My goodness. God bless those officers.
My goodness. God bless those officers.
You really think that 13 year olds, with all the other shit they have going on(particularly girls) should be learning about the darkest time in our country? I don't have kids but I can tell you don't either.Good lord. Yes, she should be taught that. Yes, Americans need to feel those negative feelings when learning about the history of our country. Everyone should be taught an accurate history of the history and founding of this country and they can come to their own determination of whether the country is as good as is often claimed.
Heroes. Thankless job.My goodness. God bless those officers.
Yes.You really think that 13 year olds, with all the other shit they have going on(particularly girls) should be learning about the darkest time in our country?
Generally speaking, the longer the barrel, the more accurate the shot. That makes a rifle more accurate for most people.Military say the AR is easier to successfully shoot people than a handgun for the average person.
I keep forgetting that you are in a running club/group so you are abreast on all topics.Serious question --> where did YOU go wrong, UK_Dallas?
- parents?
- school system?
- observed a drag show as a child?
Do you have kids? It wasn't in regards to that. I was thinking boyfriends and other social issues my niece is dealing with. We see where your head is though.Yes.
And adding in the "(particularly girls)" is a bit gross here. "Oh my we can't give girls too much to think about, they already have their women's troubles to worry about"
Zero chance of implementing a system where people have to regularly register to keep their firearms. It would be impossible to enforce, lead to multiple situations of attempts at enforcement leading to shootouts, and beyond that it wouldn't even be considered constitutional.I simply said a lot can happen in 5 years no more no less. The idea has merits but a 5 year window is way too long when mental health is involved. Maybe it could be 2 years for certain purchases. Every single time for others. In my opinion, the checks should be every time you purchase since at any point something could set you off. I also think there should be mandatory retesting after the purchase. Maybe that’s every 5 years.
My dad had a set of WW2 Encyclopedias that I started looking at early on. Some very graphic concentration camp pictures. Feel the same way as you.
I think you’re the one who needs to go back to school because you’re coming off as by far the least educated person in this entire thread.You really think that 13 year olds, with all the other shit they have going on(particularly girls) should be learning about the darkest time in our country? I don't have kids but I can tell you don't either.
You missed the gist of what I was saying, I am NOT saying they are doing it for fame.I don't want to discount what you're saying, but at least from my perspective, I am not sure that public shame will change the trajectory. I think that works only if you assume the people who commit these acts are motivated by fame and given that they almost always get killed, shame isn't a problem they have to worry about.
Good for you. As we've seen the Germans can't be trusted.I was being sarcastic
The real question is whether Paduke was being sarcastic when he asked someone if they had kids.I was being sarcastic
Well tell me where I'm wrong then genius.I think you’re the one who needs to go back to school because you’re coming off as by far the least educated person in this entire thread.
You might want to just sit this one out. I'm generally on your side of this debate and your responses range from "makes no sense" to "damages your argument".Well tell me where I'm wrong then genius.
Do you have stats that our education system is not a contributing factor in the mental health of children and young adults?
Can’t it be both? It simply has to be both. That’s obvious to anyone who doesn’t have their head in the sand at least. There are way too many dangerous weapons available and they’re way too easy to get. There’s also a massive mental health issue. So why would it make sense to make guns so easy to get in a country with so many mentally ill people in it? The problem is that one side says it’s only guns (not true) and the other will say it’s anything but guns (not true and mostly a way to deflect from the whole issue). Common sense says it’s both.Once again here we are with people quibbling over guns when the issue is mental health. Good people with guns are not a problem in this country, or any country. It is merely a tool. You want to address the problem, then go to the source of it. Warped minds and twisted ideologies. This country has a mental health crisis and it needs to be addressed head on. No sane, rational person experiences some sort of hardship in life and comes to the conclusion the solution is to shoot up a bunch of people.
Fair enough. Not gonna lie though. Seeing those assignments really pissed me off, as well as her parents and many others.You might want to just sit this one out. I'm generally on your side of this debate and your responses range from "makes no sense" to "damages your argument".
Youre barking up the wrong tree. I dont own any guns. Republicans are 100% in favor of passing mental health legislation and common sense gun laws. If Democrats would stop trying to tack on pork barrel projects or legislation they know Pubs will never agree to like they did with this last bill, itd get passed. The problem is the left has shown time and again that if you give them an inch they will take a mile. It's not right wing 2A guys shooting these places up. If you'd admit that is a problem for time immemorial, take some ownership of it, and why we can't sit down at the table to pass common sense legislation, I'd at least respect you and others on here.Can’t it be both? It simply has to be both. That’s obvious to anyone who doesn’t have their head in the sand at least. There are way too many dangerous weapons available and they’re way too easy to get. There’s also a massive mental health issue. So why would it make sense to make guns so easy to get in a country with so many mentally ill people in it? The problem is that one side says it’s only guns (not true) and the other will say it’s anything but guns (not true and mostly a way to deflect from the whole issue). Common sense says it’s both.
The problem is that (a) republicans say it’s mental health and then never agree to fund it and (b) once you start making it difficult to get guns and add common sense measures, you cry that your rights are being infringed on. So since that’s the case, just stop saying it’s mental health and quit BSing everyone. You’re not budging on guns, just admit it. Even if the other side moves, you won’t. Admit that children being ripped to pieces is just an unfortunate side effect to being allowed to have whatever gun you want. At least I would respect you and the others on here for being honest.
You're getting a little ganged up on but there is certainly worth in the point you are raising. There absolutely is a whole lot wrong with our public school system and the repercussions for what has gone on are unknown at this point, so you raising concern is 100% legitimate as we just don't know yet what all these changes are doing to our youth.Fair enough. Not gonna lie though. Seeing those assignments really pissed me off, as well as her parents and many others.
I'll get back to my main point - something is seriously effed up when young people hate this country at the rate they do, which is part of the mental issues IMO. The education system is a contributing factor whether it is what they are teaching or what they aren't.
Show me one bill put forth by Republicans at the state or federal level that does just this. To my knowledge, the last time this was pushed at the federal level every single House republican voted against it. Greg Abbott cut mental health services in Texas and then started carrying on about mental health after Uvalde.Republicans are 100% in favor of passing mental health legislation
I like how you omitted the rest of my statement explaining exactly why they didnt.Show me one bill put forth by Republicans at the state or federal level that does just this. To my knowledge, the last time this was pushed at the federal level every single House republican voted against it. Greg Abbott cut mental health services in Texas and then started carrying on about mental health after Uvalde.
I just don't buy this claim at all.
Brave men taking out a coward.
Thank you. Happy that I’m not alone in seeing that.You're getting a little ganged up on but there is certainly worth in the point you are raising. There absolutely is a whole lot wrong with our public school system and the repercussions for what has gone on are unknown at this point, so you raising concern is 100% legitimate as we just don't know yet what all these changes are doing to our youth.
I know 100% that if I had a young school age kids that I would home school them. I am that certain that something is tragically wrong with our schools. Thankfully mine are grown.
So maybe the tie-in isn't direct enough in this thread for what just happened, but that doesn't mean that you are not bringing anything to the discussion despite the piling on. The remark about you appearing to be the least educated person in this thread was a low blow and little more than spiteful hogwash.
Read the thread assow.
Has it ever occurred to you that young adults are learning accurate history about our country and its past and present issues and forming these opinions on their own?The point is - these kids/young adults are being told at some point, likely college but some high school that the United States is not a good country and that sticks with them. If they are also hearing that at home it only exacerbates that thought.
Asking someone to prove a negative is not exactly a stellar debate technique. You’re simply throwing out an opinion and saying, “prove me wrong.” How about doing a little Googling to back up your opinion with facts? I practically guarantee you’ll find nothing research based connecting school curriculum/educators to young adults/children hating America. It’s just wishful thinking because of your political views and exposure to conservative media.Well tell me where I'm wrong then genius.
Do you have stats that our education system is not a contributing factor in the mental health of children and young adults?
Local news reported the ONB CEO was in route after the shooting took place.Heard from a banker friend that the President of ONB was delayed by traffic and was in the parking lot when the shooting began. He too was supposed to be in the meeting.
And apparently learning about that causes mental illness.Just to be clear: UK_Dallas doesn’t think teenage girls should learn about slavery because they have more important issues in their lives, like boyfriends.
This freaking guy.![]()
For the record - is that 100% accurate, mostly accurate or kind of accurate?Has it ever occurred to you that young adults are learning accurate history about our country and its past and present issues and forming these opinions on their own?
My god, the belief that high school and colleges are these horrible places grooming and warping minds to believe American is a crap country is really astounding.
More accurate than your claim that high school and colleges are telling kids to hate America and learning about slavery is causing mental illness.For the record - is that 100% accurate, mostly accurate or kind of accurate?
Like his overlords, there is no bottom for that guy.Putting people in jail for crimes that they did not commit just so that it’s not as hard for you to get the gun that you like is quite literally the most idiotic and unserious thing that I’ve ever heard.
Briefly:
1. ARs are probably the most ubiquitous firearm in America. There are millions and millions of them. Banning them would do nothing to stop the supply for at least a decade.
2. The VAST majority of gun murders (including mass shootings) are committed with handguns. Admittedly, ARs appear to being increasingly used in mass shootings that are designed to capture the public's attention. Even though those types of shootings seem incredibly common due to the media attention, they thankfully are not.
The vast majority of mass shootings are drug related and committed with a handgun. Banning ARs would just be window dressing and have almost no measurable effect to reduce gun violence.
It would be the same WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING! mentality that led to all kinds of dumbass government abuse during COVID.
3. The AR platform is an incredibly versatile rifle. It has near limitless configurations. People use them for almost every conceivable use -- legal and illegal.
There are so many variations that defining what you mean by "AR" in order to ban that is basically impossible. (Google "featureless rifle California" if you want to see an example of the difficulty involved.)
4. As rudd said, most of what people object to about the AR are cosmetic details. It is a semi-automatic rifle that fires a relatively weak rifle round. Other than 22 long rifle, nearly every rifle is utterly devastating to mammals. In fact, that's the entire point.
By comparison, an AR is much more deadly than a handgun but much less deadly than many other rifles that no one believes should be banned.
Frankly, we should be glad that shotguns are not more popular with mass shooters because a generic pump action shotgun would cause much more carnage in your typical spree shooting at close quarters than an AR.
5. The federal assault weapons ban that was in effect in the 90s has caused many people (and many more people than will publicly admit it) to stockpile ARs, magazines, etc in case it is ever reinstated. That ban was also associated in many people's minds with the federal government tyranny in the 90s like Waco and Ruby Ridge.
Trying to reinstate the ban could cause much more bloodshed in this country than currently exists.