LMAO is right. "Left the impression". So not only is this "exclusive" coming from super duper secret anon sources but apparently they're mind readers too.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Idiot. Blithering, drooling, idiot. Not surprised you believed that, more like, comforted.
Somebody had to point out the gavel to the brilliant AOC.
Also just to be absolutely clear that deal is all France and Iran. It has nothing to do with Trump/USA.
The reason Macron is trying to get Trump involved is because Macron needs Trump's assurance that they won't be sanctioned for doing so. Not a dime of that money will come from Trump/USA.
The reason Macron is trying to get Trump involved is because Macron needs Trump's assurance that they won't be sanctioned for doing so. Not a dime of that money will come from Trump/USA.
Why does France settle for Macron? Can't they afford a Beto or Bernie?
False: completely made up story to fit a conservative agenda
Wrong. It's the fault of the person using the device. Which also applies in gun scenarios.
Self owned
This makes zero sense. Is there anyone on here saying they agree with the banning of vaping? Ive only read people saying this was dumb by Trump to do this.
I know how I feel about this and Im sure many feel similar to this. They shouldn't have been banned, if the individual wants to take whatever risk that come with vaping, that is on the individual.
Like I said yesterday the Republican Party would be better off slowly merging with the libertarian party. Less stupid controlling shit like this, and more putting the choice and responsibilities on the individual the better.
Both parties today want to use big government to control you, neocons and neoliberals alike. They just disagree over what they want to spend your money on. Was Trump's budget fiscally conservative?
Last edited:
No and Ive bashed him for his spending many times. I do agree though it seems like the choice is really just really big government vs really really big government. Here is to hoping the republicans start turning a little more libertarian over the next few years.
Can you believe it, some of those who did not serve either for the same or worse reasons are the ones bitching the most.
Showing once again what has been posted time and again here, if she (AOC) or many liberals like her get control, our freedoms are gone.
Last edited:
Nope, completely true and shared to remind a certain poster that conservatism will not die out. In fact, most on here and I believe many of your leaders know that because of abortions (which affect liberals way more than conservatives) your numbers are going down which is why they need open borders and welcome the illegal vote. California is proof of this for me. Without California, the vote would probably never favor a Democrat again. Closing off the border (The Wall) would seal the deal.
Last edited:
Also, too long for me to make up. I don't have that good of an imagination.
WINNING BIGLY FOR THE GOOD GUYS!
Give them a few more years and liberals (even the ones on here) will say it never happened. Holocaust anyone?
Yep. Trump didn't serve. But Obama did. For the Kenyan fraction of the Al Queda army
Last edited:
And with NO pay. He is donating his time.
Neocons are shrinking, entitlements are booming. CBO has been warning of that boom for quite a while, your guy Bernie wants way more. And then add open borders to the lunacy.
Edit: Good example, Warren rolls out a $200/mo increase to SS this morning. Populist vote buying with zero math behind it.
Last edited:
like that would bother bushrod..Yep. Trump didn't serve. But Obama did. For the Kenyan fraction of the Al Queda army
Not wading back thru @jameslee32 dozen or so twitter shitposts but he and others ran with the NC vote lie yday. From a local reporter.
Last edited:
Not wading back thru @jameslee32 dozen or so twitter shitposts but he and others ran with the NC vote lie yday. From a local reporter.
Of course it was a lie. Jameslee knew it was a lie and he posted it anyway. He's one of the most dishonest posters to ever hit this board.
Vaping should never been approved so easily with so much unknown. The system failed on the front end.
Any ban should be temporary in nature until proper studies can be done.
Awful but it looks like it's in LA somewhere. Those people are a special kind of aloof. They don't know Kentucky is a state. I'm not even joking.
Any ban should be temporary in nature until proper studies can be done.
Awful but it looks like it's in LA somewhere. Those people are a special kind of aloof. They don't know Kentucky is a state. I'm not even joking.
Well you did say you’d vote for Trump if it comes down to it so yeah, you’re a nazi like the rest of us.
I don’t think he’s dishonest. He just believes what he wants to believe and truly believes it, despite all the evidence being to the contrary.
He probably still sits out milk and cookies for Santa.
** Ka-BOOM! **
US weekly jobless claims drop to five-month low.
- The number of Americans filing applications for unemployment benefits fell to a five-month low last week.
- The data suggested the labor market remains strong despite slowing job growth.
- Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped to 204,000 for the week ended September 7, the lowest level since April, the Labor Department said.
That goes for the right to bear arms as well, correct?
So how did
the special election turn out in North Carolina
Not a fair comparison: Mike should only be compared to other trannysSo how didthe special election turn out in North Carolina
This is a really good talk presented by Peter Zeihan at the trade convention of ECC, Engineers and Construction Contracting association.
He talks about the global order changing because our relatively new found energy independence, aging world populations, and how our trade negotiations are really going down.
This is not my area, but seems plausible. I know that if I watch a one-sided Netflix documentary or sleep at a Holiday Inn Express doesn't make me an expert.
I'd like input from finance guys. Is he close to being right?
It's an 45 minute talk, so save it for tonight.
He has three books out that I haven't read, but will now make an effort to do so.
Introduction completes at 1:36.
Q and A at the end is also interesting.
He talks about the global order changing because our relatively new found energy independence, aging world populations, and how our trade negotiations are really going down.
This is not my area, but seems plausible. I know that if I watch a one-sided Netflix documentary or sleep at a Holiday Inn Express doesn't make me an expert.
I'd like input from finance guys. Is he close to being right?
It's an 45 minute talk, so save it for tonight.
He has three books out that I haven't read, but will now make an effort to do so.
Introduction completes at 1:36.
Q and A at the end is also interesting.
Omar does nothing but talk about Palestine and the Middle East (and Israel of course) so why was there such an outrage about DT's "back where they come from" remark? She reps a district in MN.
