POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I don’t give a shit.
If news as entertainment is destroyed, maybe we can get back to some level of normalcy.
It’s cool when they call each other fredo. Just better not say fredo if you’re a white person.
and Trump says they are rioters that China needs to put down. Guess that flag doesnt really mean much
Their populations would explode along with methane flatulence. Then what? Send then to the sun to keep the flames going beyond it's current lifespan?
I always heard non-Italians can say it, just not with a hard "-o"
Your little nutjob friends are pushing the wrong buttons, Señor.
Suspect arrested after allegedly firing shots at ICE office.
Once again, you are dismissed.
Honestly, I'd probably have a beer and a bowl with 420.
I would do my best to never meet Ed. I have two young boys I have to look out for.
Last edited:
Empty threats? China agreed to move talks to this month instead of Next month. It's called good faith, you give me something, and I'll give you something in return.
It's also strategic, instead of having to react to a down turn economically, Trump now has a throttle control.
I feel bad for all the people out there actually named Fredo since the righteous left has suddenly decided for society that it's a derogatory ethnic slur.
Lake Tahoe Summit in 2016.
"As I was flying over the lake, I was thinking about Fredo," Obama said, jokingly, eliciting laughter from the crowd. "It's tough."
"As I was flying over the lake, I was thinking about Fredo," Obama said, jokingly, eliciting laughter from the crowd. "It's tough."
You would hate them to see their dad get bitch slapped around. They would never look at you the same.
Even with him dead, there still is the chick he worked with and probably a treasure chest of documents and videos that he had to blackmail everyone that went. There is no reason everyone involved in this shouldn't be taken down. But ya I assume in a couple months we will get a report released by the FBI that no information could be found and the case is closed.
Zero doubt the Feds will cover it up. Too many politicians and rich/famous people involved. Likely small fish will be sacrificed to protect the big fish. Do not trust the FBI one bit.
That's a lie. ICE's job is to go after all illegal immigrants. They just prioritize the violent criminals. That doesn't mean they ignore the laws for non violent ones. They are subject to deportation just like the violent ones.
Oh and ICE is also creating jobs for Americans who are looking for work.
I'm hopeful but not optimistic. You don't move the mountains they just moved unless you know that eliminates all exposure. Otherwise all the other sources of info would be removed previously or don't exist to the extent one might think
Surprised the Post hasn't decommissioned this link....
I used to think gun control was the answer. My research told me otherwise.
By Leah Libresco
October 3, 2017
Leah Libresco is a statistician and former newswriter at FiveThirtyEight, a data journalism site. She is the author of "Arriving at Amen."
Before I started researching gun deaths, gun-control policy used to frustrate me. I wished the National Rifle Association would stop blocking common-sense gun-control reforms such as banning assault weapons, restricting silencers, shrinking magazine sizes and all the other measures that could make guns less deadly.
Then, my colleagues and I at FiveThirtyEight spent three months analyzing all 33,000 lives ended by guns each year in the United States, and I wound up frustrated in a whole new way. We looked at what interventions might have saved those people, and the case for the policies I'd lobbied for crumbled when I examined the evidence. The best ideas left standing were narrowly tailored interventions to protect subtypes of potential victims, not broad attempts to limit the lethality of guns.
I researched the strictly tightened gun laws in Britain and Australia and concluded that they didn't prove much about what America's policy should be. Neither nation experienced drops in mass shootings or other gun related-crime that could be attributed to their buybacks and bans. Mass shootings were too rare in Australia for their absence after the buyback program to be clear evidence of progress. And in both Australia and Britain, the gun restrictions had an ambiguous effect on other gun-related crimes or deaths.
When I looked at the other oft-praised policies, I found out that no gunowner walks into the store to buy an "assault weapon." It's an invented classification that includes any semi-automatic that has two or more features, such as a bayonet mount, arocket-propelled grenade-launcher mount, a folding stock or a pistol grip. But guns are modular, and any hobbyist can easily add these features at home, just as if they were snapping together Legos.
.......
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...3edca6-a851-11e7-92d1-58c702d2d975_story.html
I used to think gun control was the answer. My research told me otherwise.
By Leah Libresco
October 3, 2017
Leah Libresco is a statistician and former newswriter at FiveThirtyEight, a data journalism site. She is the author of "Arriving at Amen."
Before I started researching gun deaths, gun-control policy used to frustrate me. I wished the National Rifle Association would stop blocking common-sense gun-control reforms such as banning assault weapons, restricting silencers, shrinking magazine sizes and all the other measures that could make guns less deadly.
Then, my colleagues and I at FiveThirtyEight spent three months analyzing all 33,000 lives ended by guns each year in the United States, and I wound up frustrated in a whole new way. We looked at what interventions might have saved those people, and the case for the policies I'd lobbied for crumbled when I examined the evidence. The best ideas left standing were narrowly tailored interventions to protect subtypes of potential victims, not broad attempts to limit the lethality of guns.
I researched the strictly tightened gun laws in Britain and Australia and concluded that they didn't prove much about what America's policy should be. Neither nation experienced drops in mass shootings or other gun related-crime that could be attributed to their buybacks and bans. Mass shootings were too rare in Australia for their absence after the buyback program to be clear evidence of progress. And in both Australia and Britain, the gun restrictions had an ambiguous effect on other gun-related crimes or deaths.
When I looked at the other oft-praised policies, I found out that no gunowner walks into the store to buy an "assault weapon." It's an invented classification that includes any semi-automatic that has two or more features, such as a bayonet mount, arocket-propelled grenade-launcher mount, a folding stock or a pistol grip. But guns are modular, and any hobbyist can easily add these features at home, just as if they were snapping together Legos.
.......
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...3edca6-a851-11e7-92d1-58c702d2d975_story.html
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Um, what? Huh? Karl Ravech talking about the SEC- Latest: the nail at the foul line
-
-
-
