POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
It gets better. Jones has absolutely nothing to do with the station. It's not his "flagship" anything. It was a random illegal station that just so happened to broadcast Jones' show, among other broadcasts. The fake news media, as always, was purposely misinforming, making it seem like it was something that it wasn't.
AP Launches Media Hoax Claiming Alex Jones’ Radio Station Shut Down
Update: The Hill has issued a correction to its article after we pointed out that Alex Jones does not own, operate or have any relationship with the Austin, Texas, radio station recently shut down by the FCC:
Update #2: FCC Chairman said the following:
It is important to make clear that our pirate radio enforcement efforts — including this one — have nothing to do with the content of pirate radio stations air. We act against pirate radio stations because they are violating the law by broadcasting on the FM airwaves without a license.
As a content provider, Alex Jones and Infowars is not affiliated in any official capacity with the radio station recently shut down by the FCC, and it doesn’t appear that any journalists who inaccurately reported this e-mailed us for comment prior to running this false story.
Mr. Jones does not own, operate, or have any relationship with that radio station or its owners. It is not his “flagship” station, and as the FCC will confirm, the FCC’s actions were in no way related to the fact that the station may have broadcast Mr. Jones’ programs in the past. The FCC has acted against the station’s owners because of its operation without a license, in violation of FCC rules. This has absolutely nothing to do with Mr. Jones and his programming. Recent news articles convey the entirely false implication that the FCC’s actions were directed against Mr. Jones.
In short, Mr. Jones has no involvement in the ownership, operation, or conduct by the radio station, and it is not his “flagship” station.
It gets better. Jones has absolutely nothing to do with the station. It's not his "flagship" anything. It was a random illegal station that just so happened to broadcast Jones' show, among other broadcasts. The fake news media, as always, was purposely misinforming, making it seem like it was something that it wasn't.
AP Launches Media Hoax Claiming Alex Jones’ Radio Station Shut Down
Update: The Hill has issued a correction to its article after we pointed out that Alex Jones does not own, operate or have any relationship with the Austin, Texas, radio station recently shut down by the FCC:
Update #2: FCC Chairman said the following:
It is important to make clear that our pirate radio enforcement efforts — including this one — have nothing to do with the content of pirate radio stations air. We act against pirate radio stations because they are violating the law by broadcasting on the FM airwaves without a license.
As a content provider, Alex Jones and Infowars is not affiliated in any official capacity with the radio station recently shut down by the FCC, and it doesn’t appear that any journalists who inaccurately reported this e-mailed us for comment prior to running this false story.
Mr. Jones does not own, operate, or have any relationship with that radio station or its owners. It is not his “flagship” station, and as the FCC will confirm, the FCC’s actions were in no way related to the fact that the station may have broadcast Mr. Jones’ programs in the past. The FCC has acted against the station’s owners because of its operation without a license, in violation of FCC rules. This has absolutely nothing to do with Mr. Jones and his programming. Recent news articles convey the entirely false implication that the FCC’s actions were directed against Mr. Jones.
In short, Mr. Jones has no involvement in the ownership, operation, or conduct by the radio station, and it is not his “flagship” station.
Lol how pathetic. The slightest bit of investigation would've revealed that
Trump-supporting Pentagon analyst stripped of security clearance after Stefan Halper complaints
A Trump-supporting Pentagon analyst was stripped of his security clearance by Obama-appointed officials after he complained of questionable government contracts to Stefan Halper, the FBI informant who spied on the Trump presidential campaign.
Adam Lovinger, a 12-year strategist in the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment, complained to his bosses about Halper contracts in the fall of 2016, his attorney, Sean M. Bigley, told The Washington Times.
Mr. Bigley filed a complaint July 18 with the Pentagon’s senior ethics official, charging that Mr. Lovinger’s superiors misused the security clearance process to punish him. He said his client complained about excessive “sweetheart” deals for Mr. Halper and for a “best friend” of Chelsea Clinton.
In an internal October 2016 email to higher-ups, Mr. Lovinger wrote of “the moral hazard associated with the Washington Headquarters Services contracting with Stefan Halper,” the complaint said. It said Mr. Baker hired Mr. Halper to “conduct foreign relations,” a job that should be confined to government officials.
“It was a topic of conversation within the office,” Mr. Bigley told The Times. “What is Halper doing, and why is he being paid astronomically more than others similarly situated?”
“Nobody in the office seemed to know what Halper was doing for his money,” Mr. Bigley said. “Adam said Jim Baker, the director, kept Halper’s contracts very close to the vest. And nobody seemed to have any idea what he was doing at the time. He subcontracted out a good chunk of it to other academics. He would compile them all and then collect the balance as his fee as a middleman. That was very unusual.”
A Trump-supporting Pentagon analyst was stripped of his security clearance by Obama-appointed officials after he complained of questionable government contracts to Stefan Halper, the FBI informant who spied on the Trump presidential campaign.
Adam Lovinger, a 12-year strategist in the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment, complained to his bosses about Halper contracts in the fall of 2016, his attorney, Sean M. Bigley, told The Washington Times.
Mr. Bigley filed a complaint July 18 with the Pentagon’s senior ethics official, charging that Mr. Lovinger’s superiors misused the security clearance process to punish him. He said his client complained about excessive “sweetheart” deals for Mr. Halper and for a “best friend” of Chelsea Clinton.
In an internal October 2016 email to higher-ups, Mr. Lovinger wrote of “the moral hazard associated with the Washington Headquarters Services contracting with Stefan Halper,” the complaint said. It said Mr. Baker hired Mr. Halper to “conduct foreign relations,” a job that should be confined to government officials.
“It was a topic of conversation within the office,” Mr. Bigley told The Times. “What is Halper doing, and why is he being paid astronomically more than others similarly situated?”
“Nobody in the office seemed to know what Halper was doing for his money,” Mr. Bigley said. “Adam said Jim Baker, the director, kept Halper’s contracts very close to the vest. And nobody seemed to have any idea what he was doing at the time. He subcontracted out a good chunk of it to other academics. He would compile them all and then collect the balance as his fee as a middleman. That was very unusual.”
And lets pretend he would. Would taking his security clearance somehow wipe his memory of whatever it was from his time as CIA director he was being consulted about?
Need tp post this weekly to remind everyone how stupid these libs are. Chuck Todd really is a sleepy eyed son of a bitch.
Reported cost is not true but, that is the normal lie you left wing nut jobs are ready to believe.
That is actually how it is done and has been for as long as I can remember. I have had a pretty high clearance in the past while stationed with a unit that required it but, as soon as I moved on to the next unit it was down graded to the level required for that unit. As soon as I retired it was taken away. I now have one in the current job I hold at FT. Sill.
Last edited:
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
The media's taking it on the chin this week more than Stormy Daniels.
I have a question, isn't recording a conversation with someone without their knowledge or permission illegal?! Especially since it's the highest ranking law enforcement officer in the country!!
Nothing gets me more than a fair unbiased debate moderator crying when Trump wins. Martha Raddatz is such a fair journalist.
39 states are single party states but I have no idea what that means for classified information from inside the WH.
Everyone in Washington DC should be forced to wear body cams at all times.
Can't imagine secretly recording white house conversations is legal. But I don't know that for sure.
Seems it could be espionage or something similar.
Well the left got their wish. Trump canceled the ceremony to honor the veterans who've fought so hard for this country.
Honestly was looking forward to Antifa showing up to that one.
Honestly was looking forward to Antifa showing up to that one.
Of course any objective person got a good laugh at the msm for their 300+ outlet coordinated attack on trump, arguing they weren't colluding against trump. Oh, the irony.
But there's more.
Obviously that many outlets didn't organically all decide to attack on the same issue all on the same day. Of course paired with a hashtag that was pushed to the top of Twitter due to all the bot like interactions from blue checks.
It was all coordinated, obviously. Who coordinated it? THAT should be the story. Obvious answer is media matters. But who knows
But there's more.
Obviously that many outlets didn't organically all decide to attack on the same issue all on the same day. Of course paired with a hashtag that was pushed to the top of Twitter due to all the bot like interactions from blue checks.
It was all coordinated, obviously. Who coordinated it? THAT should be the story. Obvious answer is media matters. But who knows
Trump shouldn't have caved in to these idiots. Their all deplorables and should be shipped to the middle east where they belong.
If you have no pride or respect for this country and its history then GTFO.
Off topic but Gary Allen put on a good show at the fair last night. Long legs and cowboy boots were everywhere you looked.
Dont wanna break the code but I dont know how to post a picture on here but you can type Shania Twain from the 90s to get an idea.
Off topic but Gary Allen put on a good show at the fair last night. Long legs and cowboy boots were everywhere you looked.
Dont wanna break the code but I dont know how to post a picture on here but you can type Shania Twain from the 90s to get an idea.
Every single thing about this is amazing. The fact that these kids are on a great path, that Trump recognized them for same, that the kid realizes Trump is steamrolling folks, and (honestly, maybe the first time I've seen) Trump getting surprised/excited by the kid's response.
Helping the black community recover from decades of induced dependency from Dems and cultural rot just to own the libs
The 2 largest Vet groups had already told Trump they didn't want a dime wasted on a parade in their honor. They want that money going to fix the VA or help homeless vets.
It gets better. Jones has absolutely nothing to do with the station. It's not his "flagship" anything. It was a random illegal station that just so happened to broadcast Jones' show, among other broadcasts. The fake news media, as always, was purposely misinforming, making it seem like it was something that it wasn't.
AP Launches Media Hoax Claiming Alex Jones’ Radio Station Shut Down
Update: The Hill has issued a correction to its article after we pointed out that Alex Jones does not own, operate or have any relationship with the Austin, Texas, radio station recently shut down by the FCC:
Update #2: FCC Chairman said the following:
It is important to make clear that our pirate radio enforcement efforts — including this one — have nothing to do with the content of pirate radio stations air. We act against pirate radio stations because they are violating the law by broadcasting on the FM airwaves without a license.
As a content provider, Alex Jones and Infowars is not affiliated in any official capacity with the radio station recently shut down by the FCC, and it doesn’t appear that any journalists who inaccurately reported this e-mailed us for comment prior to running this false story.
Mr. Jones does not own, operate, or have any relationship with that radio station or its owners. It is not his “flagship” station, and as the FCC will confirm, the FCC’s actions were in no way related to the fact that the station may have broadcast Mr. Jones’ programs in the past. The FCC has acted against the station’s owners because of its operation without a license, in violation of FCC rules. This has absolutely nothing to do with Mr. Jones and his programming. Recent news articles convey the entirely false implication that the FCC’s actions were directed against Mr. Jones.
In short, Mr. Jones has no involvement in the ownership, operation, or conduct by the radio station, and it is not his “flagship” station.
From that article:
...and it doesn’t appear that any journalists who inaccurately reported this e-mailed us for comment prior to running this false story.
That sums up the majority of these hit pieces. They do absolutely no fact checking whatsoever and then run an emotionally charged bashing of someone or something they don't agree with.
Original story gets 10,000,000 hits. And then they sometimes run a half-assed "correction" story days or weeks later...that gets maybe 2k hits...usually less. Damage done.
It's all part of their strategy. And it's pathetic. Especially since they never actually admit that they didn't fact check...even in the correction story. And it's exactly why this stuff gets called out as fake news.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-sa...ing-confidentiality-agreements-025613573.html
Trump got his NDA shredded in court. Judge said it was so poorly written he had no choice but to ignore it.
Trump got his NDA shredded in court. Judge said it was so poorly written he had no choice but to ignore it.
There was no extra money involved, at least from the military perspective. Every single soldier, piece of equipment, or hardware is already bought, or will be paid anyway. The military expense to the public didn't change a cent whether the parade took place or not, the VA isn't going to get more money by not having the parade, or less if they did have it, it's a separate entity altogether.
How in God's name can a military parade in our nations capital, on Veteran's day which also is the 100th anniversary of the end of WWI make lefties so mad?
It's like Trump anger blinds you to any thing else at all, the parade wasn't about Trump, it was about celebrating the nations military, and veterans.
