Everybody can't be an indian chief, chief.
Without labor, nothing can be built. What has changed, and what needs to be reversed is the value placed on labor.
Just because someone will do something for less doesn't always mean that the cheaper source of labor must be used. Business has to think about who is going to purchase its product. I like to use the Henry Ford example...at a time that other manufacturers were paying less than $2.50/day for wages Ford made the bold move to raise wages to $5/week over doubling their pay. He was widely criticized for doing so by the other business tycoons of his day. They even called him a "socialist". But by paying his workers more, his workers were then able to purchase the products that they were making. Profits doubled because those workers were able to pump twice as much into the economy which helped others earn and spend more...and buy more Fords which allowed Henry to earn more than if he had continued to pay lesser wages.
Business today is too worried about making as much this quarter as possible and worrying about the next quarter when it arrives. Wages paid don't disappear. They get spent over and over again helping make all businesses and communities stronger. It also benefits the business through improved employee moral, lowering turnover, retraining costs and the inefficiencies that go with it.
When the top 1% own 35% of the wealth...the top 5% own 65% and the bottom 60% have less than 5% of the nation's wealth there isn't a whole lot out there to go get. The Forbes 400 alone own more wealth than the bottom half combined.
The Walton kids didn't "go get it", it was handed to them as it was with about half of the 400.