Recruiting does change frequently. I honestly think the majority of the time a kid is 75 percent sure he knows where he wants to go, but will release different intel to different people (and sometimes that info gets skewed/changed like a bad game of telephone) to drum up drama. It happens and it's tough to figure out what is true and what is smoke. Others can decipher that stuff better than I can.
What I would try to do is tell my confidence level and at least put things in perspective in terms of a timeline. If I'm hearing that UK loves their position with a kid in July but he may not commit until November, I think both should be mentioned/reported. Heck, it's always smart to never get overly excited about uncommitted in the summer because there is so much time to go. I would try to reiterate that, but still report the latest rumblings because I had a job to do. When I thought in the summer that UK was the team to beat for Carey it was because UK thought they had positioned themselves going into the visits to be the team to beat. That turned out to be false, and thus I looked silly. It happens.
I actually think I was one of the first to cool on Oscar Tshiebwe and I believe (I could be wrong) I was first to say "Hey, his host parents are really, really against the idea of playing anywhere besides WVU". That recruitment was difficult (as most are) because I do believe Oscar liked UK, but everything behind the scenes was a mess. Again, (in hindsight) I think he probably knew he was going to WVU but he liked entertaining the idea of doing something different, so I obviously had to report/talk about those pro-UK moments and how UK's staff was feeling.
I disagree about the breaking news bit of your post, but that's a pissing contest I don't want to get into to. Daniels, Bossi, Evans, Sisk and Fisher all do really great work in a tough job that is getting tougher. Rowland does an amazing job with football, but football and UK basketball are different animals. The guys that we were interviewing had been doing interviews for years. Some football targets have maybe done one or two and even reach out to reporters to get their names out there. Still, Rowland is so connected to the football program his insight is second to none.
But CI is lucky to have Sisk. This isn't a shot at Sisk, but it's not like he's breaking big time recruiting news left and right because there's just not a lot there. So, while he provides meaningful basketball recruiting commentary and updates I think his UK team breakdowns after games is an amazing content item that is insightful, unique and clearly shows how much he knows about the game.
I also hope my guess about Brooks is correct. He'd be a fun player in Cal's system and I'm anxious (if he picks UK) to see how Cal will use him. Put on weight? Slim and make him more of a wing/guard? It should be fun. Always nice to stick it to IU, too.