The odds for SEC Teams to make the final 4
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meanwhile, where do they put Puke and the rest of the ACC? I'm sure Puke has a higher % chance on ESPN than we do, because the majority of the employees at ESPN are ACC or Big East homers.The odds for SEC Teams to make the final 4
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
UT has never made a FF and they sure as hell won’t this year with one guy carrying so much of the load imo.The odds for SEC Teams to make the final 4
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
That’s what I’m saying, recent history aside for us, UT has never made a final four so they should be like 1% lmfao. I have to see how they came up with this.UT has never made a FF and they sure as hell won’t this year with one guy carrying so much of the load imo.
Yeah but UT has 100+ years of no final fours lol. Bama isn’t making one for sure, Auburn I could see but nobody know quite how good they are yet.I would say recent lack of success in March and Cal has been inconsistent/less than successful in games against highly ranked opponents in recent years (I know we beat a ranked Miami and UNCheat this year so far... I am talking last 3-5 year sample).
Look at the last 3 words of your title for the answer.The odds for SEC Teams to make the final 4
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
I would say recent lack of success in March and Cal has been inconsistent/less than successful in games against highly ranked opponents in recent years (I know we beat a ranked Miami and UNCheat this year so far... I am talking last 3-5 year sample).
The odds for SEC Teams to make the final 4
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
COW has at least made 4 final fours here and 6 overall.This is easy to explain and their right, Three letters COW
They’re right not their. It’s Cal not Cow, a cow gives milk, a Cal gives banners.This is easy to explain and their right, Three letters COW
That was the old days when Cal was here, we now have Cow, he doesn't do FF'sCOW has at least made 4 final fours here and 6 overall.
That was Cal, he's been gone for 4 years, The guy we got now gives milk.They’re right not their. It’s Cal not Cow, a cow gives milk, a Cal gives banners.
Probably due to having so many Freshmen … would be my guess. Simply have to prove the “experts” wrong !!The odds for SEC Teams to make the final 4
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
Without looking it up, my guess is they are using their BPI ranking system as a data source for this. It's the reason why they give A&M a 66% chance to win on Sat.The odds for SEC Teams to make the final 4
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
I see what you did there. Clever.Well, the good thing about that eSpN prediction is that it means absolutely nothing.
The odds for SEC Teams to make the final 4
UT- 22%
Auburn- 18%
Alabama - 16%
Kentucky - 6%
Make this make sense to me.
Well, the good thing about that eSpN prediction is that it means absolutely nothing.
I agree with this post. There is no way to argue that the ESPN expectancy numbers aren't a strong indictment of Calipari. One can argue that that indictment of Calipari arises out of an ESPN bias against U.K., I suppose ... but that doesn't remove the fact that the underlying statement of the ESPN expectancy numbers is clearly based on the CCC acronym - and, in my judgment, rightly so.I would say recent lack of success in March and Cal has been inconsistent/less than successful in games against highly ranked opponents in recent years (I know we beat a ranked Miami and UNCheat this year so far... I am talking last 3-5 year sample).
Well, Mychal ... if seeing that in the title of a thread "loses you", then you'll probably be perpetually lost on this board. Sorry.OP lost me with the "Just Seen" in the title..
Duke is 100%Meanwhile, where do they put Puke and the rest of the ACC? I'm sure Puke has a higher % chance on ESPN than we do, because the majority of the employees at ESPN are ACC or Big East homers.
I agree with this post. There is no way to argue that the ESPN expectancy numbers aren't a strong indictment of Calipari. One can argue that that indictment of Calipari arises out of an ESPN bias against U.K., I suppose ... but that doesn't remove the fact that the underlying statement of the ESPN expectancy numbers is clearly based on the CCC acronym - and, in my judgment, rightly so.
BingoThey do it because they know people will talk about it is my guess.
That was funny.That was Cal, he's been gone for 4 years, The guy we got now gives milk.
People are overlooking this for some reason, but it’s overwhelmingly likely to be the correct answer. It’s no conspiracy. The analytics just don’t like us as much as the pollsters for the time being.Without looking it up, my guess is they are using their BPI ranking system as a data source for this. It's the reason why they give A&M a 66% chance to win on Sat.
BPI is like a watered down version of KenPom or NET rankings. I'm guessing our poor defensive metrics are pulling us down in those rankings.