Are you just going to forget about what their lies caused? About what their bureaucracy caused to emerge from Wuhan?
Biden wasn't even on the East coast when some of these were 'signed'. LOL. Dore sure does find for the democrats on every single legal issue... just following the law and the facts as usual.Wait...you think Biden was aware of ANYTHING in the last week of his "presidency?" Even the major news networks have conceded this. Are you the last diehard believer that Biden was in possession of his faculties? Did we just find the final retard?
Spot on. I had to switch doctors because after the "vax" came out he said he would no longer see anyone that wasn't "vaxxed" because he was "high risk". He was probably in his mid 60's. Tried to tell me I was reading all the wrong stuff about it. But to your point. How was I a risk to him if he was "vaxxed" ?Covid, and Covid related "stuff" was, and continues to be, the stupidest sh*t I've ever witnessed in my life.
Dumbphuks with masks on in their cars even though they were ALONE.
Wrecking what was, at the time, one of the most prosperous economies in post war America.
Making public education, which was already the dregs, even WORSE.
People constantly removing their virtue signaling but utterly useless masks so that they could yell at you for not wearing a mask (ironically, people constantly F***ING around with those stupid GD masks exponentially increased hand to face contact, which is just about the quickest way to catch/spread a virus.
And then the ultimate stupidity; making the illogical argument that people that were not vaccinated were selfish and "putting all of US AT RISK!!!" I never was able to get an explanation for that one; IOW if YOU'RE vaxxed/protected, then how am I a danger to you if I am not?
Those two things/states cannot logically both be true.
And all for what amounted to nothing more than, for the VAST majority of people on earth, A F***ING COLD.
Like I said, it was the dumbest sh*t I"ve ever witnessed. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
This is not the flex or argument you think it is, and you're completely missing the point. We currently tax INCOME. Meaning if you go bust your ass to provide goods and services for the economy we tax you pretty significantly. I'd rather REDUCE income tax on labor and make up for it by INCREASING taxes on rents and investments. This would make American labor more attractive (e.g., more jobs and better pay for workers). The investment class would still get theirs, but it wouldn't be so lopsided.
More open threats. It's gonna get bad this summer as the economy improves. They are losing their shit.
I was talking about economic rents, moron.Raise taxes on rents= rents increase
Rents increase= property values increase
Property values increase= fewer people can afford homes
The Pareto distribution, named after the Italian civil engineer, economist, and sociologist Vilfredo Pareto,[2] is a power-law probability distribution that is used in description of social, quality control, scientific, geophysical, actuarial, and many other types of observable phenomena; the principle originally applied to describing the distribution of wealth in a society, fitting the trend that a large portion of wealth is held by a small fraction of the population.[3][4]The top 1% owns 33% of the country's wealth. Top 10% owns like 70% of it. Not exactly healthy.
REPEAT AFTER ME:This is not the flex or argument you think it is, and you're completely missing the point. We currently tax INCOME. Meaning if you go bust your ass to provide goods and services for the economy we tax you pretty significantly. I'd rather REDUCE income tax on labor and make up for it by INCREASING taxes on rents and investments. This would make American labor more attractive (e.g., more jobs and better pay for workers). The investment class would still get theirs, but it wouldn't be so lopsided.
BS.From your article: "The administration has threatened to reduce federal funding for schools on the list, and others, that it views as being noncompliant with federal civil rights laws."
So, are they in violation of federal civil rights laws? Apparently the feds believe so, thus the cuts. Of course the article doesn't say, but in all likelihood we're looking at an institution riddled with DEI hiring practices. Guess we'll see soon enough.
And who decides what is right is how the Nazis justified the killing of 6 million Jews.
Flat 15% tax with some sort of small wealth tax to appease the leftist weirdos... maybe like a luxury tax on houses over $1M and vehicles over $100K or what I think would be nice is tax on art... If Hunter wants to say his paintings are worth $250K a piece then pay taxes on it big boy. LOL.REPEAT AFTER ME:
ALL TAXES ARE DISINCENTIVES.
You don't seem to understand that wealthy people have options (and it doesn't matter whether you tax income or wealth). The wealthy can establish tax residency ANYWHERE... they're not going to pay more when they can easily pay less. Do you want to drive the wealthy and successful folks out of the US?
Case in point: Italy.
The new PM, Meloni, offered tax residency (@ a rate of flat 10%) to the first 150k applicants last year. Over 850k people applied. She's bringing in WEALTH... and SUCCESS.
Compare that to France, Germany, etc. Wealthy successful folks aren't beating down their doors: only folks moving there are pensioners (school teachers, etc) and immigrants.
So again, you wanna penalize and drive out wealth and success?
NO FVCKING WAY.
You're a brain dead simpleton who has been misled by Ben Shapiro types who do not have the best interest in mind for the average American.REPEAT AFTER ME:
ALL TAXES ARE DISINCENTIVES.
You don't seem to understand that wealthy people have options (and it doesn't matter whether you tax income or wealth). The wealthy can establish tax residency ANYWHERE... they're not going to pay more when they can easily pay less. Do you want to drive the wealthy and successful folks out of the US?
Case in point: Italy.
The new PM, Meloni, offered tax residency (@ a rate of flat 10%) to the first 150k applicants last year. Over 850k people applied. She's bringing in WEALTH... and SUCCESS.
Compare that to France, Germany, etc. Wealthy successful folks aren't beating down their doors: only folks moving there are pensioners (school teachers, etc) and immigrants.
So again, you wanna penalize and drive out wealth and success?
NO FVCKING WAY.
He's heard these arguments before. You'll learn - he doesn't understand and refuses to listen.Wow. So much in here that I feel is completely misguided.
1. Taxes - which taxes? Income, sales, employment, SS, Medicare, estate, capital gains, gasoline, etc. - lot of things make up 'taxes'. Corporations and very wealthy people don't pay all these taxes?
2. Taxing wealth instead of income is a disincentive to accumulate wealth, is it not? Would it not behoove someone to spend all their income and accumulate no assets under such a regime (an extreme case, obviously)? Punish individuals for accumulating savings, 401ks, home(s), etc.? Really, THAT'S your solution?
3. Seriously doubt a $50k/yr worker pays 30% of his income in taxes. Total tax burden - maybe. Income tax - no way in hell. If you want to talk TOTAL tax burden, the wealthy pay a whole lot more than the $50k/yr guy.
4. Another thing to consider: these awful multi-millionaires and billionaires can afford, literally, to live anywhere. You think they'll just absorb a 'wealth' tax year after year and not think, 'Hmmm, maybe the Caymans or Australia or Canada or... might be nice to live in and avoid this dumba$$ tax policy'? When Elizabeth Warren floated it in her dismal campaign for Dem party, Bill Gates said, if passed, he'd have to look at where he lived and how the wealth tax would affect him.
5. You say you're getting hit with 20% tax on your wealth every year under your example. But, you're making $1M a year in income. How does the math change if you're making $150k? Drastically. If you make $150k a year, should you be taxed at that same 20%?
6. Why does a dollar saved by a billionaire trigger a tax when a dollar saved by a middle class individual not? If you want 'fair share', why not a flat tax on all income? Why not a consumption tax which, logically, would hit high earners/wealthy harder than middle class?
The whole 'the tax system isn't fair' and 'billionaires don't pay their fair share' is horse hockey and has been disproven about a million times.
Notice how the reporters just keep shouting. Any time they get "owned" they just keep yelling questions. They are nothing but machines, given orders to perform a task. None of them have working brains.
REPEAT AFTER ME:
ALL TAXES ARE DISINCENTIVES.
He's a troll. You're better off ignoring him.Are you being intentionally obtuse or do you actually not understand?
These terms are acceptable. Trump’s mind is not mush and he can sign them.
Except I have watched video of Trump signing his orders. He does it on camera... he's in the WH when they are signed. Joe was in Cali when they said he signed EO's in DC.... How? LOL.These terms are acceptable. Trump’s mind is not mush and he can sign them.
How about your guy?
Have you reached out for help yet?He's a troll. You're better off ignoring him.
Its just a ridiculous distraction anyway.These terms are acceptable. Trump’s mind is not mush and he can sign them.
How about your guy?
Except I have watched video of Trump signing his orders. He does it on camera... he's in the WH when they are signed. Joe was in Cali when they said he signed EO's in DC.... How? LOL.
So, you think we live in a democracy? I think I have found the root of your problem. Ignorance.Where will the US be on the democracy rating after getting his full term to implement changes.
Higher or lower?
Ah, word salad. The interweb equivalent of nonsensical jabbering when trying to evade the truth.Have you reached out for help yet?
That the first step, maybe those around you will give you a second chance once you get treatment.
People with narcissistic personality disorder are extremely resistant to changing their behavior, even when it’s causing them problems. Their tendency is to turn the blame on to others. What’s more, they are extremely sensitive and react badly to even the slightest criticisms, disagreements, or perceived slights, which they view as personal attacks. For the people in the narcissist’s life, it’s often easier just to go along with their demands to avoid the coldness and rages. However, by understanding more about narcissistic personality disorder, you can spot the narcissists in your life, protect yourself from their power plays, and establish healthier boundaries.
Treatment for narcissistic personality disorder
Due to the very nature of the disorder, most people with NPD are reluctant to admit they have a problem—and even more reluctant to seek help. Even when they do, narcissistic personality disorder can be very challenging to treat. But that doesn’t mean there’s no hope or that changes aren’t possible.
Mood stabilizers, antidepressants, and antipsychotic drugs are sometimes prescribed in severe cases or if your NPD co-occurs with another disorder. However, in most cases psychotherapy is the primary form of treatment. This can take place in-person or via online therapy.
Working with a medical provider, such as a skilled therapist, you can learn to accept responsibility for your actions, develop a better sense of proportion, and build healthier relationships.
You can also work on developing your emotional intelligence (EQ). EQ is the ability to understand, use, and manage your emotions in positive ways to empathize with others, communicate effectively, and build strong relationships. Importantly, the skills that make up emotional intelligence can be learned at any time.
how did Trump and republican congress get elected then?So, you think we live in a democracy? I think I have found the root of your problem. Ignorance.
Thank you Joe Biden for the highest production of oil EVER in US History!
It's called the weave.Ah, word salad. The interweb equivalent of nonsensical jabbering when trying to evade the truth.