ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Good news guys! Remember that Las Vegas shooting? Finally, after months and months of police work, they wrapped things up and concluded...they know jack squat. The highlight of the CBS Evening News coverage - “Paddock’s primary doctor says he was odd and probably bipolar”....roflmao. Sounds exactly like something a doctor would say.

Also in the news: illegal alien of 20 years married to a American marine was deported because she didn’t follow the rules. Huge sob story segment, full of heavy hearts....except her husband who they did not interview, simply said he was a Trump voter and did not blame Trump. LOL. Sounds like that marine understands what law and order is. Too bad his wife didn’t want to check in with immigration twice a year. Guess she thought she was special because she’s illegal.
 

How in the hell does a Federal Judge have the authority to prevent a President from rescinding an Executive Order? Then force them a President to reinstate it fully?

It isn’t a law, that’s the whole point of EO’s.

Has this ever happened in US History, a judge preventing a President from removing an EO?
 
Manafort going to prison. His tax guy just ****ed him good. Once the banker takes the stand he's guilty on all counts.

Ayliff's firm asked Manafort directly in an email in 2011 if he, or his wife, or two daughters had foreign accounts.

Manafort said no, according to an email shown to the jury.
Fine. What's that got to do with the election interference?
 
If firing Comey wasn't an open and shut case, thousands of Tweets pretty much does it.

And typically, his ignorance about the attack on the country is nothing short of derelict of duty. Not something voters look for in a commander in chief. It's really the opposite of leadership.

What attack? You mean the “attack” that happened under Obama’s watch, yet somehow he gets zero blame?

Gimme a f*cking break, you’re being played for a fool, and you’ve swallowed hook, line and sinker.

What’s going to happen is exactly what the Hill reported, Mueller is going to concoct some cockamamie obstruction of justice right before midterms. All in order to protect the justice dept from their failures and corruption under the last admin. Hoping it pushes the Dems to the House and puts Trump in the cross hairs, and you’re good with that.
I’d be ashamed if I accepted the government operating like that.
 
Get a load of this crazy. Enforcing the law is illegal, breaking the law is not illegal. Candidate for NYAG is campaigning on prosecuting ICE agents "for their criminal acts."

Seriously, wrap your head around that. This woman thinks she can be NY's next top law enforcement officer by running on advocating for lawlessness and prosecuting law enforcement. NY isn't that f***ed, is it?
She's thinking clear-headedly - for NY.
 
Saw D’Souza’s movie. Imagine if the left wasn’t brainwashed enough and got a history lesson about their party’s connection to fascism and the darkest shit in our nation’s history and modern day.

Leave it to the left to claim to be the good guys while wanting to beat the crap out of those who oppose them, steal your money and trying to stage a coup.
 
What attack? You mean the “attack” that happened under Obama’s watch, yet somehow he gets zero blame?
And the investigation started a year ago. When Comey got fired for having the FBI investigate it, Rosenstein did what any AG should do. He hired a Special Council and let him do his job. Sorry it makes your boy look bad.

911 happened under Bush's watch as well. When it can't be prevented, it's what you do about it that matters.
 

How in the hell does a Federal Judge have the authority to prevent a President from rescinding an Executive Order? Then force them a President to reinstate it fully?

It isn’t a law, that’s the whole point of EO’s.

Has this ever happened in US History, a judge preventing a President from removing an EO?

Another ruling that will be reversed easily. Ridiculous
 
They completely contradict their own reporting. That's some hard hitting journalism...

Why is President Trump escalating his attacks against special counsel counsel Robert Mueller, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Department of Justice, the FBI and the free press to a fever pitch in recent days?

The reason is that the odds are very high that Mueller will offer a declarative public statement before the midterm elections, and very likely before Labor Day, that the president is guilty of obstruction of justice.

The Mueller declaration of obstruction of justice could be issued in the form of a letter to Congress and may or may not ultimately be issued in the form of an indictment if he believes that the Trump situation creates extraordinary circumstances that warrant his seeking approval for a formal indictment.

It is impossible to know exactly what Mueller will do. We do not know the evidence he has that has not yet been made public. We do not know his private thinking on great matters of state and law that will govern his actions.
Nothing unsurprising if it happens. I've expected something like that from the Dem "special" prosecutors for months & have said so here several times. Of course Mueller, after two years, would time a report against Trump just prior to an election. Now that's real collusion.
 
And the investigation started a year ago. When Comey got fired for having the FBI investigate it, Rosenstein did what any AG should do. He hired a Special Council and let him do his job. Sorry it makes your boy look bad.

911 happened under Bush's watch as well. When it can't be prevented, it's what you do about it that matters.

so much ignorance it is hard to digest.

like Bill "the child rapists" Clinton ordering a few tomahawks to be fired into the mountainside in 98 when he knew Bin Laden was a threat. Barry drawing a red line in the sand to Putin?

Trump is swinging the big ole fat American stick around and the world knows it.
 
How in the hell does a Federal Judge have the authority to prevent a President from rescinding an Executive Order? Then force them a President to reinstate it fully?

It isn’t a law, that’s the whole point of EO’s.

Has this ever happened in US History, a judge preventing a President from removing an EO?
I don't understand that either. Senseless.
 
What attack? You mean the “attack” that happened under Obama’s watch, yet somehow he gets zero blame?

Gimme a f*cking break, you’re being played for a fool, and you’ve swallowed hook, line and sinker.

What’s going to happen is exactly what the Hill reported, Mueller is going to concoct some cockamamie obstruction of justice right before midterms. All in order to protect the justice dept from their failures and corruption under the last admin. Hoping it pushes the Dems to the House and puts Trump in the cross hairs, and you’re good with that.
I’d be ashamed if I accepted the government operating like that.
giphy.gif
 
Rosenstein did what any AG should do.

Rosenstein wrote the recommendation letter to fire Comey. If Trump is guilty of obstruction for firing Comey then Sessions, who also wrote a recommendation letter of his own, and Rosenstein are Trump's accomplices.
 
When it can't be prevented, it's what you do about it that matters.

Except it could've been prevented. The Obama administration was aware back in '15. Obama's cybersecurity chief went to him with a plan to stop it. Obama chose to do nothing and gave him the stand down order.

Did you happen to catch what Trump's cybersecurity chief said at the press briefing yesterday?

Reporter - "General, have you been authorized by the president take any offensive cyber measures?"

General - "My direction from the president has been very clear. We are not going to accept election meddling, period. It's very unambiguous."
 
Nothing unsurprising if it happens. I've expected something like that from the Dem "special" prosecutors for months & have said so here several times. Of course Mueller, after two years, would time a report against Trump just prior to an election. Now that's real collusion.

Mueller is a dirty cop. Worrying about being civil with this bunch is crazy considering what they have tried to do and still do.

This should have ended. There’s been more than enough time for this bogus bullshit that was started under false pretenses.

Democrats lost an election because they are awful. It’s that simple.
 
Love this (long):

"I don’t much like Donald Trump(Me neither.) and didn’t vote for him (or Hillary) in 2016, but I’ve been feeling sorry for him for about 18 months now. It feels strange feeling sorry for someone who’s a boor, a narcissist, an egomaniac, and a serial philanderer, plus the 37 other negative traits usually used to describe him. But it has something to do with the fact that he has been treated in a grossly unfair manner by the mainstream media and the political and cultural left, on a scale we’ve never seen before.

One story of the last two years is how this most alpha of alpha males has become an underdog of sorts in American politics today. Of course, you won’t find this narrative in any of the mainstream media outlets.This narrative merely exists in the minds of millions of voters who are outside the core Democratic base: those of us who are Republicans, moderates, independents, former Democrats like myself. We’ve been silently watching, listening, observing the opposition to Trump in the last eighteen months, and it’s been the most sickening thing to see, more appalling than what the right did to President Obama.

As one voter put it in an article I read a while ago, the hatred shown toward Trump has been “un-American.” I agree with that sentiment, even as I simultaneously hold the thought that Trump is not someone whose character needs defending.

Memo to the left: Know why Trump’s poll numbers have been steady or rising slightly in spite of the invective you’ve been pouring on him every minute of every day? It’s because the economy is booming, and also because most Americans are fair-minded and think that even a flawed sinner like Trump doesn’t deserve to be figuratively kicked every day in a manner that’s often dishonest, exaggerated or out-of-context.

Trump ran as the most anti- of anti-establishment candidates in 2016, and almost everything the political and media establishments have done since then have confirmed what millions of voters have realized: these establishments are out-of-control, they want presidential candidates and presidents they can control, and they won’t abide a true outsider.

In effect, their post-election behavior has confirmed that a President Trump was necessary for this time in American politics. The reality is, there was no peaceful transition of power on Jan. 20, 2017. From the time Trump won the Republican nomination, there has been a concerted effort from different quarters – the press, Hollywood, academia, the Democratic Party – to smear and undermine him.

Some of this was legitimate and what naturally happens in an election.But a lot of the opposition to him was breathtaking and unprecedented, and we’ve been learning more as time passes by. The highest levels of the FBI secretly spied on his campaign, and they did it by misleading the FISA court and using an unverified dossier paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

And the unprecedented opposition continued with a fake Russia collusion narrative and a dubious special counsel investigation to undermine and possibly remove a duly elected president elected by the masses whom the establishment happens not to like. If they are successful, we don’t have a constitutional republic anymore, folks. It’s that simple.

I was a long-time Democrat who “walked away” from the party because I couldn’t stomach the Democrats’ anti-democratic antics.Post-2017, it is like the mask has been ripped off. It has become apparent that the Democratic Party and its media supporters seem to have a problem with representative democracy and how it works.They lost an election they thought they’d handily win, and their reaction to it has been to have a long, screeching public tantrum.

Bill Maher and other liberal commentators have openly talked about the urgent necessity to “remove” Trump.Remove Trump? Are they serious? I thought the way it works if you lose an election is you try to present a better argument before the electorate the next time and win the next election, and not simply try to get rid of the election-winner.

In the last eighteen months, the left, the so-called deep state and their media enablers have tried their damnedest to get rid of Trump even if it meant trampling over the rule of law and the Constitution. That is why those who used to care deeply about civil liberties have been mum when the civil liberties of Trump, Carter Page and others have been violated.

That is why one of the only principled liberal, Prof. Alan Dershowitz, who has been arguing about and defending the civil liberties of the Trump team, has been getting grief and facing ostracism from the left. That is why the mainstream media has not only derelicted its investigative duties, but has been shamelessly spinning one of the biggest stories of our time — how the FBI abused its power to spy on an American political campaign.

The striking thing is, the side that has been accusing Trump of subverting democracy has been guilty of it themselves. In America, even a serial killer has rights and deserves due process.But in the eyes of the left, Trump deserves neither.

But the public isn’t dumb.Those of us who aren’t hardcore Democrats recognize what’s going on and have come to see something that seems counter-intuitive:This loud, brash president is actually a victim and an underdog in American politics today, and he hasn’t been getting a fair shake since he won the election, or been given a proper chance to lead the country.

And so we feel sorry for him, and angry and repulsed by his opposition."

http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/03/spygate-turning-democrats-like-party/
 
If all conjecture and zero actual evidence of Trump colluding with the Russians is worse than Watergate, then what is actual evidence of a Democrat Senator's staffer colluding with China?

Political espionage happens here, too. China, for example, is certainly out to steal U.S. technology secrets, noted former intelligence officials, but it also is heavily invested in traditional political intelligence gathering, influence and perception-management operations in California. Former intelligence officials told me that Chinese intelligence once recruited a staff member at a California office of U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, and the source reported back to China about local politics.

At the Aspen Security Forum last week, FBI director Chris Wray acknowledged the threat Chinese spying in particular poses, saying, “China from a counterintelligence perspective represents the broadest, most pervasive, most threatening challenge we face as a country.”

 
"The commentary from Bernstein, a staunch critic of Trump throughout his candidacy and presidency,"

""I think it’s time to recognize that what we are watching in the Trump presidency is worse than Watergate," Bernstein told CNN's Wolf Blitzer."

Yawn.

Lol. If this is Watergate then what the hell do you call what the Obama admin okayed and did?

The left is sick pieces of garbage. They just have a giant platform through media to push their bullshit. No way should conservatives or Republicans let these people continue their craziness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
The left is sick pieces of garbage. They just have a giant platform through media to push their bullshit. No way should conservatives or Republicans let these people continue their craziness.
Nor should anyone of reason, including the remaining Dems of reason. The Left wants a dictatorship of socialism while most are not understanding of the consequences of what they advocate. There is no independent thinking, just a whirlwind of being part of sameness. Really, how can everyone wear pink knit hats with two tits - or lips, who knows - sticking up actually be thinkers? Those folks are scary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingOfBBN
And the investigation started a year ago. When Comey got fired for having the FBI investigate it, Rosenstein did what any AG should do. He hired a Special Council and let him do his job. Sorry it makes your boy look bad.

911 happened under Bush's watch as well. When it can't be prevented, it's what you do about it that matters.

What? Comey didn’t get fired for having the FBI investigate anything. Comey was fired because he was playing politics as the FBI director. Somehow anything that made Trump look bad was being leaked, except the fact he wasn’t actually being investigated for Russian collusion? That Comey, along with Clapper and Brennan purposefully created the scapegoat necessary for the media to report on the dossier, and then leaked that Trump had been briefed on it?
It doesn’t make “ my boy” look bad, it makes the corruption of the govt look bad, as well as those that turn a blind eye to it.

What had Trump done to Russia that Obama wouldn’t? Let’s see, NATO bulked up spending, tougher sanctions, lethal weapons are now sold to Ukraine. Are you really saying nothing could’ve been done to prevent Russia from “attacking” us? You’re right, because we weren’t attacked, and you know I’m right because if Clinton had won none of this would’ve been mentioned, that’s how we know it’s all bullshit.

You’re better than this James, I know you’re smart enough to see what’s going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sefus12
You mean a commission that wasn’t allowed to complete its task, didn’t come up with a conclusion. I’ll be damned.

You guys believe Russians swayed the election, and believe their is no voter fraud?

Great point. The scumbag group who wants to investigate some BS “Russian collusion” also doesn’t want anyone looking at the voter rolls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sefus12
I lot fewer than those who brought them here. Why?


This woman is from the Democratic Republic of the Congo

and we're supposed to believe she came here and just FELT the FASCISM


The F'ing Congo. -- SUCKS

and - just for the record - her home country has RULES about becoming a voting citizen - this is from the CIA Factbook:

Dem Repub Congo Citizenship Facts:

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cg.html

citizenship by birth: no
citizenship by descent only: at least one parent must be a citizen of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
dual citizenship recognized: no
residency requirement for naturalization: 5 years

more details on what she left behind for our Fascist nation:

Despite a wealth of fertile soil, hydroelectric power potential, and mineral resources, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) struggles with many socioeconomic problems, including high infant and maternal mortality rates, malnutrition, poor vaccination coverage, lack of access to improved water sources and sanitation, and frequent and early fertility. Ongoing conflict, mismanagement of resources,


and ....oh yeah......EBOLA......Congo has a new Ebola outbreak
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/new-ebola-outbreak-in-democratic-republic-of-congo--64603

can't think of any good reason why she might actually have it better here - JUST by stepping foot onto US Soil

Am I supposed to believe that she left the CONGO - and wound up here - in a WORSE PREDICAMENT?

maybe she should just be glad she can get CLEAN WATER??


and here's the POS 'resistance' group she's affiliated with -- read their mission statement

the whole purpose of this group's existence -- is to overthrow this Presidential Admin AND Abolish ICE.....in no particular order.........

https://www.riseandresist.org/about/

F - THEM
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT