ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
That and when the big push started in the 80s and the name was changed to 'gay'.....it was just an 'alternative lifestyle'.
Homosexuals and Lesbians certainly hijacked the word Gay. I always thought it strange some of the unhappiest people in our society would take the word gay.

My sister in law was named Gay and she changed her name to Gayle about 5 years after the name was hijacked.

Now the movement is one of the most militant groups in our society. They want total control of everything from the schools to the work place. And they usually get what they want.
 

These people are unbelievable...

Again, they sort of f'd up when they encouraged widespread rioting and destruction, prompting THEIR SUPPORTERS to buy guns in record numbers. Make no mistake, it was THEIR PEOPLE in urban areas who rushed out to buy 9mm, .223...MILITARY GRADE WEAPONS...because for the first time in their lives, they realized the government will not protect them, and they had the right to defend themselves against harm. The shooting sports have exploded with FEMALES. Black women have purchased guns like never before.

Now, you're gonna tell those people they are wrong? Or, that THEY can keep their weapons of destruction, but certain other people from different walks of life, who own the same weapons, those people are a problem?

Because that's sort of what you're seeing on the news. Oh, old white man..."Hey, why do you need guns for anything but hunting?". How about you go down to the hood and ask why they need guns for anything but hunting?
 
And now all this attention guarantees more acts just like this in coming days. It will have the same effect as the media promoting mass shootings

This was my exact thought when I saw the story. Fine to say some crazed lunatic smeared cream on something. Stupid to say why the dumbass lunatic did what they did. Doesn’t matter why, certainly not when it’s just publicizing their crazed inner thoughts.
 
These people are unbelievable...

Again, they sort of f'd up when they encouraged widespread rioting and destruction, prompting THEIR SUPPORTERS to buy guns in record numbers. Make no mistake, it was THEIR PEOPLE in urban areas who rushed out to buy 9mm, .223...MILITARY GRADE WEAPONS...because for the first time in their lives, they realized the government will not protect them, and they had the right to defend themselves against harm. The shooting sports have exploded with FEMALES. Black women have purchased guns like never before.

Now, you're gonna tell those people they are wrong? Or, that THEY can keep their weapons of destruction, but certain other people from different walks of life, who own the same weapons, those people are a problem?

Because that's sort of what you're seeing on the news. Oh, old white man..."Hey, why do you need guns for anything but hunting?". How about you go down to the hood and ask why they need guns for anything but hunting?
Do they call it hunting in chicago?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sawnee Cat
Just remember, real assault weapons are already banned. Now, if they update any laws or try and amend the constitution with the phrase banning assault weapons using today's progressive mind set, any weapon used in an assault on anyone could technically be defined as an assault weapon according to today's fluid language and ever-changing definitions. Examples: Multiple genders, pregnant men, MAP (minor attracted person aka Pedo), peaceful demonstrations (killings, rape, fires, destruction of property, etc...) insurrectionist (innocent unarmed demonstrators) and the list goes on.
 
FUAvAMSWIAAGFb8
 
Just remember, real assault weapons are already banned. Now, if they update any laws or try and amend the constitution with the phrase banning assault weapons using today's progressive mind set, any weapon used in an assault on anyone could technically be defined as an assault weapon according to today's fluid language and ever-changing definitions. Examples: Multiple genders, pregnant men, MAP (minor attracted person aka Pedo), peaceful demonstrations (killings, rape, fires, destruction of property, etc...) insurrectionist (innocent unarmed demonstrators) and the list goes on.

Great point. We know from experience that Obama admin often changed the definitions inside the laws rather than change the laws themselves. That way they got what they wanted with much less opposition. Sometimes the definition could even be updated administratively. We also know Obama is running this admin so that's certainly an angle they will consider.
 
Great point. We know from experience that Obama admin often changed the definitions inside the laws rather than change the laws themselves. That way they got what they wanted with much less opposition. Sometimes the definition could even be updated administratively. We also know Obama is running this admin so that's certainly an angle they will consider.
If they do, here is my response:
Not-an-Assault-rifle.png
 
Dems, the party of pure evil, has always been quick to call someone else fascist while acting like fascists. Always weaponizing government agencies against their political opposition. In their warped and deluded mind, they believe parents are the bad guys for resisting tyrannical bureaucrats whose decisions make no logical sense outside of devotion to their party.
 
It would have been soooo easy for the Dems to pass gun laws that the majority of Americans could have supported. But Biden has already gone to the "you - a responsible citizen - doesn't need a gun except to go shoot deer or protect yourself from intruders" as if that has anything to do with the constitution.

I strongly believe we need to do a better job controlling who gets a gun. You may say that violates your rights. Well guess what, some psychopath who should never have a weapon, procuring a gun and killing me violates my rights too. So we need to find a middle ground.

I also firmly believe that if you ban AR's but do nothing with handguns school shooters will switch over to handguns and not miss a beat. So that's a non-starter to make any difference.

So why not do this:
  1. Ban the purchase and ownership of semi-automatics from anyone under 21.
    1. Reduces the chance psychos whose brains haven't fully developed can get weapons that can kill a lot of people quickly
    2. Gives a few more years to weed these losers out
    3. If you are under 21 and go hunting or shooting with a friend who is over 21, he can let you use his but you can't keep it on you without him around
    4. If shit goes down and we fall into a civil war or something, people over 21 can hand people under 21 a semi and we've got a militia which is what part of the 2nd amendment talked about.
  2. After age 21, you need gun safety certification to purchase a semi-automatic gun or revolver. You need to renew this every couple of years or so. It will cost several hundred bucks.
    1. Responsible gun owners: this is a GREAT thing. It will weed out lazy ass criminals from owning weapons.
    2. Yeah - it will put a slight burden on you - but this is designed to keep some of the people who have nothing going for them from keeping weapons.
  3. For handguns, extra licensing and training are required. This will require costs more in the $1K+ level.
    1. The majority of murders and suicides involve handguns
    2. They are easy to conceal
    3. They are less valuable in terms of defense from the government than say an AR
    4. You need to prove you still own said handgun each year
    5. This is a larger burden for responsible gun owners, but it will shrink the murder and suicide rate significantly.
  4. If you feel your life is in danger, you can put in for a temporary permit to get a handgun to give you access while you apply for the permit. You must go to the police and make your case and describe why you are in danger.
    1. This is what the police are for.
    2. And if you are doing illegal stuff and dealing with bad people and therefore don't want to go to the cops, well, tough shit.
 
You think God would approve of guns? He made this amazing creation and all they care about is being allowed to freely murder each other as efficiently as possible. Seems to me like God would see firearms to be a sinful abomination. They break his most important commandments and go against everything Jesus taught. Of course God is made up so who cares!
q8ol19s0ih291.jpg
 
What's everybody got on the grill today? A few steaks here.

No grill :(

But I did have a steak. Kroger had a sale on NY strips so i got a 10oz for $8. Pat it dry, season both sides generously with kosher salt and fresh ground pepper. Oven at 450. Put a cast iron skillet on the stove at medium high. 1 minute on each side to sear it. 3 minutes in the oven, flip the steak, 3 more minutes, and then let it rest. Comes out nice and juicy
 
What's everybody got on the grill today? A few steaks here.
We BBQ'd some pork and ribs. Grilled some ears of corn, had a mess of fried okra and of course the old standby baked beans. We also had sweet potatoes and Southern style potato salad that my mama use to make. Had a nice "relish" tray. Then we cut a nice red watermelon.

For desert chocolate cake, coconut cake and deep dish pecan pie.

Plenty of beverages of your choice to wash it all down.

Now we are going to sit down and watch "Private Ryan" for the 20th straight Memorial Day. Then if we are still awake, watch Midway
 
It would have been soooo easy for the Dems to pass gun laws that the majority of Americans could have supported. But Biden has already gone to the "you - a responsible citizen - doesn't need a gun except to go shoot deer or protect yourself from intruders" as if that has anything to do with the constitution.

I strongly believe we need to do a better job controlling who gets a gun. You may say that violates your rights. Well guess what, some psychopath who should never have a weapon, procuring a gun and killing me violates my rights too. So we need to find a middle ground.

I also firmly believe that if you ban AR's but do nothing with handguns school shooters will switch over to handguns and not miss a beat. So that's a non-starter to make any difference.

So why not do this:
  1. Ban the purchase and ownership of semi-automatics from anyone under 21.
    1. Reduces the chance psychos whose brains haven't fully developed can get weapons that can kill a lot of people quickly
    2. Gives a few more years to weed these losers out
    3. If you are under 21 and go hunting or shooting with a friend who is over 21, he can let you use his but you can't keep it on you without him around
    4. If shit goes down and we fall into a civil war or something, people over 21 can hand people under 21 a semi and we've got a militia which is what part of the 2nd amendment talked about.
  2. After age 21, you need gun safety certification to purchase a semi-automatic gun or revolver. You need to renew this every couple of years or so. It will cost several hundred bucks.
    1. Responsible gun owners: this is a GREAT thing. It will weed out lazy ass criminals from owning weapons.
    2. Yeah - it will put a slight burden on you - but this is designed to keep some of the people who have nothing going for them from keeping weapons.
  3. For handguns, extra licensing and training are required. This will require costs more in the $1K+ level.
    1. The majority of murders and suicides involve handguns
    2. They are easy to conceal
    3. They are less valuable in terms of defense from the government than say an AR
    4. You need to prove you still own said handgun each year
    5. This is a larger burden for responsible gun owners, but it will shrink the murder and suicide rate significantly.
  4. If you feel your life is in danger, you can put in for a temporary permit to get a handgun to give you access while you apply for the permit. You must go to the police and make your case and describe why you are in danger.
    1. This is what the police are for.
    2. And if you are doing illegal stuff and dealing with bad people and therefore don't want to go to the cops, well, tough shit.
How about “shall not be infringed.”
 
How about “shall not be infringed.”
Well Dave, it's already infringed upon given that you can't buy an automatic weapon. Furthermore, background checks were considered legal too. Furthermore, laws limiting those under 21 to purchase firearms (i.e., in Florida) are on the books.

There's also a part of that amendment: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

So the way that it's written gives some people interpretation that it's intended to cover a well-regulated militia.

My point is, it's a little trickier than "shall not be infringed".
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT