ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
E69AWGaWYAcs0u_
 
Well I’m a known leftist so the whole thread feels the need to argue with me whenever I post. They ignored the voter ID conversation because I said I’d be fine with a provided ID. Nothing to bash there so they went in on the 2nd Amendment comparison someone made. It’s a sports forum, most here just love razzing the ‘enemy’.
This is the political thread. There are threads for each specific sport we care about so... No one ignores the voter ID if you agree we should have it, issue closed. We just simply move on to other issues.
 
Which church? And why do you trust its bureaucracy? The largest and most established church bureaucracy is the Catholic one. And that thing’s just a pillar of efficiency and transparency donchaknow…
You can go through churches how many St whatever hospitals and charitable orgs are there?

You could also go through hundreds, if not thousands, of private organizations that are available.

You could donate to ppl directly too. Heres the thing, doing the latter would be better for all, bc it gives the giver reasons to be grateful and ties the donation directly, which makes the receiver also more grateful, and less "entitled". It also allows the giver to stop if it isnt working. I am clearly only scratching the surface of the benefits. It would take hrs to write them all. Dont be so myopic.

Edit. In fairness, i did say "primarily". I know what i was thinking and trying to be succinct, didnt articulate well. Also, looking at the time of the post, probably shouldve just gone to sleep lol.
 
Last edited:
I never will forget a very smart conservative told me in my youth (when I voted Democrat)...'I'm not against a lot of government programs when I first hear about them. I'm against them cause I know that they will expand 20 times more than they were suppose to and even if they are bad programs they will never die. You can't get rid of them.'
Main reason why I am not concerned about Social Security and Medicare not being available when my generation needs it. No politician has the spine to take away those entitlements. What I am concerned about is how they pay for it because at the rate we are going it’s going to be high taxes and they will find a way to raid retirement accounts to get more money.
 
Comment from that twitter thread is the obvious reality.

I was down on the mall and legitimate rally attendees attempting to peacefully assemble were in shock that it happened. I remarked how surreal it was—reminded me of watching a movie being filmed. It was staged.

There were agent provocateurs and then there were complete idiots that got riled up in the moment. No one asks the real question, why was it allowed to happen?
 


Can any history buffs verify this. @Sawnee Cat ... you were probably around then.
You would think that World War II would have taught some people a few lessons. Thirst for power is a very dangerous thing that can turn some leaders evil. I never would have thought France would go the route of Nazi Germany. Nor would I have ever thought the US would ever consider those tactics either, but here we are.
 
That’s not the point I was getting at. The point was that at that time in the world, slavery was the norm. It wasn’t a pure “let’s enslave all the African because of their skin color” like it’s portrayed in most educational standards. Slavery was the norm if you could afford to own one. It didn’t matter if you were a colonist, free African American, Native American, English citizen, African, or Middle Easterner. The only reason there weren’t more African slave owners than what there were is due to the fact that there were less blacks able to own them. Slavery in the US took people who were already slaves, or POWs that would have been otherwise killed and used them as a commodity. While that doesn’t make it any better, because enslavement of anyone is morally apprehensible and one of the darkest aspects of all civilization, it’s still important to realize the context in which it was used in the world when talking about it. There are more slaves today still than any point in time.
What you say may well be true but is in no way useful when attempting a communist takeover. So I guess that makes you guilty of being a disinformation violator. That of course designates you as a fascist terrorist as well.
 
I have a childhood friend. I let him and his twin brother (rip) go a long time ago. They both got into drugs and gangs. Both had been shot and one shot two people killing one. One was killed in an officer involved shooting. It was justified, he was armed with a revolver that they ordered him to drop. The other one just got released from a ten year prison sentence. I suspect he will either be dead or back in jail at some point. Our families are close. They had plenty of advantages growing up but chose that life. Except for the part of them having advantages, their story is unfortunately pretty common in certain areas throughout the country. There will always be a place in my heart for what once was.

I say all of that to say that while the media does indeed play a significant role in shaping our
memories, a shooting like that at Newtown where small innocent kids were slaughtered in minutes, SHOULD get more attention and SHOULD be burned into my mind more than my two childhood friends. They can’t call the police if someone tried to rob them of their drug stash. They have to take action themselves.

Its a shock to the conscience when people, innocent people who are just going to
School or attending a concert are slaughtered. Perhaps you’re right about the media but I think it SHOULD be that way.
You're missing the big picture as usual. The media ONLY does this so they can politicize it. But they ignore the thousands killed every month because they can't advance the cause du jour.
 
Well I’m a known leftist so the whole thread feels the need to argue with me whenever I post. They ignored the voter ID conversation because I said I’d be fine with a provided ID. Nothing to bash there so they went in on the 2nd Amendment comparison someone made. It’s a sports forum, most here just love razzing the ‘enemy’.
I did not ignore the voter ID conversation, I provided my counter arguments then abandoned the conversation when it went off on that tangent. Yes you are a known leftist, therefore you should fully expect that people on the right will want to debate your opinions when you present them, just as you debate our opinions with your posts. That's the purpose of this forum.
 
Privatize charity to the most local level, primarily to be distributed by the church and its networks, never passing through uncle sam. Americans, when allowed to be, are the most generous ppl on the planet. Pols will not allow it, even though it would help hundreds at each local level
.
There are a whole lot of very good and strong charities that do great work and help a lot of people. More money, food, housing, transportation, etc. could get into the hands through private charities if allowed to operate without too much Government intervention. I do agree there has to be a limited amount of oversight to weed out and prevent the scammers and thiefs operating bunk charities and lining their pockets. But forcing taxpayers to send a substantial chunk of their hard earned dollars to the government to be filtered through 50 layers of bureaucracy before pennies on the dollar are actually spent on government programs to provide money to able bodied people who choose not to work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyCatFan and exemjr
Which church? And why do you trust its bureaucracy? The largest and most established church bureaucracy is the Catholic one. And that thing’s just a pillar of efficiency and transparency donchaknow…
I'll state that in my previous post about charities, I don't think they need to be filtered through a church. there are many good ones that aren't. The WHAS crusade for children that happens every year is a great example. I don't think Habitat for Humanity is run by a church. Both great charities I have donated and given my time to. A lot of churches operate things like Soup kitchens or lunch lines, providing food. Something tangible and helpful that the truly needy gravitate to for sustenance where they are not given free money to go out and spend on booze, drugs and cigarettes. I've worked in Soup Kitchens, I've helped build a couple of Habitat for Humanity homes, I've donated quite a bit to the Crusade for Children.

I'd just like you to answer these simple questions. Do you think the Government knows what's better for the citizens more than the citizens do themselves? Do you think the Democrats truly have the peoples best interest at heart or do they want power? Do you think Government controlling every aspect of our lives is better than people being free to choose their own way?
 
I made this joke the other day, about driving drunk 55 around...the song I mentioned isn't some favorite of mine, it was actually before my time...I don't know why I used it, just trying to be funny. Now I can't get the son of a b-tch out of my head...I actually don't even really like the song, but for two days just been walking around with the lyrics in my head ' just like every cowboy sings a sad sad song'
Well Cowboy, I hope your singing a sad song after this weekend. Though I feel like it will be me doing the singing after the debacles the Reds have been since the break.

Anywho. I'm gonna gloat if things go well, but if they don't, here's your preemptive SHADDUP!!!
 
Well Cowboy, I hope your singing a sad song after this weekend. Though I feel like it will be me doing the singing after the debacles the Reds have been since the break.

Anywho. I'm gonna gloat if things go well, but if they don't, here's your preemptive SHADDUP!!!

Cards just won 3 out of 4 against the Cubs, normally that would be great, but with the way this season is going we managed to f-ck it up...the one game we lost, we gave up 6 runs in the ninth to lose 7-6. Cubs only had 6 hits, but scored 7 runs. You aren't suppose to lose that game.

But reds vs cards this weekend...get ready. Paul Goldschmidt has started hitting...I think we about to b-tch slap you communist reds.
 
They can't help themselves but politicise it, for profit and power, and it's disgusting.

Posted this in 'rona thread, which that complete idiot nightwish "laughed" at like that means anything other than showing everyone not infected with their idiocy just how gullible leftists are.

E6o-Ie-ZZXMAg-Siyg-Copy.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyCatFan and exemjr
I find it interesting that for months, it was really just the Buffalo Bills' Cole Beasley who was publicly against the vaccine. And he was blasted for it, almost on the verge of costing his career if you ask me.

Then, when the NFL comes out yesterday saying you're going to be forced to vax... you got already a dozen players, white and black, who are against it, backing up that stats that there's still 20% of NFL players who don't have the vaccine.

The NFL stepping in it, big time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT