ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
FLJzDfVXMAcMK02
 
He didn’t lie though, the DOJ released the memo on election night proving as much. Timing was odd, almost as if they didn’t want it to be noticed.
There’s also the deal where the jury forewoman lied in her jury selection interview and then the judge wouldn’t allow a retrial.
There is literal testimony from the Clinton campaign that they created the Russian narrative on July 28 2016, and the next day, in more testimony, the FBI had a meeting over it. The whole thing was BS, but you just can’t let it go, you were conned, wrong, bamboozled.
There is also FOIA request with handwritten notes from Brennan (IIRC) from THE meeting when the russian collusion hoax was put into play. The actual smoking gun, barrel hot, smoke coming out, in his hands...literally (almost literally). But the smoking gun on that hoax. No matter, ignorant ppl don't want to know ...
 
He did have a speech - pretty early on i think - where he very specifically and very unnecessarily (not to mention- divisively) ridiculed and denigrated the text of and excerpted portions of Jesus Christ’s Sermon on the Mount as well as Jewish portions of
scripture from Mosaic Law)

His administration ushered in poorly planned and controversial health care reforms that he and his fellow professional politicians - were exempt from)

His admin’s AG refused to respond to congressional sopoena (sp?) on Gun Running to Mexico with intent to undermine 2A rights) — That AG was censored but not held accountable

He and his administration personally showed open contempt for border patrol members who were disciplined (fired?) for doing their job

and he wasn’t frankly a man or political figure of any sincere merit or substance — I see him as an arrogant traitor who openly sympathizes with Marxist / Communist theory & objectives

I think it’s fair to call his admin divisive - but it’s more of a systemic political rot and malaise than it is anything else.....

Point is - in retrospect - i don’t believe he was THAT much worse than GWB

So i don’t single that admin out as a stand-alone case of divisive & ineffective Govt
I think he did all that and much more ... Trayvon could've been my husband's son. He was supposed to be the "post racial" president, turned out to be the "most racial" president. Ferguson, ACORN, "evolved beliefs"... Dion, get a different history book.
 
And people wonder why we hate the MSM/big media/the left. People like Reid are celebrated and given giant megaphones to spew utter horsesh*t yet folks like Rogan or Rand Paul need to be silenced.
people were saying "would SCOTUS kick back several constitutional amendments to the states". bunch of no-thinking idiots...IF it is in the constitution, it cannot be unconstitutional (kind of like the 2A) LOL
 
Enjoyed your post except for this, they all have to buy plans on the exchanges now like everyone else. I’m not arguing the overall downstream effects of the Affordable Care Act, that’s for another day, but specifically what you allege here isn’t true. They get juicy subsidies for sure but an amendment to the ACA itself actually made healthcare worse for politicians as they have to purchase from the exchanges now and don’t have access to the sweetheart Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.


Hey - do you listen to Rush?
i picture you as maybe NOT listening to them but you never know


every time i see your screen name i think of their 28 min long song “Hemispheres” where they describe battles and other interactions between the pantheon of Greek gods

and there is a specific reference to Dionysus during a really cool passage of that Uber-Nerd Anthem


So there you have it
 
There is also FOIA request with handwritten notes from Brennan (IIRC) from THE meeting when the russian collusion hoax was put into play. The actual smoking gun, barrel hot, smoke coming out, in his hands...literally (almost literally). But the smoking gun on that hoax. No matter, ignorant ppl don't want to know ...
If Wikileaks truly received hacked info on the DNC, and Russia truly hacked it why didn't the Mueller investigation interview Assange? It wasn't like he was hiding and couldn't be found. It seems that their failure to interview the guy or group at the center of the info being released is gross incompetence.
 
Gas Dropped 30 cents today. Lumber futures took a huge dive. Thanks Biden for dick punching that inflation! He just never stops getting shit done.
Bill Barr now says their was no election fraud. We just can't stop winning!
To quite the great Bill “We realized from the beginning it was just bullshit,”

He told Karl that even if the machines had somehow changed the tally, the issue would be made obvious when the votes were recounted by hand.

“It’s a counting machine, and they save everything that was counted,” Barr said. “So you just reconcile the two. There had been no discrepancy reported anywhere, and I’m still not aware of any discrepancy.”
* KA - BOOM *


DAMN IT!!!!!!!! What the HELL is going on here?

Thanks, Jimmy, er, I mean Joe.
 
I think he did all that and much more ... Trayvon could've been my husband's son. He was supposed to be the "post racial" president, turned out to be the "most racial" president. Ferguson, ACORN, "evolved beliefs"... Dion, get a different history book.


He (his administration) also signed particularly damaging and needlessly sovereignty surrendering treaties with the United Nations

Two that come to mind are (1) The agreements to a new type of actionable security council committee of nations (US, A rando Euro like Sweden and about 8–10 african countries)

overt purpose is to “take security and military type action within an other nations if civilians are threatened”

The other was a needlessly generous revision to one of our missile/nuclear treaties with Russia ....the treaty quickly dismantled the USAFs Minuteman III MIRV capability — and that has been done (that means each of those ICBMs now can only carry a single warhead as opposed to their previously independently targetable cluster of 5-7 warheads each)

Russia did not have to reciprocate anything on this one and continued their development of Hypersonic (snd other advanced delivery sustained) weapons and aerial surveillance:eek:ver flights and inspections of our silos, storage facilities and mothballed site in AZ)

i was working there with an aerial photo of our significantly expanding Raytheon site showed up on Sputnik.com and RT....that was a no-no

but it’s a long story

finally- his administration established the Strong Cities Network under treaty agreement with the UN ....a
network of US MAYORS was also established to have audiences with the Vatican and others to pledge and promote UN goals / ideals and standards within their backyard


you’re right - there was more

in fairness- i’ll say a couple of good things about that administration

1) the excitement and hope for a truly different type of President that was so prevalent after his election- was infectious....i didn’t even mind his lack of executives experience...i wanted sn outsider ....

2) My company at the time received bids for modernization of some of our our nuclear assets under his administration - that step was overdue and pretty well outlined (can’t say more there)

3) He started a withdrawal from Afghanistan which i wholeheartedly supported / it needed to be strategic and well orchestrated...but it never fully materialized

Everyone on here needs to come up w/an item or two you appreciate about your “political opposites” in here ...play nicely as UK fans right?
[laughing]
 
What specifically did he do?
Oh I don't know....After saying for months that the election was rigged.....held a massive rally down the street from Congress on the day the election results were being certified....telling the angry crowd that the election was stolen.....You can't be weak and have to fight for your country.....that he really won the election.....that Mike Pence can overturn it but may or may not do what is right....and that he's going to walk down to the Capitol with them to let Congress know how they feel about the stolen election.
What could possibly go wrong with a mob of enraged people that includes far right conspiracy theorists, white supremacists and militia members????
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaBossIsBack
Oh I don't know....After saying for months that the election was rigged.....held a massive rally down the street from Congress on the day the election results were being certified....telling the angry crowd that the election was stolen.....You can't be weak and have to fight for your country.....that he really won the election.....that Mike Pence can overturn it but may or may not do what is right....and that he's going to walk down to the Capitol with them to let Congress know how they feel about the stolen election.
What could possibly go wrong with a mob of enraged people that includes far right conspiracy theorists, white supremacists and militia members????

Still squawking bullshit on your fake outrage and your liberal political fan fiction. That read like an over emotional teen diary. Lol. Fan fiction.
 
Oh I don't know....After saying for months that the election was rigged.....held a massive rally down the street from Congress on the day the election results were being certified....telling the angry crowd that the election was stolen.....You can't be weak and have to fight for your country.....that he really won the election.....that Mike Pence can overturn it but may or may not do what is right....and that he's going to walk down to the Capitol with them to let Congress know how they feel about the stolen election.
What could possibly go wrong with a mob of enraged people that includes far right conspiracy theorists, white supremacists and militia members????
FLLQPAgXIAozBPn
 
Great question and I appreciate the logical manner in which it was asked....
I would say if Fauci is saying one thing but the data coming from the hospitals contridicted him I would seriously start to question him.
I don't put much faith in individuals and tend to look at trends or larger pools of evidence.
As of today, the only thing that Fauci F'd up was the "don't need a mask" position he took at the beginning of the pandemic. I know that he was doing it to preserve PPE for the hospitals but it was most likely a lie to prevent a run on supplies....It undermined confidence in him on everything else going forward imo.
With all due respect, Fauci has done much more than tell a little white lie about the needs for masks. He has been exposed as a liar by Senator Paul and other senators in hearings regarding the origins of the virus, the efficacy of the vaccines. His "I am the science" hubris is frankly offensive. I do agree there's very little reason to give any credence to anything he has to say anymore. If he wasn't a protected civil servant, he could have been / should have been fired a long time ago IMO.
 
Last edited:
Still squawking bullshit on your fake outrage and your liberal political fan fiction. That read like an over emotional teen diary. Lol. Fan fiction.
Bet you won't be so quick to defend the next Jan 6th riot after Biden loses and he holds a massive rally to say he really won.....while thousands of BLM radicals surround the Capitol waving their BLM flags.....break thru doors/windows to get inside....attack the Capitol police.....all while Biden tells Kamala Harris to overturn the election that Biden lost.
See how that works? The BLM mob using bear spray, breaking windows and beating Capitol police to get in is just "legitimate political discourse" right?
 
This is it in a nutshell.....Follow the science @Gassy_Knowles
Thanks for the link. I frankly didn't see anything egregious in his comments from the linked article. If Rogan is wrong, it's incumbent on other people to put out better information. Silencing someone for stating undesirable or even somewhat inaccurate doesn't solve anything except give the fearmongers more control over the information in the public domain. Like I said previously, I don't listen to Joe Rogan; but I don't see how his comments would lead to anyone dying - that's a laughable premise except the consequences to free speech are so serious.
 
Last edited:
Bet you won't be so quick to defend the next Jan 6th riot after Biden loses and he holds a massive rally to say he really won.....while thousands of BLM radicals surround the Capitol waving their BLM flags.....break thru doors/windows to get inside....attack the Capitol police.....all while Biden tells Kamala Harris to overturn the election that Biden lost.
See how that works? The BLM mob using bear spray, breaking windows and beating Capitol police to get in is just "legitimate political discourse" right?
Sam, you know damn well that the 2020 election was a sham. Trump stating correctly that it was going to be fraudulent isn't why people were upset or went to DC. We all watched it happen in real time, it's not as if the 2020 election was a ho hum routine election. It was ran in the least secure way possible, with patterns broken that had always been signs of who would win, millions of unaccounted ballots still viable after the election day totals known, private 3rd parties paying for access to the ballots prior to election day, poll watchers prevented from watching, and on and on. It was a sham, the Democrats that are currently in control of the party have led it off a cliff and they are desperate.
 
Possibly. Depends on how far they go. If someone is spreading the news that Biden is the Antichrist and will be coming for their soul soon.....I understand why the government would take action. These days who knows???


So that means Antifa and BLM fall into that category too right? I mean they fit the description. But somehow I think it’s geared more towards normal, law abiding citizens who just think the Constitution and Bill of Rights are something that should be defended.

We all know this is for anyone that opposes or criticizes the Biden and leftists global regime.
 
Sam, you know damn well that the 2020 election was a sham. Trump stating correctly that it was going to be fraudulent isn't why people were upset or went to DC. We all watched it happen in real time, it's not as if the 2020 election was a ho hum routine election. It was ran in the least secure way possible, with patterns broken that had always been signs of who would win, millions of unaccounted ballots still viable after the election day totals known, private 3rd parties paying for access to the ballots prior to election day, poll watchers prevented from watching, and on and on. It was a sham, the Democrats that are currently in control of the party have led it off a cliff and they are desperate.
 
Great question and I appreciate the logical manner in which it was asked....
I would say if Fauci is saying one thing but the data coming from the hospitals contridicted him I would seriously start to question him.
I don't put much faith in individuals and tend to look at trends or larger pools of evidence.
As of today, the only thing that Fauci F'd up was the "don't need a mask" position he took at the beginning of the pandemic. I know that he was doing it to preserve PPE for the hospitals but it was most likely a lie to prevent a run on supplies....It undermined confidence in him on everything else going forward imo.
Ok, not really what I was looking for and you contradicted yourself as well. First you basically said you trust everything Fauci says except for back when he said we don't need masks. Did you question that when he said it? Then you go on to say you don't put much faith in individuals, yet you give Fauci your full faith and trust.

There are countless compilation videos of Fauci contradicting himself. Why do you give him your trust? What qualifies him anymore than anyone else with similar credentials to be the arbiter of truth? Have you even studied the mans history? Do you understand who all he's in bed with? The kinds of research he's funded and done? His relationships with China? With Pharmaceutical companies? With the government? If any one person needs to be questioned or discredited, it's that guy. And yet when someone highly credentialed, but without all the compromised history and connections, says something to refute Lord Fauci, they get cancelled, silenced, censored.

As for hospitals, you realize they get paid for every Covid Patient by the government, right? Covid is a cash cow for hospitals, to the point it compromises and corrupts their reporting. It's caused hospitals to count deaths incorrectly. It's what has now led to many states "adjusting" how they count Covid deaths. (The whole "with" or "from" argument) The head of the CDC even said that 75% had four or more comorbidities. I wonder how many had even three or two or even one significant comorbidity?

So a study from the NIH that says Natural Immunity is showing to be at least, if not better protection than the vaccine carries no weight with you. It's misinformation. If it's not allowed on facebook or Twitter, or if the media isn't discussing it, then it's misinformation.

Or How about a study from the same NIH that concluded "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally." Why is that not front page news? Why isn't the mainstream media all over that? Why is the Federal Government trying to hide that fact and censor anyone who brings it up or label it misinformation? You see, to me, the fact they are restricting the use of things like Ivermectin, making it extremely difficult to get and not sanctioning it's use is tantamount to crimes against humanity by our government.

So again, I ask, what credentials does one need before you will trust them? Again, why do you put all your eggs in one untrustworthy basket?
 
Sure, if you think the fraud came from machines swapping votes, but that isn't how it was done, and you know that. The insecurity came from millions of absentee ballots flooding the system, unaccounted drop boxes, private entities having access to "cure" ballots prior to election day, days after election day when absentee ballots were still legal, votes counted when no poll watchers were present, and on and on.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT