ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Latinos are most definitely not down with a lot of the wokeness , especially if it involves their kids in schools. They are also anti abortion and a great many are sick of the illegal immigrant debacle.
alot of them don't like the illegals being treated better and getting a path to citizenship handed to them, while they worked hard and earned their right to citizenship the legal way. They resent illegals.
 
kids-dancing.gif
 
No appointing about it. Must be confirmed by House AND Senate. Ain't happening at 50-50.

They'd find the votes. Or maybe they can't and it's the only reason they haven't done it. They absolutely want her in the mix.



Lol c'mon. We all know what that actually means. Better post that on Facebook or somewhere else where it's either an echo chamber or people completely incapable of dissecting that very intentional headline
 
You are definitely brain dead. Trade deficit rose 11% year to year and that is a win? you are comedy gold. the trade deficit isn't even a real thing so up or down, doesn't actually matter. We get cheap shit, they get money. We already have tons of money and love cheap shit. win win. Only in Trumps mind is international trade some evil thing even though he has spent decades outsourcing every dumbass product he has launched and then bankrupted.
* KA - BOOM *



Thanks, Joe!
 
They'd find the votes. Or maybe they can't and it's the only reason they haven't done it.
Any Senate Pub that voted to make MO the VP might as well resign. Ain't no maybe about it that they can't find the votes.

I'm somewhat surprised Dims haven't assassinated a Pub Senator to gain easy Senate control.
 
Any Senate Pub that voted to make MO the VP might as well resign. Ain't no maybe about it that they can't find the votes.

I'm somewhat surprised Dims haven't assassinated a Pub Senator to gain easy Senate control.

They floated trying to expell a bunch over Jan 6. They tried 2 or 3 times floating that story to get a public temperature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rupp876
That’s hogwash. You’re trying to separate the events themselves from Trump’s handling of them which is impossible. If a more innocuous politician had made more palliative comments about GF and not handled it like Trump did (gassing protestors for a photo op) who knows how it would have ended up. He poured gas on the resulting fire instead of smothering it and it rose up and burned him. Same with covid denial.
"Gassing protestors for a photo op" is a confirmed lie. If you are as smart as you think you are, then I can only deduce that you knew you were spreading misinformation willingly in order to validate your opinion. Why would you do this? This is no different than the 'good people on both sides' confirmed lie that keeps being spread to this day.
 
If this series of articles has been linked previously in this thread, I apologize.....I believe it's worth sharing again nonetheless. This link takes you to an exhaustive, detailed, and evidence-rich series of articles compiled by Revolver that examines the J6 protest at the Capitol.

BE FOREWARNED: Reading all of the related articles is not for the faint of heart or the easily distracted with regard to both content or length (I'm still working my way through them)!

Kudos to Revolver for doing actual investigative reporting!

 
"Gassing protestors for a photo op" is a confirmed lie. If you are as smart as you think you are, then I can only deduce that you knew you were spreading misinformation willingly in order to validate your opinion. Why would you do this? This is no different than the 'good people on both sides' confirmed lie that keeps being spread to this day.
Both of them happened. Sorry revisionist history guy.

Edit: Here’s a link to a word-for-word transcript of the “both sides” statement if you want to see for yourself.
 
Last edited:
At some point we have to think the inability of the vaccine to slow COVID will negate any mandates. At least in a sane world, it would.
Add in the fact that Merck's therapeutic (ie: cure) is due out soon... what would be the point of a mandate?

A therapeutic that does the same thing as the vaxx (lessens symptoms) renders both the vaxx and a mandate as unnecessary.
 
"Gassing protestors for a photo op" is a confirmed lie. If you are as smart as you think you are, then I can only deduce that you knew you were spreading misinformation willingly in order to validate your opinion. Why would you do this? This is no different than the 'good people on both sides' confirmed lie that keeps being spread to this day.

One, he's not as smart as he thinks he his. Two, every belief they have is based on lies and they are not against propagating those falsehoods.

They even repeat their lies so much, they fully believe them to be actually true.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT