is near taken over by liberal lawyers who never go by the letter of the law. They "plea" bargain. what does that do? It makes the lawyers MORE MONEY. (Yeah, judges too...)

IF you punished criminals to the fullest extent of the law a WHOLE lot of would be criminals would think twice before trying crime... Yeah, that's how it works...
Exactly
 
Uzkc3tb.jpeg



You are a total fraud. You're a history major that doesnt know anything about history. I ask an honest question regarding your vast historical knowledge and all I get in return are Bernie campaign talking points that have zero to do with the question asked. You dance around real questions rather than engage in a true debate or discussion.

Dont get me wrong though, I totally understand why you act in such a manner. When your position is as whacked out as yours, using real data wont get you very far. Therefore you must resort to diversion and degrading your opponent. I hoped to have a real discussion with an American socialist, but all I got was the normal drivel of DNC talking points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gassy_Knowls
I agree it's a long term position that would have negative local impact in the short term. That's why his proposal includes plans for transitioning those workers. You're thinking small. Doing away with private insurance will also destroy an industry that employees thousands. The question is whether these jobs should exist at all and then you worry about how to transition the people in them. As to getting votes in Ohio and Pennsylvania, yeah you're right. He's putting principle above personal interest. Exactly like a politician should.

Venezuela said that about energy too

went from the one of the best economies to a shit show
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT