Bagley's family is living in Durham now, this was a done deal long ago and it didnt have anything to do with Mitch Barnhart or Sandy Bell.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like OP should cheer for UL, they do things the way he likes.Sounds like OP wants to Faaaaaar Sandy.
I agree with you 90% of the time, but I can't go with you here.It's time for a discussion about this. Cal has one hand tied behind his back, while Arizona, Duke, and whoever the hell else (north carolina?) Runs around winning at all cost.
Believe it or not, our compliance is a big problem. They've never trusted Cal, they didn't want Cal. It's just a fact. I fully believe they are our problem.
Let Cal loose, or find another program to hoodwink. Kentucky is a beast, let it go.
I'll say it again, and I've met the people. Mitch, Bell, and the rest are insufferable.
Unless you believe Cal decided against going after these guys all on his own? He barely sniffed Bagley.
Anyone?
It's time for a discussion about this. Cal has one hand tied behind his back, while Arizona, Duke, and whoever the hell else (north carolina?) Runs around winning at all cost.
Believe it or not, our compliance is a big problem. They've never trusted Cal, they didn't want Cal. It's just a fact. I fully believe they are our problem.
Let Cal loose, or find another program to hoodwink. Kentucky is a beast, let it go.
I'll say it again, and I've met the people. Mitch, Bell, and the rest are insufferable.
Unless you believe Cal decided against going after these guys all on his own? He barely sniffed Bagley.
Anyone?
I agree with you 90% of the time, but I can't go with you here.
Look, fair or not, Cal has to play by different rules. There's no legitimate debate on that.
His reputation, not that I agree, is that he's a dirty recruitor. If the NCAA, media, and sports talk people, are going to watch and react negatively to every thing Cal does that might seem shady, well, UK has to be as clean as a virgins honeypot. It's not fair, but, life sure as he'll isn't fair.
You are kidding I hope.It's time for a discussion about this. Cal has one hand tied behind his back, while Arizona, Duke, and whoever the hell else (north carolina?) Runs around winning at all cost.
Believe it or not, our compliance is a big problem. They've never trusted Cal, they didn't want Cal. It's just a fact. I fully believe they are our problem.
Let Cal loose, or find another program to hoodwink. Kentucky is a beast, let it go.
I'll say it again, and I've met the people. Mitch, Bell, and the rest are insufferable.
Unless you believe Cal decided against going after these guys all on his own? He barely sniffed Bagley.
Anyone?
And most of us who suffered through Emery-gate and Eric Manual, will say we are happy we have Sandy Bell and the UK compliance Dept, double their salaries, it's worth it!
If we (one of our players) were caught on something, we would not get the same treatment that Duke and (maybe) UNC get. If the AFAM scandal had happened at UK, we would have already been given the death penalty. Had Lance Thomas been at UK in 2012 instead of Duke in 2010, we would have lost that championship and Cal would have that 3rd strike against him. We ALL know this.
Hell, what would happen if UK got caught provided Prostitutes for recruits?
UK is not going to miss on Reddish-Williamson- Barrett. They will get at least one. At least.Also, the next class suddenly becomes huge for a number of reasons. If Duke lands Williamson or Barrett and Cal fails to land one of them, it further promotes a message that K fades into retirement with a slightly stronger recruiting hand against Cal in the head-to-head, as hard as that might be to believe (but not overall, mind you; just in the head-to-head). Cal has beaten K for…
Wall, Randle, Poythress, Noel, Knox, Murray and Green = 7 guys
K has beaten Cal for…
Irving, Parker, Ingram, Winslow, Tatum, Giles, Kennard, Bolden, Bagley = 9 guys
If K gets Barrett and Reddish, for example, in the next round and Cal strikes out on them (while Williamson goes to some place like Kansas), how would our fans feel in such a situation?
The good news is that K is going on 71 this February. Cal turns 59 in February.
UK is not going to miss on Reddish-Williamson- Barrett. They will get at least one. At least.
Great post..Agree totally. OP is in his 20's I believe and this type of thinking would be a good indication. Not too good of a judge of character if you think Mitch and Sandy are insufferable. Good grief.
Agree.Only those who have an agenda believe that he's a dirty recruiter since he's been here. Totally agenda and hate.
If you actually buy that Bagley wasn't interested in Kentucky, after having us at or near the top of his list for two years, you're naive.
The kid is an 18 year old who should be starting his junior year of high school right now, but instead he just enrolled to take college classes at a prestigious university in two weeks. There's one place that could happen.
USC is close to home and willing to take the gamble.
UCLA offers quarter class scheduling that would have made it more feasible.
But there's one place where Marvin Bagley could play college basketball in a month, and it just so happens they "guided" him through the reclassification process. Once he and his folks settled on the '17 class, he was never going to be allowed at Kentucky.
Just like Tre Duval begged for offers from major programs and only got one from Duke.
They're good enough as is, but factor in Capel's filth, the rules not applying to them, and K's sudden hunger for the One and Dones he said were ruining the sport, and that's a tough opponent to fight with one arm tied behind your back.
Problem is, there's nothing we can do. It isn't Sandy Bell's fault. She's doing what she has to, because if she gave these guys the greenlight, the NCAA wouldn't. We tried it with Kanter. So you either run the risk of a Rose retroactive vacation of the season or you land a recruit, he costs you another elite guy, and then he's ineligible and you get no one.
If you actually buy that Bagley wasn't interested in Kentucky, after having us at or near the top of his list for two years, you're naive.
The kid is an 18 year old who should be starting his junior year of high school right now, but instead he just enrolled to take college classes at a prestigious university in two weeks. There's one place that could happen.
USC is close to home and willing to take the gamble.
UCLA offers quarter class scheduling that would have made it more feasible.
But there's one place where Marvin Bagley could play college basketball in a month, and it just so happens they "guided" him through the reclassification process. Once he and his folks settled on the '17 class, he was never going to be allowed at Kentucky.
Just like Tre Duval begged for offers from major programs and only got one from Duke.
They're good enough as is, but factor in Capel's filth, the rules not applying to them, and K's sudden hunger for the One and Dones he said were ruining the sport, and that's a tough opponent to fight with one arm tied behind your back.
Problem is, there's nothing we can do. It isn't Sandy Bell's fault. She's doing what she has to, because if she gave these guys the greenlight, the NCAA wouldn't. We tried it with Kanter. So you either run the risk of a Rose retroactive vacation of the season or you land a recruit, he costs you another elite guy, and then he's ineligible and you get no one.
Completely agree.
I also disagree that Cal was outsmarted. My understanding is that Cal and staff were aware of the possible reclassification as early as march.
Agree, I also think Cal made it known to the family that Bamba was still going to be a priority.They were. Around the same time the "he's staying out west" rumors started. We started to fade the second '17 became a possibility, and it wasn't because Cal hadn't heard of some kid named Marvin Bagley III or because Nick Richards is on the roster.
Doesn't matter who we bring in. I can guarantee you next March Duke will have a dream path to the Final Four and UK will have the path from hell.
If you actually buy that Bagley wasn't interested in Kentucky, after having us at or near the top of his list for two years, you're naive.
The kid is an 18 year old who should be starting his junior year of high school right now, but instead he just enrolled to take college classes at a prestigious university in two weeks. There's one place that could happen.
This is about as spot on as it gets. Even in our 38-1 and AD tourney runs when we were the #1 overall seed still had the bracket loaded against us.Doesn't matter who we bring in. I can guarantee you next March Duke will have a dream path to the Final Four and UK will have the path from hell.
its hard to say he straight up beat Cal for some of those guys considering Cal cooled on them for other players.
I think the reason he barley sniffed Bagley (or is it that Bagley barely sniffed UK) is because Kentucky already has 2-4 5-star power forwards on the roster.
This is about as spot on as it gets. Even in our 38-1 and AD tourney runs when we were the #1 overall seed still had the bracket loaded against us.
This. I don't know how much of a say, if any at all, Mitch has with who we recruit. But asking UK to ditch Sandy Bell or ask her to do worse at her job is begging for an NCAA violation. We need Sandy at the top of her game 24/7.I'm good with it.
I'd rather play it safe. We've dodged a lot of bullets in Cal's tenure (Selby, Shabazz, Chane, Bragg, Muiday, Bamba???, etc.).
I know Duke has gotten a few of these reclassification kids lately, but it's not like we're recruiting at Tubby levels. I like the quality of most of kids Cal has been bringing in. No arrests. No suspensions for tripping other players. No hookers in the dorms (What kind of scum bag commuter college would do such a thing?). Generally likable guys who give back to their communities and leave the university in good academic standing. And we've won a bunch of games. I know the title-or-bust crew is getting antsy, but we've been in "the hunt" every year but 2013 and 2016 and were a top four seed every time but the amazing run of 2014. I can accept that after living through the great Final Four famine of 1999-2011.
Unfortunately, at Kentucky we've always got to play everything exactly by the book because our program is scrutinized more than any other in NCAA men's basketball. The NCAA want to catch us slipping so they can punish us for UNC's misdeeds. I'm OK with losing out on a few recruits if it means avoiding a major scandal or serious eligibility/amateurism issues.
I lived through the probation years at UK. I say leave it like it is and keep us on the good side. The players that Cal brings in are high character and make the grades. I am all in for Sandy Bell doing things the right way.
Who was the "insider" who came on here during Bamba recruitment and said he was told Bamba cooled on UK because Bagley was reclassifying and UK was favorite to get him. That was either made up out of whole cloth or something happened or someone advised against UK/Cal otherwise re: bringing Bagley in for this season.
I don't agree. I prefer sttong compliance.It's time for a discussion about this. Cal has one hand tied behind his back, while Arizona, Duke, and whoever the hell else (north carolina?) Runs around winning at all cost.
Believe it or not, our compliance is a big problem. They've never trusted Cal, they didn't want Cal. It's just a fact. I fully believe they are our problem.
Let Cal loose, or find another program to hoodwink. Kentucky is a beast, let it go.
I'll say it again, and I've met the people. Mitch, Bell, and the rest are insufferable.
Unless you believe Cal decided against going after these guys all on his own? He barely sniffed Bagley.
Anyone?