EV's 287-250 is hardly a landslide. One 19+ EV state flips the outcome. Losing the popular vote is hardly a landslide either.He's a cheerleader that says canned lines over and over.
He couldn't be President after Trump. Need Vance.
EV's 287-250 is hardly a landslide. One 19+ EV state flips the outcome. Losing the popular vote is hardly a landslide either.He's a cheerleader that says canned lines over and over.
He couldn't be President after Trump. Need Vance.
Agree that Vance brings zero that Trump doesn't except greater appeal to the same voters he already has. I do like him & think he has a national future. maybe he can be the next Mitch McConnell. I think Burgum tech & business backgrounds bring a lot - stability & skeptical suburbanites. Youngkin is also stable & beat Dims at their own game. Carson OK.Vance's seat in OH is not a safe seat. BAD idea. We gain NOTHING with Vance as VP. I like the guy but he does not bring in a single black vote or soccer mom who wants a reason to vote for Trump like Scott does. That is a NATIONAL appeal.
Speaking of rent...Rent free. You're obsessed.
So the fix is on.
Couldn't once he said anytime anywhere.Trump should have told CNN to pound sand.
OK, but why should a lower income - $54K is lower income, $74K+ is median - renter expect to afford a medium priced apartment?Speaking of rent...
Good Luck Trying to Rent an Apartment in Biden's Economy.
No one is immune from the impact of Bidenomics. According to a new report, the average renter can't afford a typical U.S. apartment.
According to Redfin, the typical U.S. renter household earns about $54,712 per year, which is 17.3% less than the $66,120 needed to afford the median-priced apartment at $1,653 per month. This means that 61% of renters can't afford their housing without significant financial stress.
The crap you and your freaky little friends shove down our throats.
Thanks, Joe!
Because they can?OK, but why should a lower income - $54K is lower income, $74K+ is median - renter expect to afford a medium priced apartment?
Not when it’s two 80 year olds. VPs will matter in this election because there is a high probability that either becomes president. Trump needs a solid vp pick.Voters vote for the top of the ticket. Tim Scott is a fantastic symbolic choice.
What's the problem..... They're only trying to protect us from misinformation. 🤪😜😛😵
I don't automatically trust Vance or a couple others based on their past comments. Trump needs loyalty and not a mole who will leak. Also, the VP position attends funerals and nothing else. The position is best used as a symbolic pick. If we are truly trying to reach into the Trump appeal to black voters (mostly men) then Sen. Scott fits that bill. He will be harder for the left to attack because we can just call them racists. You will also see....our side will call him the FIRST true AA candidate with his poor upbringing. Not Hawaii privilege and leveraging his whiteness (Barry). A real rags to riches story. POLITICALLY he is the most compelling choice. I don't think we need to waste the VPOTUS spot based on some "competence" level. Scott is fine wrt that as well but the rest of his story is what will attract voters NATIONALLY. There is no swing state that Trump should grab a VP from. NY is not realistic. Mich? Don't see it.Agree that Vance brings zero that Trump doesn't except greater appeal to the same voters he already has. I do like him & think he has a national future. maybe he can be the next Mitch McConnell. I think Burgum tech & business backgrounds bring a lot - stability & skeptical suburbanites. Youngkin is also stable & beat Dims at their own game. Carson OK.
Vance won an open seat 53-47. He'd win bigger the next time. Sherrod only hanging on due to his incumbency. Moreno vs. him for open seat & Moreno wins. Moreno < 50/50 now I think unless Trump concentrates on OH to win big. Now maybe Vance as VP would help Moreno too.
Biden has shown that he is not in charge of anything. The Deep state and the DNC and media pull his strings. So I don't think that we get anything different with Kamala or Gavin or anyone else. "Is it bad enough yet" is the only thing that matters.Not when it’s two 80 year olds. VPs will matter in this election because there is a high probability that either becomes president. Trump needs a solid vp pick.
Yeah. This is a real selling point.Agree that Vance brings zero that Trump doesn't except greater appeal to the same voters he already has. I do like him & think he has a national future. maybe he can be the next Mitch McConnell. I think Burgum tech & business backgrounds bring a lot - stability & skeptical suburbanites. Youngkin is also stable & beat Dims at their own game. Carson OK.
Vance won an open seat 53-47. He'd win bigger the next time. Sherrod only hanging on due to his incumbency. Moreno vs. him for open seat & Moreno wins. Moreno < 50/50 now I think unless Trump concentrates on OH to win big. Now maybe Vance as VP would help Moreno too.
I don’t believe it for a second. Biden and his 50 years in government is the head of the deep state. Just because lately he’s gone downhill doesn’t override his history.Biden has shown that he is not in charge of anything. The Deep state and the DNC and media pull his strings. So I don't think that we get anything different with Kamala or Gavin or anyone else. "Is it bad enough yet" is the only thing that matters.
As for Trump. He is not someone that I worry about with his health. He is muuuuuuch better physically than Biden so the VP choice is less important and more "symbolic." No fence sitter is going to vote for Trump because of any VP's political views or gravitas. Totally symbolic and a black GOP-VPOTUS sends a really strong message. We are going to fight for the black vote.
Oh he was right in the thick of it at one time. I’m sure he has enough ammo to blackmail all of DC. That’s why he is where he is. He wanted the legacy and they said fine, but you’re not running anything. It’s all Barry and his Marxist cronies.I don’t believe it for a second. Biden and his 50 years in government is the head of the deep state. Just because lately he’s gone downhill doesn’t override his history.
He was told that they would push his ass across the finish line in 2020 but he needed to be totally subservient to the radical left of his party....just look at the Obama staff that actually pulls the strings. Ron Klain, Anita Dunn, Samantha Power and others. They have all the power over Biden and make the decisions. Nothing in Biden's past in the Senate indicated he would be as radically leftist as he is. He is just a placeholder...willingly.I don’t believe it for a second. Biden and his 50 years in government is the head of the deep state. Just because lately he’s gone downhill doesn’t override his history.
Trump should refuse to go on stage until CNN allow the press in the room and no delay..Keep on believing that 2020 wasn’t rigged, folks. This is unprecedented in our history.
Why Trump agreed to this whole shitshow is beyond me. There isn’t a lib on here that can legitimately justify any of these obviously one sided tactics are fair and balanced to both parties.
They gon assassinate Trump on live TV and the two minute delay is to edit out who did it.
Generally agree but it does happen. Worked with a guy back in 1992 who was a conservative and voted Repub his entire life. Was all for voting for Bush Sr. again....voted for him in '88. My buddy was from Tennessee. Clinton named Gore as his VP. My buddy turned on a dime and became a Clinton supporter and voter. Sad that someone would be that shallow. But he was a good guy.No fence sitter is going to vote for Trump because of any VP's political views or gravitas. Totally symbolic and a black GOP-VPOTUS sends a really strong message.
Same here.Not watching. I already know the outcome.
Let’s see how many Biden lies get fact checked.What's the problem..... They're only trying to protect us from misinformation. 🤪😜😛😵
Watching Jesse Waters on FNC last night; he mentioned that the NYT was going to have 29 (!) fact-checkers working in real time.......
This debate is going to be the proverbial sh!t show.
Why Scott over Ben Carson if that’s the road you’re taking? I’d Trust Carson to have Trumps back more than Scott.I don't automatically trust Vance or a couple others based on their past comments. Trump needs loyalty and not a mole who will leak. Also, the VP position attends funerals and nothing else. The position is best used as a symbolic pick. If we are truly trying to reach into the Trump appeal to black voters (mostly men) then Sen. Scott fits that bill. He will be harder for the left to attack because we can just call them racists. You will also see....our side will call him the FIRST true AA candidate with his poor upbringing. Not Hawaii privilege and leveraging his whiteness (Barry). A real rags to riches story. POLITICALLY he is the most compelling choice. I don't think we need to waste the VPOTUS spot based on some "competence" level. Scott is fine wrt that as well but the rest of his story is what will attract voters NATIONALLY. There is no swing state that Trump should grab a VP from. NY is not realistic. Mich? Don't see it.
Approval rating will sadly increase.
I don’t worry about Trump dying of natural causes, more along the unnatural cause line.Biden has shown that he is not in charge of anything. The Deep state and the DNC and media pull his strings. So I don't think that we get anything different with Kamala or Gavin or anyone else. "Is it bad enough yet" is the only thing that matters.
As for Trump. He is not someone that I worry about with his health. He is muuuuuuch better physically than Biden so the VP choice is less important and more "symbolic." No fence sitter is going to vote for Trump because of any VP's political views or gravitas. Totally symbolic and a black GOP-VPOTUS sends a really strong message. We are going to fight for the black vote.
I like Carson too. Also Byron Donald's. I just think Sen. Scott is a higher level.Why Scott over Ben Carson if that’s the road you’re taking? I’d Trust Carson to have Trumps back more than Scott.