Ah, figured it was here too.
The video for the latest bomb.
The video for the latest bomb.
Go Jack!! He’s right. What’s next, having a 700 yard par 5?!
Life sucks. Get over it.A ball landing in a fairway divot should be a free drop.. Convince me I'm wrong!!
Jack's an old fart who wants to preserve as much of the original game as possible, and that is understood. However, he has the opportunities to design or modify the courses that put more emphasis on shot making over power....with power still being a part of the game. If a guy can hit it 400, then so be it. Last I checked Bryson was +1 yesterday.
If Kyle Berkshire was playing, are you going to take his biggest strength away?
Two of the smallest guys on tour were in the playoff last week on Jack's course...and they lit it up. What do you tell them?
Let's move the 3P line back...it's too easy now was the argument.... Let's move the fences back as everyone can hit a HR...times change, and the games change.
Total BS as he did nothing to improve his lie. I can't remember who it was (may have been Rahm as well), I believe on Sat they did a close up shot of a chip shot and it looked as close to moving as his ball did yesterday but nobody said anything. Fact is when the ball is up against grass there is a chance it's going to move in the slightest way when a player brings the club close to address.Made no difference in the end, but thought the 2 shot penalty on Rahm was complete BS. Commentators said PGA and the new rules had decided that "technology" would not be used to assess penalties. And then they had to use a HD 4K camera to show that the ball maybe oscillated 1 or 2 dimples, did not improve his lie, and no one could have possibly noticed except for the HD camera focused right on the back of his ball. I wonder if it had really mattered that they would have reached a different conclusion.
Thoughts?
Eli Barron still a go next Month?
Made no difference in the end, but thought the 2 shot penalty on Rahm was complete BS. Commentators said PGA and the new rules had decided that "technology" would not be used to assess penalties. And then they had to use a HD 4K camera to show that the ball maybe oscillated 1 or 2 dimples, did not improve his lie, and no one could have possibly noticed except for the HD camera focused right on the back of his ball. I wonder if it had really mattered that they would have reached a different conclusion.
Thoughts?
You gotta like Rahm's game right now but I like his wife even better.
![]()
Yeah even the homely Jason Dufner snagged a hot wife. I think he's divorced but still.It's funny how ladies will ignore a guys looks if he is rich. I say a pic of Luke Combs and his wife/girlfriend whichever she is. We all have a guy who looks just about like Old Luke in our town and they don't have a significant other who looks like that. NASCAR drivers like Kyle Busch are another example.
^^^No one is watching Paige's swing.
I was wondering if that was a senior or a ladies flex myself.LMAO, per his site, that's a 3x-4x shaft he's bending around like a garden hose.
Anyone tried the swing analyzer on 18birdies golf app? You just upload a video of your swing and the AI system rates you on a scale of 1-10 and gives you training tips to correct the issues with your swing. As a side note female golfer Paige Spiranic did it and her swing was, if I remember correctly, rated at 9.2 out of 10. I have watched a couple of guys trashing it on youtube but I wonder if a lot of it is due to them being "pros" and getting scores in the 7.5-8.00 range.![]()
Yea. She got to banging Tiger.Yeah even the homely Jason Dufner snagged a hot wife. I think he's divorced but still.
Let us guess. You play a 4 degree driver with a 6X flex, right?I was wondering if that was a senior or a ladies flex myself.