Wow, very sorry for your loss, our thoughts are with you and your family my friend.Unfortunately earlier today I learned that my brother has passed away. Very sad and tough situation.
Wow, very sorry for your loss, our thoughts are with you and your family my friend.Unfortunately earlier today I learned that my brother has passed away. Very sad and tough situation.
She looks like a bitter old version of Patton Oswald.She looks like she was on the Court when the law was passed; i.e., first-hand information & now dememtia.
They refuse to see the problem for what it really is. The VAST majority of those tent cities are populated by drug addicts who CHOOSE to be there. These aren’t people down on their luck, looking for housing. They are drug addicted grifters. They are there because the system and government in those cities allow and support it. If you put them in housing, they will destroy the housing, they forced hotels into taking in some of these derelicts during Covid last year and they destroyed the rooms. These cities condone their behavior and ignore the root of the problem.The people of CA deserve this. They elected them.
"\Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg has proposed a "right to housing" as the California homeless crisis continues to grow more severe.
The state has around 161,000 people struggling with homelessness, and the state’s leadership is coming up short with answers. As the most populous state, California has the highest number of homeless people, according to government statistics: The state also boasts the fourth-highest rate of homeless per capita in the U.S.
Steinberg announced a plan Wednesday, during his State of the City address, that he believes will help his city and the state at large to better tackle the crisis: A "right to housing" along with an "obligation" for homeless people to accept shelter when offered."
The cost is down from LAST YEAR when everyone was in a panic and some staples were missing from the shelves? Hell we’re we even allowed to have a picnic last year?
So will I get the same warning if Antifa or BLM folks start pushing their views at me? Just askin’
I can see that. If they keep pushing these divisive ideologies and continue denigrating the whites, they are only hurting opportunities that blacks and POC might have for jobs and advancement. The best white ally a minority can have is a business owner who will offer minorities jobs and opportunities for advancement. Not these Antifa ass clowns out in the streets destroying the businesses that would provide those opportunities.Progressives: let's be like Europe
Places in europe:
Progressives: no I meant other stuff
It’s pure propaganda straight from the Whitehouse.I may be wrong, but I don't think so, but everything that they show on that table costs me more than a year ago.
Six months ago. Four months ago.
Yet Trump supporters are still the greatest terroristic threat.Trump had designated them as a foreign terrorists group, much to the dislike of the left and media.
The sun is racist, confirmed. Not to mention at the same time...ppl like Ed here, who lives in Massachusetts, wants to tell southerners in places like Louisiana they're being selfish and shouldn't turn their thermostats down in the summer bc of the climate. But now, why not, they just can't resist tying yet something else to race.
They must be really concerned about losing a % of this demographic
Hell, the wooden picnic table price is up three fold since last year.It’s pure propaganda straight from the Whitehouse.
Yes, he doesShe looks like she was on the Court when the law was passed; i.e., first-hand information & now dememtia.
You just wrote a rudimentary indictment of a capital based system and somehow came to the conclusion that it was good. If person A has 1 mil to invest and person B only 1k and both get their 10% all as you said, person A makes 100k and person B 100$. Person A and B did exactly the same thing but person A makes a thousand times more for absolutely no reason. Why should person A get a thousand times more for the exact same activity as person B?True.
BTW, his (assuming) argument that "the gap between the rich and the poor grew" is a naive, childish, almost 4th grade position. And it tells us that he (assuming) is either extremely dishonest, or has no clue regarding finances, or even math.
Let's use some basic math to illustrate WHY the gap grows under any administration and why it is a good thing.
1) Let's say ... two people decided to invest some money. For simplicity, let's say one person invested 1,000,000 and the other invested 1,000. For the liberals, the difference is $999,000. Let's say, for argument's sake, that they both earned THE SAME RATE OF RETURN, or 10% because we want to be FAIR and if they get the same rate of return, that would be fair, right? (More on that assumption in a second.) So, and we just agreed the rate of return is FAIR ... then the first person will have $1,100,000 after one year and the second person will have $1,100, which is a delta of $1,098,900. What?!? The gap between the rich and poor grew larger?!? Oh, the horror!!
1a) Let's tilt the scales in favor of the poor person (that is what you libs wet dream about, right??). Let's give them 20% and keep the rich person at 10%. The gap still grows ($1,098,800 ... still higher than $999.000).
2) Now, the ROR in part 1 was 10% for both the "rich" person and the "poor" person. Now, pretty much anywhere you go, when you have more money in any investment, the bank or institution will reward you with better returns. IOW, the rich person would likely earn more than 10% (on average) and the poor person would only make 10%. Further, the poor person likely does not make good financial choices (which is partly why they are poor in the first place), so they may actually get less than 10% in reality. This would drive the annual difference EVEN HIGHER. Let's go one step further down the rabbit trail: once people learn how to make money (assuming the rich person saved their money over time), then they know HOW to make money. While the poor person may still be "coddled" and hasn't figured out how to build wealth yet. But, whatever, keep the 10% for both just to keep it simple.
3) Finally, one thing the liberal "analysis" doesn't account for is new people in the equation. For example, let's say when someone is 22, they only have the $1,000 from part 1. I haven't done the study, but I suspect that someone NEW turns 22 EVERY SINGLE day. So ... there is a new person at $1,000 every year! What does that mean? Going back to example 1), the "rich" person has $1,100,000 and the "poor" person has $1,000 (because they are new to the sample). The gap, then, is actually larger at $1,099,000. The gap grew again? What?!?
So, the gap grows every year and that is a GOOD THING. The only thing that would change the gap from growing is 1) no one can make any money ... which helps no one (communism), 2) the market totally collapses ... which helps no one (socialism), or 3) two poor people make a law and take, by force, from the rich person (democracy). Thank God for the Republic.
Looks like someone needs to be "coddled" even more...
You just wrote a rudimentary indictment of a capital based system and somehow came to the conclusion that it was good. If person A has 1 mil to invest and person B only 1k and both get their 10% all as you said, person A makes 100k and person B 100$. Person A and B did exactly the same thing but person A makes a thousand times more for absolutely no reason. Why should person A get a thousand times more for the exact same activity as person B?
Having supplies of Budweiser, Miller and the like being scarce is a GOOD problem to have. For one it helps the sales of the local craft brewers. Two, it teaches people there’s vastly superior options available.Ok, this is getting serious now!
![]()
Some Louisville bars say certain beers are getting hard to find
Some local bar owners and managers say it's been tough getting certain brands of beer back in stock.www.wdrb.com
Perfect example of Libs moving the goalposts. This is a crock of bullshit that third world countries pull.Crooked , cheating mother fockers......
California Democrats change Gavin Newsom recall rules; GOP ...
Gross.Tofu and tempeh are still the same price.
Because person A risked 1000 times more money. Person A had more skin in the game.You just wrote a rudimentary indictment of a capital based system and somehow came to the conclusion that it was good. If person A has 1 mil to invest and person B only 1k and both get their 10% all as you said, person A makes 100k and person B 100$. Person A and B did exactly the same thing but person A makes a thousand times more for absolutely no reason. Why should person A get a thousand times more for the exact same activity as person B?
After today's SC rulings Trump should and probably will run in 2024. Its early still but all indications point to the democrats having a much harder time cheating. At least not on a wide scale like in 2020.
So law abiding gun owners are “compensating” the city fir gun violence? What kind of backasswards legislation is this nonsense.
You just wrote a rudimentary indictment of a capital based system and somehow came to the conclusion that it was good. If person A has 1 mil to invest and person B only 1k and both get their 10% all as you said, person A makes 100k and person B 100$. Person A and B did exactly the same thing but person A makes a thousand times more for absolutely no reason. Why should person A get a thousand times more for the exact same activity as person B?
Because person A risked 1000 times more money. Person A had more skin in the game.
Sorry for your loss. Prayers sent.Unfortunately earlier today I learned that my brother has passed away. Very sad and tough situation.
Because they start at a different place. Math. I know its hard, but hang in there.You just wrote a rudimentary indictment of a capital based system and somehow came to the conclusion that it was good. If person A has 1 mil to invest and person B only 1k and both get their 10% all as you said, person A makes 100k and person B 100$. Person A and B did exactly the same thing but person A makes a thousand times more for absolutely no reason. Why should person A get a thousand times more for the exact same activity as person B?
I'm not a know it all. Sometimes I'm right and sometimes I'm wrong. I am SURE I will say or post something to piss you or others offScrew, my condolences to you and your family.
It’s called the heat island effect and yes it affects minorities disproportionately, because due to Democrat policies such as welfare and public housing, minorities generally live in the urban areas. So who is at fault for the sun being racist?The sun is racist, confirmed. Not to mention at the same time...ppl like Ed here, who lives in Massachusetts, wants to tell southerners in places like Louisiana they're being selfish and shouldn't turn their thermostats down in the summer bc of the climate. But now, why not, they just can't resist tying yet something else to race.
They must be really concerned about losing a % of this demographic
If one has 1m and the other 1k they’re both risking the same thing, what they’ve got. They risk their savings, going back to their 9 to 5s. In fact in practical terms it’s often much riskier for the person with 1k. Because that 1k could be going to rent, food, necessities. When you have 1m you don’t have those same visceral concerns.Because person A risked 1000 times more money. Person A had more skin in the game.
If one has 1m and the other 1k they’re both risking the same thing, what they’ve got. They risk their savings, going back to their 9 to 5s. In fact in practical terms it’s often much riskier for the person with 1k. Because that 1k could be going to rent, food, necessities. When you have 1m you don’t have those same visceral concerns.
Who is at fault? Trump, of course.It’s called the heat island effect and yes it affects minorities disproportionately, because due to Democrat policies such as welfare and public housing, minorities generally live in the urban areas. So who is at fault for the sun being racist?
Ok... adjust my math.Can't do that. See Amendment 22. Max a prez can serve is 9 years, 364 days.
You have to be an absolute pathetic gaf to wear a mask in a profile pic.The sun is racist, confirmed. Not to mention at the same time...ppl like Ed here, who lives in Massachusetts, wants to tell southerners in places like Louisiana they're being selfish and shouldn't turn their thermostats down in the summer bc of the climate. But now, why not, they just can't resist tying yet something else to race.
They must be really concerned about losing a % of this demographic
Sorry man. Prayers for you and your family.Unfortunately earlier today I learned that my brother has passed away. Very sad and tough situation.
The sun is racist, confirmed. Not to mention at the same time...ppl like Ed here, who lives in Massachusetts, wants to tell southerners in places like Louisiana they're being selfish and shouldn't turn their thermostats down in the summer bc of the climate. But now, why not, they just can't resist tying yet something else to race.
They must be really concerned about losing a % of this demographic
You have to be an absolute pathetic gaf to wear a mask in a profile pic.
It’s called the heat island effect and yes it affects minorities disproportionately, because due to Democrat policies such as welfare and public housing, minorities generally live in the urban areas. So who is at fault for the sun being racist?
And…it’s still a bigger financial risk for person A. Theyre investing a larger portion into the stock.If one has 1m and the other 1k they’re both risking the same thing, what they’ve got. They risk their savings, going back to their 9 to 5s. In fact in practical terms it’s often much riskier for the person with 1k. Because that 1k could be going to rent, food, necessities. When you have 1m you don’t have those same visceral concerns.