What specifically about Derrick Rose leads you to believe he didn't take his test? Handwriting experts couldn't even prove it.What specifically about Duval leads you to believe he needed extra assistance to become eligible?
What specifically about Derrick Rose leads you to believe he didn't take his test? Handwriting experts couldn't even prove it.What specifically about Duval leads you to believe he needed extra assistance to become eligible?
Sounds like Duke isn't quite the Ivy they want to pretend to be.The NCAA requirements are also very low.
That’s all in your head. Don’t let it get to you.
What specifically about Derrick Rose leads you to believe he didn't take his test? Handwriting experts couldn't even prove it.
What specifically about Derrick Rose leads you to believe he didn't take his test? Handwriting experts couldn't even prove it.
In algebra all he had to learn wasObviously easy, looks like Bagley took 2 Algebra 1 and above classes and a Latin class and an English class in the summer. Rhodes scholars would have issue with that schedule
I'm not arguing assumptions. I'm arguing stone cold proof. If you're going to let the Cheats off the hook because of a technicality when the writing is basically on the wall, you're going against the precedent you set with Rose/Memphis. I get that the situations are day/night, but you can't rule based on assumption and then require proof/letter of the law for others.Pretty sure the handwriting guy said while he couldn't prove it, he strongly believed it was someone else. That and the fact that Rose's score went up significantly, is pretty good evidence someone else took it. That doesn't mean Cal had anything to do with it of course.
I'm not arguing assumptions. I'm arguing stone cold proof. If you're going to let the Cheats off the hook because of a technicality when the writing is basically on the wall, you're going against the precedent you set with Rose/Memphis. I get that the situations are day/night, but you can't rule based on assumption and then require proof/letter of the law for others.
For that matter, Lance Thomas/Duke. They didn't punish because he wouldn't cooperate. Derrick Rose didn't cooperate either. Totally different outcome. The NCAA blatantly shows favoritism towards some while crucifying others.
None with Thomas either,he bought a load of jewelry he couldn't afford without help.Magettee took payments,no doubt.What happened to Duke because of those incidents,I can't seem to recall?There was no assumption with Rose... the testing board invalidated his score. Without that score he was ineligible. There was no choice or decision for the NCAA to make.
None with Thomas either,he bought a load of jewelry he couldn't afford without help.Magettee took payments,no doubt.What happened to Duke because of those incidents,I can't seem to recall?
Without even a shred of evidence. It's too bad nobody would ever put a Duke player through such scrutiny. K and the NCAA would never allow it. There's such a double standard and it's obvious to everybody but Duke fans.There was no assumption with Rose... the testing board invalidated his score. Without that score he was ineligible. There was no choice or decision for the NCAA to make.
That doesn't matter. He got a loan, which is an impermissible benefit.You’re assuming Thomas couldn’t afford the jewelry
Without even a shred of evidence. It's too bad nobody would ever put a Duke player through such scrutiny. K and the NCAA would never allow it. There's such a double standard and it's obvious to everybody but Duke fans.
That doesn't matter. He got a loan, which is an impermissible benefit.
You folks must get a hell of a discount as frequent customers of the crowd sourcing business platform.You’re assuming Thomas couldn’t afford the jewelry... there was no outside governing body that determined that. It’s not that hard to understand.
The Maggette incident Duke probably should have been punished but we crowd sourced a large payment to the NCAA to avoid sanctions and it worked.
Gathering as much info to hide and form a strategy.
You just crowd source it and buy the favoritism you need at the time.So now the testing board has Duke favoritism too?
Gets better every yearYou folks must get a hell of a discount as frequent customers of the crowd sourcing business platform.
You’re assuming Thomas couldn’t afford the jewelry... there was no outside governing body that determined that. It’s not that hard to understand.
The Maggette incident Duke probably should have been punished but we crowd sourced a large payment to the NCAA to avoid sanctions and it worked.
Sure sounds like a loan to meYea this is not true
Not surprised you missed the point. They targeted Calipari. They've always targeted him. Even former NCAA employees have said this much.So now the testing board has Duke favoritism too?
Don't know about you but I've had more fun in this thread than a old rat in a cheese factoryGets better every year
Sure sounds like a loan to me
Thomas, currently in the NBA, had his story/this case go public after jewelry that he was afforded back in December 2009 still hadn't been paid off.
Link
Not surprised you missed the point. They targeted Calipari. They've always targeted him. Even former NCAA employees have said this much.
More so that I don’t think the NCAA wants to pin anyone down... especially any major Nike school.
You’re assuming Thomas couldn’t afford the jewelry... there was no outside governing body that determined that. It’s not that hard to understand.
That doesn't matter. He got a loan, which is an impermissible benefit.
Yea this is not true
He bought it on credit based on his future professional earnings.Sure sounds like a loan to me
Thomas, currently in the NBA, had his story/this case go public after jewelry that he was afforded back in December 2009 still hadn't been paid off.
Link
.I think Dukes compliance department it just really good and filling out all the necessary paperwork.
So deny and spend lots of your money on good attorneys? I had the opportunity to go to law school, but a knack for software and a burgeoning love of the Rockies took me down a different path. Thankfully. Any x girlfriend will tell you I hate to argue. I would have made a lousy lawyer. But I could twiddle bits.The difference between UNC and almost all other schools who get punished is simply this. Those schools typically have admitted to infractions and / or agreed with the NCAA on the underlying facts. That’s really it.
You have to keep in mind that the enforcement process was intentionally designed by the universities to limit the NCAA’s power. So it’s a collaborative process where the NCAA and school essentially have to agree on the facts to be considered. The downside to that approach is that you end up with a system where the people who cooperate quite often get harsher sentences than the people who fight the NCAA.
Totally get your frustration though. UNC is the biggest fraud in the history of college athletics and got off scot free. Shouldn’t have happened.
He bought it on credit based on his future professional earnings.
Impermissible. Maybe one of the easiest cases ever. Yet, nothing.
Have you ever taken a foreign language? Algebra?No they wouldn’t.
That’s an assumption on your part.
Which part? The credit was based on future pro earnings? It was $75k of jewelry. Let's go find the same jeweler and see if he will extend the same to a math major.
He settled the case. So he owed the money.
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that a college student with NO JOBBY JOB can't afford a 70k loan. It was absolutely lent based on future potential earnings. If you're going to post here, stop with the bullshit. You're worse than a UNC fan who still touts the Carolina Way.That’s an assumption on your part.
Probably based on the down payment and a good credit score. Thomas had pretty much zero pro potential at that point. But congrats to him for working hard and sticking in the league as long as he has.
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that a college student with NO JOBBY JOB can't afford a 70k loan. It was absolutely lent based on future potential earnings. If you're going to post here, stop with the bullshit. You're worse than a UNC fan who still touts the Carolina Way.
LMAO good credit score. You realize how they determine a credit score? Combination of credit history, income sources, and existing credit.
A college freshman has none of those. Not for 75k. Not without factoring potential professional earnings.
Now who's making the assumptions?
This was one of the easiest enforcement cases of all time. Yet the NCAA buried their heads in the sand
You are making assumptions. You don’t have any evidence that he was given a loan based off of future earning potential.