LOL
The problem with Dems is that the GOP is almost always right. Dems wanted slavery and fought hard for Jim Crow. History doesn’t lie.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
The problem with Dems is that the GOP is almost always right. Dems wanted slavery and fought hard for Jim Crow. History doesn’t lie.
I hope this prediction has 100% accuracy.
As we progress toward Nov '24... RD just looks better and better.
🥸 New gpt4 AI stumped. 🤣
arstechnica.com
OpenAI checked to see whether GPT-4 could take over the world
"ARC's evaluation has much lower probability of leading to an AI takeover than the deployment itself."
Further U.S. involvement in Ukraine is not vital national interest, says DeSantis
Becoming "further entangled in a territorial dispute between Ukraine and Russia" is not a vital U.S. national interest, said Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who is eying running for president, in comments released on Monday.
www.reuters.com
😡
Vermont School Barred From Sports Matches After Refusing Game With Trans Athlete
Mid Vermont Christian School was banned from tournaments with the Vermont Principals’ Association after forfeiting a girls basketball playoff game last month.
Come back or get sued.
www.cnbc.com
In client call, SVB's new CEO urges clients to bring funds back to the bank
Silicon Valley Bank's new CEO Tim Mayopoulos pitched venture and startup clients hard to help keep the bank alive in a 30-minute call.
The Washington Times Conservative writer Byron York provides a more nuanced take on DeSantis' Ukraine remarks:Further U.S. involvement in Ukraine is not vital national interest, says DeSantis
Becoming "further entangled in a territorial dispute between Ukraine and Russia" is not a vital U.S. national interest, said Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who is eying running for president, in comments released on Monday.
"What to make of DeSantis's answers? Has he taken Putin's side against America? Has he moved to the extremes, the crazy fringes, of the Ukraine debate? No, he hasn't. There is a range of opinion on what the U.S. should do in the Ukraine matter, and DeSantis occupies an entirely legitimate position, no matter what his more excitable critics might say."
Ron DeSantis, in the mainstream on Ukraine - Washington Examiner
RON DESANTIS, IN THE MAINSTREAM ON UKRAINE. Recently, Fox News's Tucker Carlson asked all the Republican presidential candidates and possible candidates to answer a series of questions on U.S. policy concerning the war in Ukraine. There were six: 1) Is opposing Russia in Ukraine a vital American...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
Barney Frank Pushed to Ease Financial Regulations After Joining Signature Bank Board
The former congressman and co-sponsor of the Dodd-Frank bill says there is no evidence that the change enabled bank’s failure.www.wsj.com
Barney says it didn't have any effect.
I'm gonna go with the expert class and not some rando alt mod.
🤣🤣🤣
Trump shouldn't have listened to the two faced turd or the greedy banks. They are all in bed together fighting over access to our hard earned $$$.
The Washington Times Conservative writer Byron York provides a more nuanced take on DeSantis' Ukraine remarks:
"What to make of DeSantis's answers? Has he taken Putin's side against America? Has he moved to the extremes, the crazy fringes, of the Ukraine debate? No, he hasn't. There is a range of opinion on what the U.S. should do in the Ukraine matter, and DeSantis occupies an entirely legitimate position, no matter what his more excitable critics might say."
Ron DeSantis, in the mainstream on Ukraine - Washington Examiner
RON DESANTIS, IN THE MAINSTREAM ON UKRAINE. Recently, Fox News's Tucker Carlson asked all the Republican presidential candidates and possible candidates to answer a series of questions on U.S. policy concerning the war in Ukraine. There were six: 1) Is opposing Russia in Ukraine a vital American...
"a President DeSantis would want Ukraine to make some territorial concessions."
Yeppers. War over.
Are you down with that vh? vh is gonna be a putin stooge.
DeSantis is smarter than his BS statement on Ukraine indicates. He's only saying what he knows the looney tunes Tucker Carlson/MTG Republican base wants to hear.The Washington Times Conservative writer Byron York provides a more nuanced take on DeSantis' Ukraine remarks:
"What to make of DeSantis's answers? Has he taken Putin's side against America? Has he moved to the extremes, the crazy fringes, of the Ukraine debate? No, he hasn't. There is a range of opinion on what the U.S. should do in the Ukraine matter, and DeSantis occupies an entirely legitimate position, no matter what his more excitable critics might say."
Ron DeSantis, in the mainstream on Ukraine - Washington Examiner
RON DESANTIS, IN THE MAINSTREAM ON UKRAINE. Recently, Fox News's Tucker Carlson asked all the Republican presidential candidates and possible candidates to answer a series of questions on U.S. policy concerning the war in Ukraine. There were six: 1) Is opposing Russia in Ukraine a vital American...
If elected, he will continue doing exactly what Biden is doing because that is what the top military brass knows is best for our long term security.
There is nothing more dangerous for our country's security than an emboldened Russia and China. Ukraine is a relatively cheap proxy war for the US to slowly bleed Russia dry of it's military assets and personnel. It is also a lesson to China about future military ventures.
Listen to the Republicans in the Senate and most in the House if you don't believe me.
As a anti-trumpster I am curious on the (far) rights take on Trump trying to knock down DeSantis? I know on the left the worry was Trump would support DeSantis (big worry was joining his ticket as DeSantis VP).
Seems like (far) right has no real interest in winning in 2024 out of spite against the RINOs or swamp or whatever.
Strange to me not wanting to win to help further one’s beliefs?
-And hope I’m not sounding hateful or anything, in long run I think healthy debate and civil “discourse” is good.
Seems like (far) right has no real interest in winning in 2024 out of spite against the RINOs or swamp or whatever.
Strange to me not wanting to win to help further one’s beliefs?
-And hope I’m not sounding hateful or anything, in long run I think healthy debate and civil “discourse” is good.
Per CDC....
"During all periods, average weekly age-standardized incidence and mortality were consistently higher among unvaccinated persons (ranges = 216.1–1,256.0 and 1.6–15.8, respectively) than among monovalent-only vaccine recipients (ranges = 86.4–487.7 and 0.3–1.4, respectively); average weekly incidence and mortality during ...Feb 10, 2023"
United States: COVID-19 weekly death rate by vaccination status
Death rates are calculated as the number of deaths in each group, divided by the total number of people in this group. This is given per 100,000 people.
ourworldindata.org
If you ever want a laugh, listen to the mental gymnastics Democrats use when they try to navigate through history while never accepting any blame. Somehow Lincoln was one of theirs but also FDR and then they switched again in the 60s. They just conveniently navigate through history where they are not at fault for anything but were the 'real' good guys.
It doesn't matter how many holes you poke in their theory nor is there a number of facts that would ever make them understand how wrong they are.
The people that don't want war and opposed to sending an endless supply of money and material to Ukraine are considered " far right"?
The "far right" don't want Trump, and Desantis is playing a part right now that will change if he's the nominee. Do you think the elites and establishment will support Trump if he's the nominee?
Oh so now you ready to go after China too?
Sam, you take any prescription medication? Serious question.
You do know 90 percent of this country’s pharmaceuticals/vitamins/etc come from China, right? Along with so many other things we are totally dependent on…may want to put down your war drum and rethink that one.
Best thing we could do is pack up and come home and not send another damn penny over into Europe. Only thing getting bled dry is us. RD won’t do anything close to what Biden is doing to us right now.
I know Joe Biden can’t do this and I don’t think he could before his dementia. I don’t believe I’ve heard any POTUS talk this way since maybe Bush Sr.
Are you down with that? Provide your position before throwing out random questions.
LOL The "far right" was stuff that Bill Clinton was saying in the 90s.
There's really nothing extreme about
- Wanting less government
- Fewer taxes
- Protecting our border
- National interest over globalism
- Not wanting our resources going to Ukraine
- Not being forced to participate in someone else's delusion
- Not to be disarmed by a tyrannical government
- Not afraid to fight the propagandist media
- Not wanting our cities to be filled with crime and with prosecutors that won't prosecute them
What exactly is extreme about this? lol
And voting for RINOs is no different than voting for the Democrat Party. It's controlled opposition. It's also why the 2008 and 2012 elections were Obama wins---Democrat vs Dem Lite with McCain/Romney.
Evidently these morons owned a bunch of Treasuries, and didn't follow proper accounting procedures (specifically, they didn't "mark to market" on their losing positions), AND the dumbazz regulators didn't discover this until it was too late.Come back or get sued.
In client call, SVB's new CEO urges clients to bring funds back to the bank
Silicon Valley Bank's new CEO Tim Mayopoulos pitched venture and startup clients hard to help keep the bank alive in a 30-minute call.
The talk of "more regulation" is bullshite... since the ones that were in place weren't followed by either the bank or the Feds... but don't let stop you libs from blaming Trump lol.
Typical Trump IMO. Has some street smarts but acts like a middle schooler too much for my tastes. Plus, it's hard to measure the size of his ego and thirst for absolute power. Don't like him, I just want a reasonable, diplomatic conservative candidate.
I have said this before, but classic liberalism no longer runs the Dem Party.
Don’t be so sure. DeSantis is a straightlaced MAGA, not a moderate Republican who knows how to lie to the base. It’s more likely he’s softening his tone with the interviewer and is being intentionally vague than it is he’d continue supporting Ukraine. Remember he was in the military himself and had issues with the brass. He wants to fry them, not listen to their advice.
Oh. Is it. Dropped from the 1% reported this morning on the news? That was fast. Woke spin.
All banks pay FDIC to insure their deposits. That’s who pays. In the macro sense does it raise costs? Sure, just like every automobile accident raises costs, every time someone goes to a doctor, it raises costs…everything anybody does that results in an insurance company paying a claim…hell just filing a claim raises costs. But it’s a cost baked into the system. FDIC requires all banks pay a percentage of their total deposits to fund the reserves from which depositors are made whole in case of a bank failure.
How much costs had your boy Trump cost us all through all of his bankruptcies? Those also raise costs for us all as banks who had loaned him money didn’t get paid. Contractors who did work for him didn’t get paid and therefore adds costs. Where is your outrage?
Dixiecrats and Blue dogs were never liberal. That’s why they are all Republicans today.
Keep telling yourself the lie as if you are the only anti-racist in the room. We all enjoy the laugh. Because, what would we do if you looked sane?
Thank God you and MTG aren't in charge of our nation's security.
How many of you idiots think Lincoln was a conservative?
Nobody ever called Strom Thurman or George Wallace, liberals. Nobody ever called Jay or any of the Rockefellers conservative.
Barry Goldwater was a conservatives conservative yet when he ran for president in 1964 the only GOP leaning state he won was AZ…the other states he won were LA, MS, AL, SC and GA…all at the time controlled exclusively by “Democrats”….or more accurately, Dixiecrats.
Lincoln used the federal government to win the Civil War and preserve the union, while ending slavery. Not sure what choice he had. As often happens in times of crisis or war, the size of the Federal Government has increased, for better or worse. Mostly worse of late and going forward. That said, I believe Lincoln to be a humble, moral man of character while in office.
Obviously what we call 'right' and 'left' or 'conservative' and 'liberal' are arbitrary distinctions really only meaningful in the context of their opposite. Does everyone here even know where the terms right and left even came from originally?(hint: the French Revolution) The point being that there are different spheres one can be 'right' or 'left' in. Traditionally the right economically has been associated with fewer government services supported by minimal taxes and the left with more government services supported by higher taxes. Socially the left supports more freedoms and nontraditional behaviors while the right favors strict enforcement of societal norms. People vote depending on which sphere is more important to them, economic or social, which led to significant chunks of the coalitions being fiscally conservative but socially liberal members of the 'conservative' party and socially conservative but fiscally liberal members of the 'liberal' party. These days the two parties are much closer together economically, with the Dems not really having the chutzpah to do anything transformative and the Republicans moving more towards deficit spending in the last few decades. Which leads to the modern realignment we're seeing where no one has a clear choice on economic policy so everyone makes their R or D choice based on social beliefs. This has solidified the two coalitions into a socially liberal and a socially conservative party which wasn't the case throughout the rest of our history these ignorant fools love to cite. That's the long way of stating the fact that social conservatives were the ones supporting slavery and Jim Crow, regardless of what party they belonged to. If they lived today they would be MAGA Republicans without a doubt. That is fact.
Who provides that number?
