90K votes difference across three states out of some 130M+ is dam close.
Bill isn’t so good w numbers.
90K votes difference across three states out of some 130M+ is dam close.
He does that to troll you hyperbolic morons, aka satire, but extremely weird that you care about arguing whether HRC won the popular vote which is really only relevant for those who can't accept the Dems lostWas not passionately defending Hilary in the least bit. More like calling out Gassy for making up shit once again. Dude pussed out and wouldn’t man up to bet Baller. Just get sick of him making up stuff all the time. Lady was a train wreck for the Dems
Bill isn’t so good w numbers.
With the growth in analytics the GOP should do a lot more to highlight the insane level of bias with data.
Speaking of Brexit, did Fox News and the repugs cause that too? Or Russia?
Speaking of Brexit, did Fox News and the repugs cause that too? Or Russia?
Hollywood is boycotting his hotels, he will get his shit together.It was the Sultan of Brunei.
The first was around his nomination, judging by the lefty rationale used on catpaw that adds up.Read this morning on Reddit that it was Trump's election that caused the vote to go the way it did.
But but but Hilary ALMOST won.
Lol you goddam loony toons. Get over it.
90K votes difference across three states out of some 130M+ is dam close.
Those States were close, the election wasn’t.
Had those 3 states flipped for Clinton she still loses the election.
Clinton had 227 electoral college votes. Had she won Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania she would have had 273 and won the election.
@Joerules19 thinks JW is a conspiracy theory pushing organization who never cites their "sources"? I mean, WTF? Just goes to show how little concern they have for the truth. As mentioned several times now, their "source" is the god damned federal government and their documents. For f*cks sake. Again, you'd think libertarians/moderates would support the efforts of real investigative journalists who have to sue the federal government under the FOIA to obtain real documents and real information.
Still no resident moderates/libertarians praising Trump for his transparency? Thought they'd be all over that.
@420 Bro - the gang and I have decided to head to DC to celebrate/dance in the streets when that first top democrat traitor heads to prison. We also have a pool going on who the first one will be. Exciting times!
And @ballerstu2u still hasn't figured out Gassy is simply using the trolling methods of the left against him. LOL.
Where's Obama? He knew.
And she was too f'n lazy to go thereClinton had 227 electoral college votes. Had she won Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania she would have had 273 and won the election.
And she was too f'n lazy to go there
Was not passionately defending Hilary in the least bit. More like calling out Gassy for making up shit once again. Dude pussed out and wouldn’t man up to bet Baller. Just get sick of him making up stuff all the time. Lady was a train wreck for the Dems
Now see, that’s your mistake. Mentioning common sense to a lib/dim. Might as well try to tell them there are only 2 genders.Not a source, and can’t confirm the number, but common sense says it’s happening.
if we have sanctuary for illegals set up in different cities/states across the country where these cities/states help these illegals evade justice, even if they’re a wanted criminal (some with other crimes committed besides entering the country illegally)... and we're supposed to believe these people aren’t being allowed to vote because that would be wrong?
Come on man.
Will be interesting to see what this is.
1. The election is decided by popular vote - per state. You have explained & need to explain nothing. 2. It's still dam close if it's 90K out of the 13M+ votes in those three states - like 0.7%. What nitpicking.Seems like if someone was good with numbers, they wouldn't have said 90k votes across 3 states, then jumped to talking about total number of voters. Seems like a better number to look at would be voters in those 3 states. And separately, not together.
I don't know how many times we can explain it, the United States presidential election is not determined by popular vote. Take a civics class.
I’m sure it isn’t biased , that’s money that people earn and politicians get if they raise taxes ,https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...my-gdp-jobs-act-congress-report-a8934256.html
https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45736.html
Congressional tax cut review. Hasn't raised growth or wages at any measurable level. Is paying for itself at a 5% rate. Did raise investment but all of that went into stock buyback. Basically exactly what everyone expected it to do. It was a nice cash grab for the GOPs filthy rich donors.
1. The election is decided by popular vote - per state. You have explained & need to explain nothing. 2. It's still dam close if it's 90K out of the 13M+ votes in those three states - like 0.7%. What nitpicking.
What you & others don't want to face is that Trump squeaked thru. That is the fact. & I'm quite happy about that.
It was extremely close. Every time a Prez is elected without the plurality of popular votes it's close by definition. How many times does that have to be explained to you? Or is only Bush-Gore 2000 close in your mind?I stand corrected, the point still stands though. The election wasn’t close, 3 states that hadn’t voted Republican since the 80’s went for Trump.
Yet you keep commenting on the subject.Ha. I don't give a shit if Trump won by 1 vote or 100 million.
FalseIt was extremely close. Every time a Prez is elected without the plurality of popular votes it's close by definition. How many times does that have to be explained to you? Or is only Bush-Gore 2000 close in your mind?
Speaking of 5%, why don't you explain how you only paid a 5% net effective rate? How can you complain about the govt not getting enough money at the same time bragging about cheating on your taxes?https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...my-gdp-jobs-act-congress-report-a8934256.html
https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45736.html
Congressional tax cut review. Hasn't raised growth or wages at any measurable level. Is paying for itself at a 5% rate. Did raise investment but all of that went into stock buyback. Basically exactly what everyone expected it to do. It was a nice cash grab for the GOPs filthy rich donors.
Yet you keep commenting on the subject.
It was extremely close. Every time a Prez is elected without the plurality of popular votes it's close by definition. How many times does that have to be explained to you? Or is only Bush-Gore 2000 close in your mind?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...my-gdp-jobs-act-congress-report-a8934256.html
https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45736.html
Congressional tax cut review. Hasn't raised growth or wages at any measurable level. Is paying for itself at a 5% rate. Did raise investment but all of that went into stock buyback. Basically exactly what everyone expected it to do. It was a nice cash grab for the GOPs filthy rich donors.