GYERO ARCHIVE
- Thread starter anthonys735
- Start date
- Status
Then you have the other Marty at the end going back to 1955 when the first Marty comes back. So now there's a constant loop of Marties going back to 1955. What if one of them fails? Does that kill the loop?
One of the best things about "Back to the Future" is that it doesn't even try to explain the Doc/Marty relationship. "Yeah, this high school kid hangs out with this crazy old scientist who steals shit from terrorists. What of it?"
I honestly have no idea why everyone is talking about Back to the Future all the time suddenly, and don't care to know.
Can't wait til it's over though.![[sick]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/sick/sick0006.r191677.gif "Sick [sick]")
Can't wait til it's over though.
And how does matthew Mitchell's hair work? Where does it begin? What if it's not full of product what does it look like
![[cheers]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/5628.gif "Cheers [cheers]")
-BBdk nailed it. I love local food when abroad, in most cases, but that airport BW3's is always WAF on return.
-I like B2F but I don't care that much to make a big deal of it.
-Pretty surreal that Pitino is still the coach. Even Bob V and his dude are saying the same thing. Has to be because they know he's just going to dig in. There's no other explanation.
-I like B2F but I don't care that much to make a big deal of it.
-Pretty surreal that Pitino is still the coach. Even Bob V and his dude are saying the same thing. Has to be because they know he's just going to dig in. There's no other explanation.
So if Pitino walks on his own, they dont have to pay him right? And if they can him, UL is on the hook for his contract, right?
So if thats the case, i mean... hes not going anywhere.
So if thats the case, i mean... hes not going anywhere.
In related news, "Rick and Morty," which began as a "BTTF" parody, is a fantastic show.
The thing that always bothered me -> Doc and Marty, on the night the clocktower is struck, have everything calculated down to the millisecond in order for Marty to hit the cable at the precise millisecond that the lightning is passing through it. They have the distance, acceleration, everything pinned down. Then, when it's time for Marty to hit the gas, the DeLorean dies. That right there should've ended the whole movie with Marty stuck in 1955. But no, he sits there and turns the ignition multiple times to no avail. Then, finally, after a good 10 seconds, he bangs his head on the steering wheel and the car starts. Shouldn't he miss the lightning by 10+ seconds, or whatever the delay was?
There's definitely a morals clause in there. But what constitutes "morality" at that place?
Yeah same issue with the timing, but maybe he got some favorable wind...
Other thought on the Marty/Doc relationship-maybe Marty asked him to build that gigantic amp in the beginning? Or he could just be a pedophile, par for the course in Hollywood.
Other thought on the Marty/Doc relationship-maybe Marty asked him to build that gigantic amp in the beginning? Or he could just be a pedophile, par for the course in Hollywood.
I think he at least used to, because people were discussing it back during the Sypher mess.
Guys are punching holes in a movie that involved a teenager in a shitty sports car traveling through time. The biggest problem is the fact that time travel doesn't exist and if it did I would hope they'd use a different vehicle.
If I had a "fun" car I think I'd go late 60's or early 70's American Muscle. A '69 Camaro time machine would be badass.
So the Terminator comes back in time to kill Sarah Conner before she gives birth to John Conner. The Terminator ends up getting destroyed, Cyberdyne finds the microchip, which ultimately leads to the creation of the super computers/robots in the future. So the only reason the Terminator exists was b/c Cyberdyne found this microchip from the Terminator sent back in time from the future.
Oh yeah, and John Conner's dad is from the future, and was only sent back in time to fight the Terminator. And John Conner tries to erase his own existence by preventing the future war, which is the reason his dad was sent back from the future in the first place.
Oh yeah, and John Conner's dad is from the future, and was only sent back in time to fight the Terminator. And John Conner tries to erase his own existence by preventing the future war, which is the reason his dad was sent back from the future in the first place.
Here is the language for Pitino's contract on Termination. They could definitely can him on 6.1.2 - I'd say UL has experienced some disparaging media publicity. Course Pitino could argue that UL's name was already crap. They could also argue he failed to adequately monitor his assistants - which is totally true, if he isn't lying about not knowing (he is lying, but they'll never prove that)
6. TERMINATION FOR J:UST CAUSE. 6.1 Employer has the right to terminate this Employment Contract for Just Cause or impose other appropriat~ discipline, in which case prior to such action, Employee shall be given ten 10 (ten) days' prior written notice and an opportunity to be heard!. The term "Just Cause" with respect to Employ¢r's right to terminate this Employment Contract shall be understood to include all o fthe following:
6.1.1 A material violation of this Employment Contract or refusal or unwillingness to perfomt this Contract in good faith and to the best of Employee's abilities;
6.1.2 Disparaging media publicity of a material nature that damages the good name and reputation of Employer or the University, if such publicity is caused by Employee's willful misconduct that could objectively be anticipated to bring Employee into public disrepute or scandal, or which tends to greatly offend the public, or any class thereof on the basis of invidious distinction;
6.1.3 Major violation of any rule, or bylaw of Employer, the athletic conference with which the University is then affiliated or the NCAA, which violation damages Employer or the University in a material fashion, including in the case of NCAA, significant or repetitive violations as set forth in NCAA Bylaw 11.2.1, but with the understanding that Employee shall not be responsible for misconduct of third parties, assistants, or other representatives of the athletic interest of Employer and University, unless Employee was aware of such misconduct and failed to promptly report it to Employer or Employee failed to exercise diligent, careful supervision of the assistants, or other representatives of the athletic interests of Employer and the University which could have disclosed the violation; and
6.1.4 Emnployee's (a) dishonesty with Employer or University, (b) acts of moral depravity, (c) convicti~n of a felony or employment- or drug-related misdemeanor, or (d) intoxication or being! under the influence of a psychoactive substance when performing duties under this Contract, wMn student athletes are present, when attending scheduled public events or appearances, or durin~ media contacts.
6. TERMINATION FOR J:UST CAUSE. 6.1 Employer has the right to terminate this Employment Contract for Just Cause or impose other appropriat~ discipline, in which case prior to such action, Employee shall be given ten 10 (ten) days' prior written notice and an opportunity to be heard!. The term "Just Cause" with respect to Employ¢r's right to terminate this Employment Contract shall be understood to include all o fthe following:
6.1.1 A material violation of this Employment Contract or refusal or unwillingness to perfomt this Contract in good faith and to the best of Employee's abilities;
6.1.2 Disparaging media publicity of a material nature that damages the good name and reputation of Employer or the University, if such publicity is caused by Employee's willful misconduct that could objectively be anticipated to bring Employee into public disrepute or scandal, or which tends to greatly offend the public, or any class thereof on the basis of invidious distinction;
6.1.3 Major violation of any rule, or bylaw of Employer, the athletic conference with which the University is then affiliated or the NCAA, which violation damages Employer or the University in a material fashion, including in the case of NCAA, significant or repetitive violations as set forth in NCAA Bylaw 11.2.1, but with the understanding that Employee shall not be responsible for misconduct of third parties, assistants, or other representatives of the athletic interest of Employer and University, unless Employee was aware of such misconduct and failed to promptly report it to Employer or Employee failed to exercise diligent, careful supervision of the assistants, or other representatives of the athletic interests of Employer and the University which could have disclosed the violation; and
6.1.4 Emnployee's (a) dishonesty with Employer or University, (b) acts of moral depravity, (c) convicti~n of a felony or employment- or drug-related misdemeanor, or (d) intoxication or being! under the influence of a psychoactive substance when performing duties under this Contract, wMn student athletes are present, when attending scheduled public events or appearances, or durin~ media contacts.
Has to be no obvious interim coach, they want to clearly lay out the justification before firing him and hoping that firing him saves some of the penalties. If they actually keep him after this... I mean even they can't do that. Right?
I had to watch that a couple of times to fully understand what was happening. Great movie though.
Imagine being UL's lawyer trying to justify canning Pitino for this after UL didn't do jack shit to him after the Sypher ordeal. Not the ideal bargaining position to be in.
Anyone ever watched Primer via Ipad while sitting on a balance ball?
Surely there's something in there about NCAA violations. That's the best way to go if you're terminating for cause. Wait for probation and then can him for getting you on probation. Sutton was a lame duck in Lexington a year while we waited on the hammer to drop. Pitino could be in the same boat this season.
Pitino could probably get fired based upon those terms, but no way does he without a settlement of sorts. Just can't see Jurich not tipping him out.
Well you could, but I'd argue whores in the dorm is par for the course, not damaging imo
A couple of issues. One was already noted, in that they didn't fire him over Sypher...so does that make it an argument in his favor if they tried to enforce it now? As far as the violations, the whole notion of supervision of assistants vs how could he know everything 24/7 makes it a ambiguous. Either way, resign/fired, they would work out a settlement. It is rare schools don't pay, regardless. Hell, didn't we pay psycho Gillispie $3M to go away?
Maybe this is a moot point since it is contract vs non-contract employees, but I often wondered if a regular employee at UofL would have a case if there were fired for something morality related, after UofL kept Pitino and hired Petrino?
I like how as soon as UL told him to quit talking, Rick put up a blog post.
"YOU DIDNT TELL ME I COULDNT BLOG!"
"YOU DIDNT TELL ME I COULDNT BLOG!"
Oh lordy, now this student lawsuit. Wanting book profits to be held in receivership, because Katina Powell is hurting the reputation of the university and devaluing their education/degree. 
Last edited:
Lived in my neighborhood in Huntingdon, TN. He started out at UT. We meet up at the 2007 MSU game at Commonwealth Stadium.
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Is Saturday the most anticipated game of the Stoops era?- Latest: KintuckyWildCayuts
-
