I think he wanted them to use computer hacking tactics that he couldn't get away with because they're illegal.Great, what does that mean? They also indicted 9 Russian agents for hacking the DNC server that they never saw, and the only group that saw it didn't know if it had even been hacked. They indicted 9 people they knew would never see a courtroom, for show.
What do you think Trump got from Russia? The narrative was created by the Clinton campaign, it wasn't real.
You actually believe that ignorant drivel to be a stroke of genius. Welcome to ignore.Except that’s not how it is. But it appears all your free thinking has somehow led you back to regurgitating right wing media talking points. You’ve come full circle in your search for “enlightenment”. Bravo 👏🏼
Indeed. Russia collusion case has been seriously debunked.It isn't worth responding to anyone who thinks the Russian collusion case was legit. How much more debunked can a story be? If someone is still pushing that, just stop interacting with them because they're definitely a troll
Get down on you knees......under your desk.......bend over put your head on your knees........hope like hell that I am in proper position as Sister Mary Ann called it........because she would kick your feet if you weren't......since I was a tall kid..........I just remember the atomic bomb drills and shelters of the '50s.
Whatever that process is - you'd have to show me the relevant part of the Constitution that it exists - doesn't include the VP that I've ever seen. I mean whatever process doesn't have to include the VP doing anything other than his only stated roll of counting.Then why is there a process established and in place per the Constitution if the vote is tainted?
Computer hacking tactics? God al'mighty, there is zero evidence the DNC was hacked Sam, thats straight from Crowdsrikes testimony. There was no Russian Collusion.I think he wanted them to use computer hacking tactics that he couldn't get away with because they're illegal.
I don't think he actually got much of anything....but it wasn't for lack of trying.
Btw...I was not a Hillary fan and was actually happy to see Trump elected. I thought his vitriol in the campaign was an act and he was going to be a centrist businessman. Initially, I was all for him.
It wasn't until his non stop idiotic tweets and whacked out behavior in the Oval Office that I soured on him.
The Jan 6th rally/riot was the straw that broke the camel's back for me. That's when you'll notice that I became much more active on here regarding him. I truly see Trump as a danger to our country for multiple reasons.
You do know that it was a GOP led Senate investigation committee that found Russia did interfere in the election right? The only debate revolves around Trump's level of involvement. That is debatable.Indeed. Russia collusion case has been seriously debunked.
Do you want to be represented, or ruled? The establishment think they rule us, Trump was a threat to that, or the people that elected him were a threat to that.Much of what you say is true. Where I disagree with you is on the view that Trump is the answer to solving these problems. Imo he makes it much worse.
He is way to divisive to bring us together.
I do agree that the country has serious issues and that the Dems are a part of it as well.
The establishment doesn't play by the rules either. Were that the case, Hunter Biden would have been front & center in the 2020 election & the Trump Russia hoax would have never existed. I could go on. But your mind is twisted if you think the establishment, as a whole, isn't as corrupt as Trump.It's ironic that his loyal followers see him as the truth and justice warrior where the majority of Americans, like myself, see him as a lying, cheating con man who is just the opposite of who you think he is.
He's a NYC con man who tried to overrule the will of the people and trash our democracy.
Sorry but he's way more corrupt than the establishment. At least they play by the rules of our Constitution even if the rules are bent in their favor.
Define interference. Posting silly memes would be interference, but did it affect anything, and was that before or after the Clinton campaign started the Russian collusion nonsense?You do know that it was a GOP led Senate investigation committee that found Russia did interfere in the election right? The only debate revolves around Trump's level of involvement. That is debatable.
Russian interference is not.
I'm not saying Congress can't contest it. I'm saying that's not the VP's role.Then why is there other ways to establish the President?
Why can States be contested in Congress if a Congressman and Senator contest a state?
Again, you’re stating this as if the 2020 election were like every other election we’ve conducted and followed the Constitution, it didn’t.
There was confusion after the election on what had occurred, with the info that’s info that’s come out since that electors didn’t have then the logical and legal decision would’ve been to delay the count.
Pence could’ve and should’ve.
I agree that Biden appears weak and senile. I'm just really hoping for a choice next election that doesn't include Biden or Trump.Computer hacking tactics? God al'mighty, there is zero evidence the DNC was hacked Sam, thats straight from Crowdsrikes testimony. There was no Russian Collusion.
I can understand not liking the tweets, but look at the country and world now, it's in a far worse place than it was when he left office. The danger isn't Trump, the danger are the ones that saw him, and in reality the people that elected him, as a threat to their grip on power.
Adding on to this... it cracks me up when these Leftists call Trump supporters a "cult".You continue to equate any republican with Trump. Everyone knows that it’s not a left vs right thing, it’s the swamp vs anyone that threatens their power. Most of the republicans in government never wanted Trump to begin with. He was an outsider who held the potential to expose them. And no matter what you think of Trump, he showed the world just how corrupt our government and media are.
The VP as the leader of the count can delay the count if there's uncertainty, he wouldn't be choosing anything. His role is to ensure the legitimacy of the process.I'm not saying Congress can't contest it. I'm saying that's not the VP's roll.
Biden isn't running anything, which is the problem. How many former Presidents stayed in DC after leaving office?I agree that Biden appears weak and senile. I'm just really hoping for a choice next election that doesn't include Biden or Trump.
All the motels in the area were filled by national news media in case there was a big story to report. I had out of town customers who couldn't get rooms anywhere relatively close by.
Jan 6th was a mostly peaceful protest. I do not agree with taking swings at the police and those who did should be dealt with in the same manner BLM/Antifa "protesters" have been handled. I also believe that those under arrest should be out on bail as quickly as the BLM/Antifa "protesters" were. I think the VPOTUS should contribute to their bail.Jan 6th wasn't a riot. It was a Nancy Pelosi Fed Fest
The Presidency is about much more than policies alone. They are the face, heart and soul of the nation. You can't enact policies that half the country likes while tweeting out "White Power" videos from the Villages in Florida. You can't put in Supreme Court Justices that half the country likes while saying the Presidential election is rigged before the election has even taken place....then hold rallies that result in our Capitol building being attacked and vandalized. Looking the other way as long as you like the policies on the books is BS.Adding on to this... it cracks me up when these Leftists call Trump supporters a "cult".
No one really cares about Trump.
We only care about the policies he enacted... the Left just isn't smart enough to understand this no matter how many times we tell them.
No, Dion is a communist, yet somehow an articulate and seemingly educated and semi intelligent one. A shame.Isnt it funny ... every few months a "new" lefty poster comes and tries to debate. Soon they are reduced to the laugh emoticon to try to cover up their lack of knowing stuff amd thinking things through. Lolol
I give "sort of" props to dion on this. He is warped in the head, if he is real, and may be a 14 yr old in the basement, but he tries. He got my movie reference very quickly several months ago. Of course, most bots would have cross referenced and got that too ... maybe i should take the prop back?
Science and scientific theories change over time as new data and information is acquired. It is a constant learning experience and part of the scientific method. Good thing we aren't using the same science, medicine and surgical techniques we used 500 years ago.Does anyone else remember the earthquake drills that were prevalent (at least in schools) in the fall of 1990?
After the SF earthquake of ‘89, a “doctor” (Browning) predicted a huge earthquake along a major Midwest fault line and even had the audacity to give a date (12/3/90). He supposedly had accurately predicted the date of the Sf quake.
I remember media reports shortly after the SF quake, stating that the Midwest quake was inevitable and that the more time it took before it occurred, the worse it will become. (I seem to recall someone saying that there was no way it would not occur by the year 2000, because there would he so much pressure).
Anyway, at school, we had drills and even left the building.
A day or two before the projected date, Browning backed off his prediction, and then changed course again.
It’s apparently part of the “scientist code”. Just make stuff up, watch people scramble, reverse course, reverse course again.
Marley that is not a very nice thing to say to me so close to Valentines Day. No heart shaped pizza for you!!No, Dion is a communist, yet somehow an articulate and seemingly educated and semi intelligent one. A shame.
But SCIENCE DUDE is just an absolute frothing at the mouth idiotic brainwashed fool, who presents lies as facts, and swallow the msm line hook line and sinker.
Explain. Give your best example.Even moreso, Trump showed us how corrupt he is.
They can ban you for anything it seems, revoke your privileges to post in certain threads and limit your posts for x amount of time. Continues to happen.God dangit man, still cant believe I cant post links or tweets. I wonder if the mods can ban somebody from posting certain things?
The Trump campaign got several things from Russia. Microtargeted Russian social media bots using the campaign’s internal data they provided to the Russians. Russian endorsement and hollow promises of less bellicose behavior. Coordinated dumps of hacked emails to counter news cycles that were bad for Trump(Billy Bush tape).What do you think Trump got from Russia? The narrative was created by the Clinton campaign, it wasn't real.
The Trump campaign got several things from Russia. Microtargeted Russian social media bots using the campaign’s internal data they provided to the Russians. Russian endorsement and hollow promises of less bellicose behavior. Coordinated dumps of hacked emails to counter news cycles that were bad for Trump(Billy Bush tape).
SureThe Trump campaign got several things from Russia. Microtargeted Russian social media bots using the campaign’s internal data they provided to the Russians. Russian endorsement and hollow promises of less bellicose behavior. Coordinated dumps of hacked emails to counter news cycles that were bad for Trump(Billy Bush tape).
The Trump campaign got several things from Russia. Microtargeted Russian social media bots using the campaign’s internal data they provided to the Russians. Russian endorsement and hollow promises of less bellicose behavior. Coordinated dumps of hacked emails to counter news cycles that were bad for Trump(Billy Bush tape).
Nixon didn't "give" any votes to Kennedy. Hawaii initially certified its electors and sent the results in. afterwards they did a recount and then recertified and resent the updated results. all Nixon did was open the newest certified results sent by the legislature. The state did it's job so he properly did his. He didn't try to acknowledge counterfeit electors sent by random Trump dipshits.The VP as the leader of the count can delay the count if there's uncertainty, he wouldn't be choosing anything. His role is to ensure the legitimacy of the process.
Hell, Nixon gave Hawaii's electoral votes that had been approved by the State for him, to Kennedy.
Nixon Adds Hawaii's 3 Electoral Votes To Kennedy's Column
On Friday, January 6, 1961, the electoral votes were tallied by roll-call in a joint session of Congress with Vice-President Richard M. Nixon presiding.
The roll-call went smoothly until Hawaii was reached. There were three sets of documents for Hawaii, which finally went to Kennedy after the official recount which had not been completed when the electors met in Honolulu on December 19th.
The tellers tossed that problem into Nixon's lap, and the Vice-President held without opposition that the latest document, dated January 4 and certifying the Kennedy electors, was the one that should be counted.
That made the presidential tally 303 for Kennedy, 219 for Nixon and 15 for Senator Harry F. Byrd of Virginia.
The outgoing Vice-President presided over the joint session under a constitutional provision that requires Congress to canvass the electoral votes. The votes actually were cast on December 19 by the electors of the 50 states.
Hawaii's vote was originally certified for Nixon, who held a 141 vote margin before a recount swung the state to Kennedy by 115 votes.
The point remains that the election didn't follow the Constitution, the discrepancies uncovered since then were unknown at the time. They were unknown because the law wasn't followed, and a delay of the electoral count would've been prudent to verify that we had a legitimate President.
Nixon had to pick from among multiple returns sent from Hawaii, signed by the governor, because they were a brand new state and were slow with the count and documentation. They were legitimate EC votes that didn’t effect the outcome. The alternate EC votes Trump had sent were not signed by their governors and did not meet the “safe harbor” requirements set up in the Electoral Count Act. As such Pence had no ability to consider them or halt the count as no states were in doubt. The formal contesting process that requires a House and Senate member that Hawley, Cruz et al. were attempting requires both the House and Senate to vote to set aside the EC votes. Which obviously wasn’t happening. Nothing to do with the VP. Pence could not have done what you’re proposing.The VP as the leader of the count can delay the count if there's uncertainty, he wouldn't be choosing anything. His role is to ensure the legitimacy of the process.
Hell, Nixon gave Hawaii's electoral votes that had been approved by the State for him, to Kennedy.
Nixon Adds Hawaii's 3 Electoral Votes To Kennedy's Column
On Friday, January 6, 1961, the electoral votes were tallied by roll-call in a joint session of Congress with Vice-President Richard M. Nixon presiding.
The roll-call went smoothly until Hawaii was reached. There were three sets of documents for Hawaii, which finally went to Kennedy after the official recount which had not been completed when the electors met in Honolulu on December 19th.
The tellers tossed that problem into Nixon's lap, and the Vice-President held without opposition that the latest document, dated January 4 and certifying the Kennedy electors, was the one that should be counted.
That made the presidential tally 303 for Kennedy, 219 for Nixon and 15 for Senator Harry F. Byrd of Virginia.
The outgoing Vice-President presided over the joint session under a constitutional provision that requires Congress to canvass the electoral votes. The votes actually were cast on December 19 by the electors of the 50 states.
Hawaii's vote was originally certified for Nixon, who held a 141 vote margin before a recount swung the state to Kennedy by 115 votes.
The point remains that the election didn't follow the Constitution, the discrepancies uncovered since then were unknown at the time. They were unknown because the law wasn't followed, and a delay of the electoral count would've been prudent to verify that we had a legitimate President.
lmao. Trump plan after his fatass is dragged out of the WH is to sell rally tickets and milk his sheep dry.
Science and scientific theories change over time as new data and information is acquired. It is a constant learning experience and part of the scientific method. Good thing we aren't using the same science, medicine and surgical techniques we used 500 years ago.
So what you're telling us is that Nixon counted the HI votes, delayed nothing, & no one objected. OK.The VP as the leader of the count can delay the count if there's uncertainty, he wouldn't be choosing anything. His role is to ensure the legitimacy of the process.
Hell, Nixon gave Hawaii's electoral votes that had been approved by the State for him, to Kennedy.
Nixon Adds Hawaii's 3 Electoral Votes To Kennedy's Column
On Friday, January 6, 1961, the electoral votes were tallied by roll-call in a joint session of Congress with Vice-President Richard M. Nixon presiding.
The roll-call went smoothly until Hawaii was reached. There were three sets of documents for Hawaii, which finally went to Kennedy after the official recount which had not been completed when the electors met in Honolulu on December 19th.
The tellers tossed that problem into Nixon's lap, and the Vice-President held without opposition that the latest document, dated January 4 and certifying the Kennedy electors, was the one that should be counted.
That made the presidential tally 303 for Kennedy, 219 for Nixon and 15 for Senator Harry F. Byrd of Virginia.
The outgoing Vice-President presided over the joint session under a constitutional provision that requires Congress to canvass the electoral votes. The votes actually were cast on December 19 by the electors of the 50 states.
Hawaii's vote was originally certified for Nixon, who held a 141 vote margin before a recount swung the state to Kennedy by 115 votes.
The point remains that the election didn't follow the Constitution, the discrepancies uncovered since then were unknown at the time. They were unknown because the law wasn't followed, and a delay of the electoral count would've been prudent to verify that we had a legitimate President.
Nixon chose to ignore the electoral vote authorized by the State, and instead used the recount tally to give Kennedy the electoral votes.So what you're telling us is that Nixon counted the HI votes, delayed nothing, & no one objected. OK.