Well, thank you. Since I am an alumnus I find it easy to back the Cards. Beyond that, as a football fan (who made many trips to Lexington in the 60s, 70s and 80s to see at least 1 good football team), I am impressed with how far UofL football has come since my graduation. The school was on the verge of dropping football on 3 separate occasions between 1964 and 1984.Originally posted by jauk11:
While I respect your football knowledge about as much as I don't understand how you can back the Cardinals I think the UK 10 class makes a shambles of your theory about limiting the ratings to the top 17. And I do have to admit that there was NO explaining how that class turned out. I was very excited by Joker adding four of our top rated recruits in that class at the last minute, 4* Smith and 5.7s Gainer, Patterson, and Priester, but the only 5.7 that did didley out of our top 5 recruits was Sanders, an early Joker commit.
On the other hand of the SEVEN two stars listed in the class Bailey started several games his first year, Eatmon contributed, Huguenin may start this year, Mansour was a big plus, especially as a Senior, T Robinson started a lot of games, Shields played quite a bit, and Simmons played quite a bit, surely more than the 5.6 rated Trimble. The ONLY total flameout among the two stars was Ratliff that was only rated a 4.9 and showed up 2" shorter and 20 # lighter that caused the coach that recruited him to get fired.
Mixed results on the 5.5s and 5.6s, 5.5s Brause, J Johnson and Rumph played while I think Delic, Gibbs, and McDuffen didn't do much. Same with the 5.6s that should be solid contributors, Williamson, Douglas, and Simpson certainly did but nothing from the other four, Trimble, McAdoo, Laughlin, and J Henderson.
Certainly an anomaly and a strange class in the way expectations turned out though. I'm sure you could find some classes to back your point of view, I have always scratched my head about the 10 class, the beginning of the end for Joker along with losing most of the stars from the 09 class early, the two four star JCs plus the much underrated 5.6 Warford.
This post was edited on 2/17 1:20 AM by jauk11
I'm not sure I get your point about UK's 2010 class unless is to say the "bottom 10" contributed more than the "top 17". Well, that's the way it works sometime. The fact that the higher rated recruits were basically no shows does not change the fact they were the higher rated recruits.
But it does show that the real evaluation of a class comes after 4 years. The Cats 2010 class was ranked #50 with 26 recruits by the old Rivals system. Probably would have been a bit higher based on top 17. But the 4 year record for that class was 15-34 indicating that #50 was probably too high. The Cards were ranked just ahead of the Cats at #48 (24 recruits) but have seen 4 or 5 of that class go to the NFL and several more 5th year players likely to bio this year. Their 4 year record was 37-15 indicating their ranking was too low.
Ranking recruiting classes is a tricky business.
Peace