ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .

Biden Admin Is Placing Undercover Federal Agents At Universities. Here’s Why


  • The Enforcement Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA) will use undercover officials to monitor colleges and universities for misleading or predatory practices, the Department of Education announced on Tuesday.
  • The officials will identify any “misrepresentations” in several factors advertised to students including “transferability of credits, job placement rates, completion and withdrawal rates, graduates’ future earning potential, career services, the cost of attendance, the amount of federal student aid, and accreditation status.”

  • “We support reasonable practices that hold all institutions accountable for misrepresentations that financially harm students and taxpayers; however, the federal government has a track record of using secret shopper investigations to malign politically unfavored institutions with distorted findings that later result in the need for public correction,” Nicholas Kent, Career Education Colleges and Universities chief policy officer, wrote in response to Tuesday’s announcement.
The Biden administration will disguise agents as students to catch colleges and universities that are misleading students, according to the announcement, the Department of Education (DOE) announced on Tuesday.

The Enforcement Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA) will use “secret shoppers” to ensure that higher education institutions are complying with federal laws regarding financial aid, recruitment and enrollment and that they are not misleading or preying on students, the announcement reads. The agents, posed as students at the institutions, will identify any “misrepresentations” in several aspects that colleges and universities advertise to recruit and retain students including “transferability of credits, job placement rates, completion and withdrawal rates, graduates’ future earning potential, career services, the cost of attendance, the amount of federal student aid, and accreditation status.”
Also guys, the government will use undercover agents to pretend to be college students but totally wouldn’t pretend to be their political opposition at a protest. 👌
 
There is a divide and he gets to decide who the haters are. He and D-Sus. Their hate is the self proclaimed righteous and not counted against them, by them.
Biden told you who was truly sinful.

If we had only let his ministry of truth exist and do their jobs, we could finally be united.

We will only become more divided if you don’t do as I say. Our democracy depends upon it.

The beatings will continue until the morale improves.
 
Sorry that I'm going to post a bunch here in a bit, but, I couldn't let this go by. He talked to ONE person who...and then he goes on to tell us we ALL must change because of this ONE circumstance. Kamala may very well have been tabula rasa before she met this mental midget. Her entire intellect has seemingly come from this ONE dude. How much exactly did Kamala or ANY of her ancestors contribute to building this country? Same as a hammer, plow, or any other contrivance that made life easier for those who could afford it. If white people are so evil, why the white guy husband? Political optics? Maybe she has a constricted throat. Who knows?
 
So what did the J6 committee do other than show video of things that happened? Do you deny that anything we saw didn’t happen?

Let’s try this take. Do you recall “The Malice at the Palace“? I could easily produce hours of video that showed a NBA basketball game being played just like 1000s before or since. But it was the 10-15 minutes where a player goes into the stands and fights with a fan that separated that game from others. Would it be truthful to argue that it was just a game like any other?

Tucker has been caught red handed in his lies. His text messages say one thing, his on air comments, another. So you think he’s lying privately but not publicly?
Yeah, it’s about comprehension and critical thinking and you’re failing at both.
Just about every Mainstream Media Pundit you listen to has been caught red handed in their lies. Russian Collusion, vaccine efficacy, Hunter Biden’s Laptop.

How about you tell us the specific lies that Tucker told when revealing the video evidence. What about those videos was false?
 
This may literally be one of the most idiotic statements I have seen posted here, ever. Yeah, Fuzz,  some of the riots and rioters targeted property. I'll even say  most did. In fact, most of the J6 AND BLM riots were "mostly peaceful". Ask David Dorn about how ONLY property was a victim...well, unfortunately, you can't ask him that.
750 injured cops throughout the riots begs to differ.
 
Real, honest question: a friend of mine and I were talking last week about various things and she brought up Tucker Carlson and the videos and basically dismissed it as Carlson spreading a bunch of lies. Rather that get into a long, ultimately frustrating discussion about videos I've never seen (don't watch Fox or any news show), I'd like to know what the party line is re: Carlson and J6 videos and why some people think they're a fraud and doctored. Is it only political grandstanding or are there legitimate reasons to question whether Carlson is only showing bits and pieces of video that uphold his opinion while other bits that completely contradict his opinion are being left out, i.e., censoring the 'facts'?

It certainly appears to me that the narrative thus far has been that it was a violent, armed uprising with multiple individuals harmed and extensive property damage occurred. The few blips of the Carlson videos that I've watched calls that narrative into question. Multiple police officers were killed at the scene, I believe, has been completely discredited. Armed insurrectionists has also been discredited to my knowledge as no perpetrator has been charged with unlawfully carrying a firearm.

So, without political commentary, what, exactly, are the facts and how are we as citizens supposed to know which side of the current narrative to believe (or if the truth, as so often happens, lies in the middle)?
Well, there was one person with a firearm. The Antifa dude who was dressed as a MAGA supporter and paid $70K by CNN to film it all.
 
Just about every Mainstream Media Pundit you listen to has been caught red handed in their lies. Russian Collusion, vaccine efficacy, Hunter Biden’s Laptop.

How about you tell us the specific lies that Tucker told when revealing the video evidence. What about those videos was false?
No no no. Fuzz told us that the MSM may get things wrong but they don’t intentionally lie like Fox. And Fuzz calls it like he sees it.
 
No no no. Fuzz told us that the MSM may get things wrong but they don’t intentionally lie like Fox. And Fuzz calls it like he sees it.
Yeah, they don’t intentionally lie. 😂 They just coordinate TV coverage with political camps and let them edit articles for approval (DNC leaks).

It’s just a coincidence that so many of them are on Soros boards and they have the exact same view, the exact same phrasing, and covering the exact same thing all at the same time. 😂
 
You’re right it was a legal shoot. That still doesn’t make it the right thing to do. She was a hog gone wild, breaking windows and climbing through them. But she wasn’t an imminent threat to someone’s life. Police brutality and excessive force must be consistently condemned and reformed, regardless of how one feels about the victim. I mean they see every black person as worse than Ashli inherently.
I’d disagree that it wasn’t the right thing to do. Perhaps the officer could have exposed himself and if the intruder then continued forward, then shoot but we know if she had been successful in entering; a) others are right behind her, b) it could have easily become a blood bath and c) the welfare of the people in the chamber would have been in peril.
There was no way they could allow the mob to get access to the legislators.
 
The FDIC will pass the fees on to community banks, those fees will be eventually passed on to the depositor - YOU THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER.
The money that taxpayers paid in has already been used to bail the banks out. Now they must collect "fees" from those same taxpayers to get that money back so it can go to the Ukraine for laundering.
 
Just about every Mainstream Media Pundit you listen to has been caught red handed in their lies. Russian Collusion, vaccine efficacy, Hunter Biden’s Laptop.

How about you tell us the specific lies that Tucker told when revealing the video evidence. What about those videos was false?
On each of those issues the “Mainstream Media Pundits” reported the findings of Muller who said Russia definitely interfered, he couldn’t prove collusion but did not rule it out. Vaccine efficacy was the findings of the research, not their (MSM) opinions. Personally part of my job is collecting medical data from which our actuaries determine how our medical insurance policies we sell pay claims. FYI, outcomes for vaccinated patients was and is considerably better than unvaccinated.
Hunter’s laptop is in the same place as Trump’s healthcare plan. In other words, figments of your imagination.

As for Tucker and his video evidence…his “evidence” is akin to having the Ring doorbell video from someone’s home. 99.9% of the time there is nothing to see. It’s easy to pick through and put together a story that paints a rosy picture. Problem is, 1 million hours of peaceful video don’t cancel the hours of what we all witnessed with our own eyes.

Lastly, the difference between lying and being wrong is knowing what you’re saying is untrue. We have dozens of text messages between Tucker and others at Fox that prove they knew what they were saying publicly was wrong.
 
Bet it would if it had been a white cop shooting and killing a black Ashley Babbit. 1-6 was child's play compared to blm and their partnered anarchist antifa. Hopefully, one of your anarchist children gets killed in the same fashion. She was at least a patroit
Patriots don’t attack their own government. Nice straw man arguments by the way.
 
Always an imaginary boogeymen with you guys. Ray Eps (whoever that is), Hunter Biden, trans kids, gay people, CRT, "groomers" etc.
Always an imaginary enemy out there plotting to take away your guns, kids, wives and churches.
And yet you are perfectly ok with actual threats to our real democracy when Trump incites a mob to attack our U. S. Capitol to stop the Presidential election process. Yes...that really happened.
But trans!
You're fine with actual children being mowed down in schools and malls by guns designed to kill men in wars. Yes....guns are really the leading cause of death in children now in America.
But drag shows.
You're perfectly fine with a Commie dictator invading a country in Europe and initiating a land war for the first time since WW2. Yes...Putin is bombing maternity hospitals and apartment buildings filled with innocent civilians.
But CRT.
You hang on Tucker Carlson's every word and slurp up his stupid videos even though court records show he didn't believe the election lies, he hates Trump and thinks he is a threat to America. Yes...Tucker gets paid well to sell lies to idiots and he knows it.
But Hunter Biden.
Not really surprising that the same folks who believe there were T-Rexs and Wooly Mammoths on an Ark for 40 days would also believe in whatever Faux News tells them to believe. 😂😂😂
I see you're off your meds again ...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sambowieshin
On each of those issues the “Mainstream Media Pundits” reported the findings of Muller who said Russia definitely interfered, he couldn’t prove collusion but did not rule it out. Vaccine efficacy was the findings of the research, not their (MSM) opinions. Personally part of my job is collecting medical data from which our actuaries determine how our medical insurance policies we sell pay claims. FYI, outcomes for vaccinated patients was and is considerably better than unvaccinated.
Hunter’s laptop is in the same place as Trump’s healthcare plan. In other words, figments of your imagination.

As for Tucker and his video evidence…his “evidence” is akin to having the Ring doorbell video from someone’s home. 99.9% of the time there is nothing to see. It’s easy to pick through and put together a story that paints a rosy picture. Problem is, 1 million hours of peaceful video don’t cancel the hours of what we all witnessed with our own eyes.

Lastly, the difference between lying and being wrong is knowing what you’re saying is untrue. We have dozens of text messages between Tucker and others at Fox that prove they knew what they were saying publicly was wrong.
Tucker’s next video project will be to cherry pick through thousands of hours of WW2 video footage to put together a montage showing the Nazi’s generosity in offering the Jewish people an all expense paid scenic holiday by train to a sprawling resort in the Polish countryside.
 
The FDIC will pass the fees on to community banks, those fees will be eventually passed on to the depositor - YOU THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER.
Who says??? Banks pay into FDIC not taxpayers. If you don't wanna pay BS regional bank fees, find another bank. That's on you.... the consumer.
 
How the hell does anyone not think black slaves built large portions of this country?
large is a relative term. Does a bricklayer have a job that an architect didn't design? Who decided where the train tracks were laid? Who wrote the greatest document ever created by a government?
The difference between the BLM riots and J6 is BLM riots/rioters targeted property, not people.
Stupid, even for you.
Real, honest question: a friend of mine and I were talking last week about various things and she brought up Tucker Carlson and the videos and basically dismissed it as Carlson spreading a bunch of lies. Rather that get into a long, ultimately frustrating discussion about videos I've never seen (don't watch Fox or any news show), I'd like to know what the party line is re: Carlson and J6 videos and why some people think they're a fraud and doctored. Is it only political grandstanding or are there legitimate reasons to question whether Carlson is only showing bits and pieces of video that uphold his opinion while other bits that completely contradict his opinion are being left out, i.e., censoring the 'facts'?
The J6 Kangaroo Committee showed only the parts of the video that furthered their narrative. They neglected to show any evidence at all that went against the preconceived outcome. FBI has been busted for suppressing exculpatory evidence. Are you shitting me? Is this the kind of country you want to live in?
The proud Boys were the first ones at the Capitol, about 300. This was prior to Trump finishing his speech. At least that’s what the media has told us.

Now they are about to have the charges dropped because the FBI deleted evidence…
Did you not see the video of antifa donning their Trump costumes?
The only thing you said here is that since Gore challenged election errors it “inspired” Trump to try remain in office after losing the election? That’s a pretty flimsy premise. Especially since they both played out in entirely different ways, Gore literally had the position to do what Trump tried to and of course accepted the results of the process and didn’t do it. Trump meanwhile publicly sowed doubt in the process from before he was even elected, then used every opportunity he had to try to overturn the election and remain in power, up to and including siccing an angry mod on the Capitol and Congress themselves. The South sent fake electors in 1876 just like Trump, but Gore is his inspiration? Puhlease.
Trump's case, just like Gore's, would have gone to the SC. Couldn't risk that. There were voting irregularities that are readily apparent to anyone who doesn't support those who support NAMBLA and the normalization of mutilating children in order to make a few mentally distressed individuals feel better about their malady.
I know it's not the right thing to do, but that man needs his ass kicked.
Math lesson.
needs = wants
kicked = dicked
Everything you defend would be grooming if it were done by any adult in nearly any context.

Again, your party has maneuvered you into the disgraceful position of defending grown men who groom children.
He has to be into it. He should take one for the Gipper and bite the bullet.
What member of the Political Forum is this?

FrRiqteXwAcCgoe
Not any individual, just a representation.
The FDIC will pass the fees on to community banks, those fees will be eventually passed on to the depositor - YOU THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER.
All this is neccessary to install the global monetary system. The Biden puppeteers have set in motion all the elements needed to turn your green dollars into purple dollars worth 10%, overnight. So to speak.
Just about every Mainstream Media Pundit you listen to has been caught red handed in their lies. Russian Collusion, vaccine efficacy, Hunter Biden’s Laptop.

How about you tell us the specific lies that Tucker told when revealing the video evidence. What about those videos was false?
The narrative. The narrative is false. Not the information. It's a video and all can see it at the same time. He is not allowed to acknowledge it. Damn if feels good to be a gangster.
No no no. Fuzz told us that the MSM may get things wrong but they don’t intentionally lie like Fox. And Fuzz calls it like he sees it.
Calls it like he sees it, from his monocular, myopic, point of view. More like he lies it like he feels it. He doesn't pay it, he flees it.
I’d disagree that it wasn’t the right thing to do. Perhaps the officer could have exposed himself and if the intruder then continued forward, then shoot but we know if she had been successful in entering; a) others are right behind her, b) it could have easily become a blood bath and c) the welfare of the people in the chamber would have been in peril.
There was no way they could allow the mob to get access to the legislators.
a) assumption? Ass out of u and me? Resulted in a needless and useless death.
b) it easlily BECAME a bloodbath. Ashli was shot and bled. The response far surpassed the threat. I thought you idiots tore up the country to stop cops from doing exactly what this cop did. He shot first. He was never in any real danger at the moment he fired. He doesn't get to look into the future and surmise a person may eventually pose a threat. That is not good enough for deadly force.
c) You have already acknowledged there were heavily armed police on the scene. M16 will win against a Trump flag draped over the shoulders. NO ONE on the other side of that door was ever in any danger. That was a primary planning point.

Your ignorance disappoints me.
 
Where do bank fees come from, shinbone?
They come from the banks themselves. They sure don't come from bank regs removal idiot ex President.
"In 2018 under the Trump administration, some of those rules were rolled back, allowing banks with less than $250 billion in assets to be exempt from the tests, including Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. In the wake of those two bank failures, President Biden said he will ask Congress and regulators to strengthen the requirements once again for small and mid-sized banks."

 
Which parts were slave owners lending out their slaves for infrastructure projects? The Hoover dam? (Clearly named after president J. EDGAR!,)

Railroads? Bridges?

Or were they picking cotton on the owners huge plantations?
Doesn't matter. Their free forced labor was building the country for the profit of others. And getting killed for doing it. Again, what's the problem? What's YOUR problem?
 
large is a relative term. Does a bricklayer have a job that an architect didn't design? Who decided where the train tracks were laid? Who wrote the greatest document ever created by a government?
Large meaning slaves in huge numbers disproportionately gave their lives & labor for the benefit of the country w/o reward other than an early death in most cases. Those you cite had a choice WTF they did. So what slaves did in relative terms was huge. Descendants of slaves have as much or more right to be proud of what they did for this country as anyone. Slave owners wrote the document you reference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dionysus444
People keep talking about rigged elections here w/o defining rigged. Is this rigged elections?

"Democrats and their progressive allies are vastly expanding their unprecedented efforts, begun in 2020, to use private money to influence and run public elections.
Supported by groups with more than $1 billion at their disposal, according to public records, these partisan groups are working with state and local boards to influence functions that have long been the domain of government or political parties.
Registering and turning out voters - once handled primarily by political parties – and design of election office websites and mail-in ballots are being handed over to those same nonprofits, which are staffed by progressive activists that include former Democratic Party advocates, organized labor adherents and community organizers."

 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: jameslee32
I’d disagree that it wasn’t the right thing to do. Perhaps the officer could have exposed himself and if the intruder then continued forward, then shoot but we know if she had been successful in entering; a) others are right behind her, b) it could have easily become a blood bath and c) the welfare of the people in the chamber would have been in peril.
There was no way they could allow the mob to get access to the legislators.
I get what you're saying but no one else had to be shot that day. She didn't either. They could've tried to subdue her with nonlethal force at least first. I understand why the officer shot for all the reasons you list, but we have to limit lethal force to the most extreme situations or it will be abused. America and its cops have a shoot first ask questions later mentality and culture that we must break. That is why we have the all the gun death problems like school shootings that other places don't, even ones with lots of guns per capita. We all think we live in the Wild West deep in our American lizard brains. Guns don't solve problems. Working on them does.
 
The Patriot founders of this country literally attacked their own government.
They weren't British patriots. They were rebels who by your metric would be patriotic to a new breakaway government/country. Is that who/what you're identifying as? Been thinking about MTG's national divorce?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rqarnold
Tucker’s next video project will be to cherry pick through thousands of hours of WW2 video footage to put together a montage showing the Nazi’s generosity in offering the Jewish people an all expense paid scenic holiday by train to a sprawling resort in the Polish countryside.
Wow. Tucker obviously unveiled video you could not handle forcing petty triggered postings. So interesting how people never want the full picture, but rather prefer packets of info served up to meet their preconceived narrative.

You can blame your heroes in Congress. Had they just front-loaded the actual story, your nemesis has no scoop.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT