ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Do you think a Georgia progressive should be allowed to vote for Kemp in the primaries and Abrams the cow in the general?
 
Lol. Not even close man.

You started w cigarettes vs guns. And i debunked that "fact".

Then you "redirected" to guns and children. So i debunked that too.

1. You have not shown any previous "pro gun" posts as i first politely requested.
2. You have not responded to my common sense proposal (mandatory gun safety class in hs).
3. You say you care about children, yet you are okay with murdering hundreds of thousands a year.

i'm starting to believe you are not discussing in good faith. You simply want govt control of everything.
None of the liberals here can be taken seriously about protecting children as long as they are for killing millions of babies. Their position is purely political and agenda driven. They could give two sh*ts about the lives lost in these shootings.
 
Does Georgia have an open primary?
Yes. Do you think it is a good idea? I never really paid much attention to primary elections. Never voted in one. But when I see the staggeringly lopsided wins for Kemp and the Riff-Raff burger it caused me to look into it. A fair amount of states have it. Seems like a really terrible idea to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rupp876
Yes. Do you think it is a good idea? I never really paid much attention to primary elections. Never voted in one. But when I see the staggeringly lopsided wins for Kemp and the Riff-Raff burger it caused me to look into it. A fair amount of states have it. Seems like a really terrible idea to me.
I favor dismantling all primaries as they are are constructed and just run all candidates in one big primary election. The top 2 then move to the general. Even in a closed primary, nothing would stop anyone from registering in the opposite party and having the same effect and this happens in states where one party tends to dominate anyway. Also, independents don't get a say in who they are left with voting for in a general election, which is what happens in Kentucky, and that's ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anthony B
All primaries should be on the same day. It is absurd that some states really don't even get a say in who the Presidential candidate is. I live in Indiana and and spent the first 34 years of my life in Kentucky. Never once had a say in who is running.

I mean WTF makes Iowa and New Hampshire so special?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JStaff2187
Yes. Do you think it is a good idea? I never really paid much attention to primary elections. Never voted in one. But when I see the staggeringly lopsided wins for Kemp and the Riff-Raff burger it caused me to look into it. A fair amount of states have it. Seems like a really terrible idea to me.
Explains how Kemp had such a big lead on Perdue. Abrams ran unopposed and Dems voted for Kemp.
 
FT8kL0fXwAANtXm
 
Yes. Do you think it is a good idea? I never really paid much attention to primary elections. Never voted in one. But when I see the staggeringly lopsided wins for Kemp and the Riff-Raff burger it caused me to look into it. A fair amount of states have it. Seems like a really terrible idea to me.
I live here and, yes, its a terrible idea. It allows the system to be gamed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anthony B
None of the liberals here can be taken seriously about protecting children as long as they are for killing millions of babies. Their position is purely political and agenda driven. They could give two sh*ts about the lives lost in these shootings.
If guns were renamed to uterus, the pro-birth scum on the right would be ready to regulate the hell out of them. Political and agenda driven . . . pot meet kettle.
 
Yes. Do you think it is a good idea? I never really paid much attention to primary elections. Never voted in one. But when I see the staggeringly lopsided wins for Kemp and the Riff-Raff burger it caused me to look into it. A fair amount of states have it. Seems like a really terrible idea to me.
They saw a 7% turnout for Pubs by Dems in Ga primary. Election day polls showed it wasn't for nefarious reasons. Tons of dems are tired of the woke stuff, high inflation and grooming children.
 
Not really sure what you are asking here. But, then, I suspect you aren’t really interested in an answer.
I'm asking if you'll be happy if USSC overturns Roe - because it will be Mitch's fault if they do. I will. Not hard. No idea why you responded to me to begin with.
 
I favor dismantling all primaries as they are are constructed and just run all candidates in one big primary election. The top 2 then move to the general. Even in a closed primary, nothing would stop anyone from registering in the opposite party and having the same effect and this happens in states where one party tends to dominate anyway. Also, independents don't get a say in who they are left with voting for in a general election, which is what happens in Kentucky, and that's ridiculous.
I couldn't care less about independents. They have no principles, just turn with the wind. Screw em. Besides, they can run in the general election as write-ins.
 
Last edited:
All primaries should be on the same day. It is absurd that some states really don't even get a say in who the Presidential candidate is. I live in Indiana and and spent the first 34 years of my life in Kentucky. Never once had a say in who is running.

I mean WTF makes Iowa and New Hampshire so special?
There's no laws stopping states from having earlier primaries. States jockey their primary date all the time.
 
1
I will exalt You, my God, O King,
And [with gratitude and submissive wonder] I will bless Your name forever and ever.

2
Every day I will bless You and lovingly praise You;
Yes, [with awe-inspired reverence] I will praise Your name forever and ever.

3
Great is the Lord, and highly to be praised,
And His greatness is [so vast and profound as to be] unsearchable [incomprehensible to man].

4
One generation shall praise Your works to another,
And shall declare Your mighty and remarkable acts.

Psalms 145 AMP
 
They saw a 7% turnout for Pubs by Dems in Ga primary. Election day polls showed it wasn't for nefarious reasons. Tons of dems are tired of the woke stuff, high inflation and grooming children.
So you think those Dems will vote for Kemp in the general election as well? I hope you are right but I'd be a little surprised. I don't care much for Kemp but anything is better than the Heifer. Unfortunately GA is to the point where I'm starting to wonder what the hell is wrong with those people. Apart from Dems gaming the system, I see little reason to believe the Raffensburger nut could get anywhere near that many votes.
 
Last edited:
I've read 7% of Dim voters shifted to Pubs. OTOH, Kemp more likely to defeat Abrams as long as the Trump voters don't take their ball & go home - as happened in the 2020 Senate run offs. They'll then deserve Abrams.

lmao, kemp helped steal the election against Trump.

you seem very liberal and prod Biden. Real conservatives do not agree with you.

Vhcat70 is like Bill Kristol and the Lincoln group (Lincoln group supports pedophilia)
 
So you think those Dems will vote for Kemp in the general election as well? I hope you are right but I'd be a little surprised. I don't care much for Kemp but anything is better than the Heifer. Unfortunately GA is to the point where I'm starting to wonder what the hell is wrong with those people. Apart from Dems gaming the system, I see little reason to believe the Raffensburger nut could get anywhere near that many votes.
I have no idea. I just read an article that was absolutely shocked at their results. It wasn't like they were expecting inflation, the economy, immigration and ww3 were gonna be more important than republicans being mean.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT