ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Alright so what's your legal argument for banning nuclear arms? The 2nd Amendment clearly states the right to own arms shall not be infringed.
It does NOT clearly state that.

You're funny, you lecture people about commas, but you clearly cannot even copy/paste an easily found Amendment to the Constitution. You're literally the last person on the planet who should be lecturing ANYONE about ANYTHING.

Also, 'alright' is not an acceptable word in Standard English.
 
It does NOT clearly state that.

You're funny, you lecture people about commas, but you clearly cannot even copy/paste an easily found Amendment to the Constitution. You're literally the last person on the planet who should be lecturing ANYONE about ANYTHING.

Also, 'alright' is not an acceptable word in Standard English.
So spell it out then. Why do you not have a constitutional right to bear those arms?
 
E66wqgLWUAAkCGT
 
the article itself says that on average crossings drop 20% in June. Trump did exactly what i said he would. Ramp up the rhetoric and bullshit and wait for the summer slowdown to claim credit for a "miracle" fix. Families not from Mexico won't make the trip when their odds of dying from the heat are 50/50. This fits perfectly into the 30% drop in family units since right now 80% of illegal immigration are non mexicans. When the weather cools off it will spike again. By then Trump will have found some new shiny object to distract his base.
 
They hate us all and they hate this country.

Then they complain about all these Covid variants while opening the door to let it right in. Throw in other things with it like Monkey Pox that are coming from other countries. Probably will have something like a Monkey Pox/Covid-19 hybrid that will eventually kill most of us off in the future.
 
This woman pretended to be conservative for CNN. Her social media page determined that was a lie. 😂










E65sVtEWEAUdtRw




Totally an impartial Republican, guys. This is a doctor who will lie about the most basic shit and yet you’re to trust someone like her? No. Their dogma and agenda are bigger than the truth. Reminds me of the same tactics in Islam where lying to achieve a goal is okay.
 
Last edited:
This woman pretended to be conservative for CNN. Her social media page determined that was a lie. 😂










E65sVtEWEAUdtRw




Totally an impartial Republican, guys. This is a doctor who will lie about the most basic shit and yet you’re to trust someone like her? No. Their dogma and agenda are bigger than the truth. Reminds me of the same tactics in Islam where lying to achieve a goal is okay.

You know that whole charade was completely set up. All his events are. Complete with prearranged questions and scripted answers.

Still he sounds like the dementia patient that he is. It's scary
 
That’s exactly what I said. We don’t have a ton of data and the FDA won’t approve them.
We’re on about month 7 of mainstream introduction of the vaccine. Definitely still in short term.
Last night Biden said likely in 2-3 months (Let the Biden knocking posts begin.). 9-10 months is a whole lot more than 7 to make it long-term, isn't it? Skeptics are really betting it all on a fraying thread. Not much else left though.
 
I don't have the answers in terms of how to keep the mass flow of guns out of the hands of the sinister. I don't think anyone here has the answer either from what I have seen. What I will say is that leaving things as they currently are, is clearly not the answer either. I'm afraid that this will all be left to solve itself. But it will eventually solve itself, and folks may not be happy what that looks like.
It's not hard. Stop & Frisk worked extremely well in NYC. And that was followed by hard sentences 8 lock up. You must be a kid to not remember those days.

Pansy a$$es today more worried about being called racist than they are with helping people, particularly black people. And then DA's elect district attorneys who won't lock up & prosecute. Voting against that crap; i.e., against Dims, particularly Soros-funded Dims, would stop that sh!t.

So decide whether you prefer using the tried & true or whining that there's nothing that can be done. Oh yea, strict control of the border with a wall would help a lot too.
 
Last edited:
*When the State tells you it’s safe to go to Home Depot to buy a sponge but dangerous to go and buy a flower, it’s not about your health.

*When the State shuts down millions of private businesses but doesn’t lay off a single government employee, it’s not about your health.

*When the State bans dentists because its unsafe, but deems an abortion visit is safe, it’s not about your health.

*When the State prevents you from buying cucumber seeds because it’s dangerous, but allows personal lottery ticket sales, it’s not about your health.

*When the State tells you it’s dangerous to go golf alone, fish alone or be in a motor boat alone, but the Governor can get his stage make-up done, and hair done for 5 TV appearances a week, it’s not about your health.

*When the state puts you IN a jail cell for walking in a park with your child because it’s too dangerous but lets criminals OUT of jail cells for their health- It’s not about YOUR health!

*When the state tells you it’s too dangerous to get treated by a doctor for chiropractic or physical therapy treatments yet deems a liquor store essential- It’s not about your health!

* When the state tells you, you can't travel without having a negative virus test yet transports untested, likely covid infected illegal immigrants into the interior of the country- It's not about your health!

*When the State lets you go to the grocery store or hardware store but is demanding mail-in voting, ITS NOT ABOUT YOUR HEALTH. WAKE UP PEOPLE — If you think this is all about your health you’re mistaken! Please open your eyes! Stop being lead like blind sheep.
 
You're arguing a theory, not anything practical. As usual, you have been painted into a corner and are trying to lash out with straw men. Nukes aren't practical for self defense, nor are they able to be deployed without harming innocents.
Yes legal theory, which is where these rights come from. I don’t see anything in the 2nd Amendment about harming innocents. I’ll ask again. Why do you not have a constitutional right to bear those arms?
 
It's not hard. Stop & Frisk worked extremely well in NYC. And that was followed by hard sentences 8 lock up. You must be a kid to not remember those days.

Pansy a$$es today more worried about being called racist than they are with helping people, particularly black people. And then DA's elect district attorneys who won't lock up & prosecute. Voting against that crap; i.e., against Dims, particularly Soros-funded Dims, would stop that sh!t.

So decide whether you prefer using the tried & true or whining that there's nothing that can be done. Oh yea, strict control of the border with a wall would help a lot too.
I’m fine with stop and frisk but this problem is far bigger than New York and every so often we still have soft targets being targeted like schools, concerts, movie theaters, work and I assume sporting events will happen eventually. These events are nearly as frequent as your inner city violence using guns but when those events do happen, they are devastating.
 
Yes legal theory, which is where these rights come from. I don’t see anything in the 2nd Amendment about harming innocents. I’ll ask again. Why do you not have a constitutional right to bear those arms?
I'm not going to engage with your ham-fisted attempt to derail serious discussion with wild stabs because you lost the argument. You're fun to bat around because you're stupid, but now you're just beclowning yourself because you actually think you're smart.

You were found wanting because you couldn't even QUOTE the 2nd Amendment properly, let alone discuss it, and now you want to demand that I answer something? You're a joke.
 
I’m fine with stop and frisk but this problem is far bigger than New York and every so often we still have soft targets being targeted like schools, concerts, movie theaters, work and I assume sporting events will happen eventually. These events are nearly as frequent as your inner city violence using guns but when those events do happen, they are devastating.
Like it can only be done in NYC? LOL. And you have to complain about the other 10% of the problem? No pleasing you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaizer Sosay
I’m fine with stop and frisk but this problem is far bigger than New York and every so often we still have soft targets being targeted like schools, concerts, movie theaters, work and I assume sporting events will happen eventually. These events are nearly as frequent as your inner city violence using guns but when those events do happen, they are devastating.
You know what? Lots of things are devastating. Economic collapses caused by inept government in bed with greedy banks is devastating. Illegal aliens swarming our border and swamping/bankrupting our society is devastating. Useless wars overseas are devastating. Massive income taxes are devastating. Lack of trust in federal law enforcement due to conspiracies and overreach are devastating. Illegals murdering American citizens because the government won't deport them is devastating. Black on black crime in Chicago is devastating (dozens murdered every weekend).

But yeah, wring your hands and focus on the exception rather than the rule.
 
Like it can only be done in NYC? LOL. And you have to complain about the other 10% of the problem? No pleasing you.

lol well I am only familiar with New York I’m not familiar with the laws in other places. So I didn’t want to speak on it but basically I agree with you. Yes, I think it’s those 10% incidents that have the lasting effect. People will always remember Columbine, Newtown, Va Tech, Vegas and what I’m saying is even if you decrease inner city violence but incidents like those continue to happen, it’s not about what I want but the youth will not stand for it and we will see the fruits of that when they get older.
 
Alright so what's your legal argument for banning nuclear arms? The 2nd Amendment clearly states the right to own arms shall not be infringed.
Has a private citizen ever tried to own nuclear arms, even more specifically under the reasoning of protecting themselves from their own govt? Thus this is a nonsensical slippery slope akin to the ppl that said gay marriage shouldn't be legal bc eventually ppl would marry their dogs.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT