At Clemson.
Wake Forest had EIGHT turnovers in their game against Louisville. that's definitely a recipe for disaster. They gave up 35 points in the third quarter. Louisville has some athletes, but we've managed to make Cunningham look like Chopped Liver when he faces us. Hope that trend continues. hoping his, what is it now, about 6th try against us? (Ok, just seems that way)
On the flip side I could say the same thing about UK & Levis.
Their Schedule is ranked better than ours. How do people not realize this when we pound on our SEC badge. Geez.
9 teams on our schedule either have been or are currently ranked. Our next two games are against #12 Clemson & #16 NC State.
I get it . I get sick of our fans acting like we are better than everyone because of our confernce affiliation. It gets very old especially when we dont show up for our ranked oponents. We are still going to beat your asses
Early in the season I thought we would beat UL like a drum. Your statistics make a point but the ACC is awful except for Clemson and while the Wake Forest game was a good win their turnovers were just crazy. Plus, it was a UL home game and set up pretty well for them. ‘If’ UL beats Clemson I will be way more concerned but I still think UK at home beats UL again.
I was confident in a Louisville win until some news that hasn’t been made public started to leak out last night about a injury to a key offensive player. So now I am going to see how the next two games go before I predict a win vs UK.
🙄, you realize what a joke college football schedule rankings are? 75% of your games are in conference, and 50-75% if your out of conference games are cupcakes. There is no comparison of an SEC schedule vs an ACC schedule, its been proven year after year after year. UofL fans were making similar claims last year, talked themselves into having a chance and we see what happened.
Yea, you wouldnt be saying that if our schedule was ranked higher. PLus, it makes no difference when we dont beat the good teams on our schedule
Playing in the ACC this year inflates a lot of numbers. Fools gold.
No, get this - I actually watch football games and have been doing so for decades at this point. P5 dont mean jack to me, SEC is clearly the top of P5 and ACC is clearly the bottom. UNC is currently 8-1 and undefeated in the ACC, they play Missouri on a neutral field the game is a toss up.
Ive never looked at a schedule rating once in my life, literally means nothing. All I need is the verified history of the SEC being far superior to the ACC in every regard for football.
Sorry but just because they have teams on their schedule with undeserving rankings does not make their schedule tougher than ours. I say this knowing we never deserved our top 10 ranking we had earlier this year.
I know, I mean Math is a subjective thing isnt it because that is how these rankings work? Until we beat "the good teams on our schedule" its irrelevant
Correct and since his return UK averages about 137 yards per game which would put UK around 80th. On the flip side Louisville is averaging about 202 rush yards per game but UK is only giving up about 120 per game. Both teams are giving up about 20pts roughly per game so this could turn into a low scoring defensive game.
Well Cunningham may or not even be able to play in the game but Louisville should know more by this weekend.
Lol. Rankings (esp pre-season and early season) are extremely subjective. But keep pretending that the AP and coaches use some scientific calculations.
