You gotta be the dumbest nut on here. In some species and ecosystems you can watch evolution happen over a few generations. You can see it over the earlier stages of humans. Eventually Our species decided to mostly bypass evolution and use technology instead to adapt to problems. If the makeup of our atmosphere drastically changed, and we managed to survive long enough, our systems would evolve to use the new atmosphere. If Elon ever gets his dream of colonizing Mars we will get to witness some mild evolution as generations are born in the different gravity and radiation levels.
That word doesn't mean what you think it means. Wow, you don't even understand what Darwinian evolution claims to be. You don't know the difference between evolution of species and the generic, bland definition of evolution? You actually believe that the evolution you just described is the same as what Darwin claimed, which is that species added DNA information to itself and became another species? Darwinian evolution isn't just adaptation to environment; it's CHANGING THE DNA.
We can't discuss this if you can't even understand the most rudimentary definitions of terms. And you clearly lack self control because every post of yours involves you launching some sort of insult at me. Can you discuss this without getting personal or using pejoratives?
I also noticed that you have dodged the mathematical aspect of this. You know you can't argue it.
You're waaaay out of your league here.
Amino acids are components of proteins – which are essential to life. The amino acid alanine, for example consists of 13 atoms of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen arranged in a particular structure. Tyrosine is somewhat larger with 20 atoms arranged in a different structure. Experiments or conditions that allow the right elements to mix and provide the requisite energy to initiate reactions can produce such molecules. Some of these experiments – like the famous ones of Miller and Urey – are touted as evidence that the “molecules of life” are easily formed. (That’s not strictly true, but requires a longer discussion.) But amino acids must be combined carefully into proteins to allow functionality in living organisms.
I'll give you a head start though...Evolution says we came from nothing - random formation of molecules into proteins over billions of years. It would be literally mathematically impossible for even
one single protein to form under those conditions - BUT I'LL SPOT YOU FAVORABLE CONDITIONS! And then we'll talk about the math. Fair enough? Yes or no?
By the way, the conditions I'll spot you are these:
Consider just one solitary protein molecule consisting of a particular sequence of 400 amino acids. There are 20 amino acids to choose from for every unit in the sequence. Now let’s consider the following fanciful conditions, all chosen to make it possible to form a single chain of just the right collection of amino acids:
1. A vat or sea of only the 20 left-handed amino acids useful to life is prepared at just the right concentration, temperature, and other physical conditions. (This would be impossible under natural conditions which would produce other amino acids, including the right-handed variety, plus toxic chemicals. Also, natural concentrations in a pre-biotic world would be hopelessly low.)
2. A chain of 400 amino acids is formed. (This is impossible thermodynamically, without the “factory” of a cell for the protein’s manufacture. Each peptide bond requires energy and the presence of water destroys bonds much more quickly than they can be formed under natural conditions.)
3. This single “protein” of 400 amino acids is stable enough to hang around and wait for a gazillion other such proteins, plus sugars, plus nucleic acids, plus large structures of these constituents, etc., in order to be useful at all.
Given the above fanciful conditions, what are the odds against this protein getting the amino acid order correct?