ADVERTISEMENT

CBS: UK winning despite Cal holding back Shep and Dilly

Like the Gonzaga game he put them in when it mattered ? Oh wait Dilly sat the pine the final 8 minutes and almost entire 2nd half. Oh wait we lost by 2 ? Oh wait how many out there complain about Reed and Dilly's defense saying that is why we lose. Yep.
I didnt recall that .. so against Kansas Dilly sets 8 minutes of half 2 and against LSU he plays 4 minutes ???? What in the literal Hell ?
Just rewatched the entire 1st half vs Kansas. Started down 9-0 with our standard lineup. Dilly came into the game and started lighting it up hit 4 out of his first 5 from 3 point range racked up 16 first half pts.
Reed came into the game a little later was on a heater hitting 2 straight 3's including a 26 footer and had at least 3 steals in the 1st few minutes he was in but picked up his 2nd foul with around 9 mins to go in the half and Cal sat him the rest of the half.
The end of the half proved to be costly we were up 12 but had a foul on over the back with less than 30 seconds left and Dickenson hit 2 FT's. Then with no Reed in the game Dilly drives and threw it out of bounds with 5 seconds left so instead of being up 10 with last shot Kansas got the ball and Dickenson hit a 3 at the buzzer.
We felt good about the 7 point lead at the half (and soon to be 14 point lead in the 2nd half) but we all know what happened.
Thiero was a beast in the 1st half as well but both Wagner and Burks sucked it up big time in the 1st half.
We didn't have any of our 3 bigs yet somehow we were out rebounded by only 3 (45-42) and Kentucky still managed 15 offensive rebounds while Kansas only got 8 offensive rebounds.
Pretty amazing playing with only Mitchell vs Dickenson.
What killed Kentucky is Dillingham picked up a couple early 2nd half fouls and then fouled out and barely played in the 2nd half he finished the game with just 16 mins
Cal held Sheppard down he played only 16 mins (finished with 3 fouls) that certainly wasn't the right move Sheppard went 4/5 from the field with 3/4 from 3 and 2/2 from the line.
Crazy Cal playing him just 16 minutes was criminal and a big reason we lost this game.
Play your best players
Oh and Wagner you ask ? Finished the game 1/12 from field for 4 pts

So by all means continue to not start your best players
If Reed starts this game we likely would have won (or maybe if Cal let him play more then Wagner at least)
Wagner 25 mins Sheppard 16 mins
Reed did get into foul trouble in the first half but he still only played about 11 mins in the 2nd half that was criminal.
bud it didnt affect draft position one bit . I jest.
 
Just finishing watching the 2nd half. So now I know why Reed only played 16 mins. He came into the game around 16 mins left in the 2nd half had a turnover and Cal sat him down for that mistake.
Reed played like 1 minute out of the first 10 mins of the half.

Cats led by 10 when Reed was benched
Reed came back in the game with the game tied
Kansas outscored Kentucky by 10 with Reed on bench from the 15 min mark to the 10 min mark
Oh and with Cats up 6 with 3:46 left Cal put Reed on the bench brought back Dilly and Harris hit a couple 3s back to back because Dilly left him alone.
So Cal took Reed out at 15 min mark up 10 put him back in tied
Cal then takes Reed back out at the 3:46 mark up 6
1 minute later game tied
Cal finally puts Reed back in the game with 2 mins left down 2 but too little too late
Cats down 3 with 8 seconds left Reed forced to shoot a 25 foot desperation 3 with a guy in his face and air balls it his only FG miss on the day. Ball game.
 
Last edited:
went back and reviewed the LSU boxscore .. fuuudge Ugo plays 32 minutes and has 2 points . Dilly plays 22 min . Burks and Bradshaw combine for 14 startling minutes????? WTH Big Z with a 3 min stretch, and we are actually not just kindly stating " Cal needs to play the right people and he hasnt been doing " And I dont care what happens , bar injury , he wont change
 
IMO, UK has to have some personnel balance whether starting, ending or during the game.

I think it has hurt DJ's play alot starting out games (since Mitchel injury) with UGO, Edwards (not counting the outlier game), Thierro and Reeves. That lineup only has ONE offensive threat who doesn't struggle to make something happen one-on-one. There is not enough balance on both ends of the floor and that's why you see UK start games with little playmaking, running no sets and just being OMG, randomly stale!!

The +/- metric is not the panacea but it says alot about individual players and rotations being efficient together by either being behind or being ahead. Three of the lowest +/- UK players right now are starters........

Also, I can see why most people would like to see Reed and Dilly starting but like some have said, Dilly would be in foul trouble by the first media TO, he should be UK's best perimiter defender but he is just too careless and NOT disciplined on D.

RECENT STARTERS (Lacking Offense/ Easier For Opp To Defend)
UGO-D (Sub: Z-O/D)
Thierro-D (Mitchell: hurt)
Edwards-D (?) (Sub: Dilly-O)
Reeves-O
Wagner-D (Sub: Reed-D/O)

OPTIONAL STARTERS (Playmakers/ Better Passers/ Harder to Defend)
UGO-D (Sub: Z-O/D)
Mitchell-O (Sub: Thierro-D)
Reeves-O (Sub: Edwards-D)
Sheppard-D/O
Wagner-D (Sub: Dilly-O)

https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2F3RqFkJ1%2F2752.jpg&hash=86f48d9534be9802da31eda5d6e178bb
 
I’d be ok if Reed started alongside Wagner. I think Wagner plays better with Reed on the court or at least two other guards on the court with him. Lineup of Reed/wagner/reeves/improved Edwards/Z.

Starting Wagner/edwards/Ugo together just makes zero sense since Ugo struggles offensively as it is and the other two have struggled all year. Throwing them in there with Theiro who also isn’t strong offensively compounds it all the more. An improved Edwards helps but we still need to see that consistency from him. Cal just makes this so much harder than it actually is.
 
The stats don't show that when Sheppard has started, we have lost a majority of those games. They also don't show that Dillingham gets a little loose with the ball and gets sloppy on defense which negates his playing time...
I wonder if we would have won the A&M game if Reed was hurt.
 
Plus a real slow walker...

SQZtb3u.jpeg
I had forgotten the slow walking thing correlating to mean KAT was lazy and not that good. My God the insanity. Thanks for the laugh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatPhight
If we had a coach that would’ve been starting the guys that deserve to be from the start and worked Z in as a starter when he was eligible and playing the lineup with Reeves, Reed, and Rob as many minutes together as possible. This team would only have 2-3 losses max.

But instead we’ve got Elmer Fudd!

He’s wasting the most talented roster in college basketball because he can’t coach!
 
Just finishing watching the 2nd half. So now I know why Reed only played 16 mins. He came into the game around 16 mins left in the 2nd half had a turnover and Cal sat him down for that mistake.
Reed played like 1 minute out of the first 10 mins of the half.

Cats led by 10 when Reed was benched
Reed came back in the game with the game tied
Kansas outscored Kentucky by 10 with Reed on bench from the 15 min mark to the 10 min mark
Oh and with Cats up 6 with 3:46 left Cal put Reed on the bench brought back Dilly and Harris hit a couple 3s back to back because Dilly left him alone.
So Cal took Reed out at 15 min mark up 10 put him back in tied
Cal then takes Reed back out at the 3:46 mark up 6
1 minute later game tied
Cal finally puts Reed back in the game with 2 mins left down 2 but too little too late
Cats down 3 with 8 seconds left Reed forced to shoot a 25 foot desperation 3 with a guy in his face and air balls it his only FG miss on the day. Ball game.
Must’ve been his gut telling him to run Reed in and out like that
 
Sure.

No difference in slow starts. You guys keep saying we wouldn't start so slow if we'd start who you want. But when Reed was the starter--the offense still came out slow.
I’m guessing it’s Edwards starting those games is where the problem lies.
 
Exactly! It’s like DJ has a contract that guarantees he will start. He used to start and then Sheppard would come in for him around the 15 min mark. Now DJ is lucky to play 2-3 mins before he’s getting subbed out. It’s just looks like he’s being~~ given a starting spot to pacify or satisfy someone. I’d be embarrassed at this point if I were him.
This ~
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFuqua
You're switching the argument. I'm not claiming we lost because Reed started.

The claim on this board is that: If Cal would just start the right guys, we wouldn't start slow and lose. But, Cal has started Reed multiple times. We've started slow in most of them. We've lost multiple games Reed started in.

I'm NOT claiming Reed starting is the reason we lost. I AM telling you we start slow even with Reed as a starter.
Most of the article was about playing Reed and Rob together. In the games Reed started I don’t believe Rob started with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1war
The best lineup has Reed in it, start him, end of discussion. Our starting lineup is statistically the worst lineup Cal plays. Cal doesn’t like being proven wrong so nothing will change. It’s not about DJ, Reed, or Rob, it’s about Cal, some won’t admit it.
Was the same last year when the pundits noted the Benny lineup was the best. Ticked Cal off and he would seldom play that lineup.

Cal is gonna Cal no matter what.
 
Sheppard is 2nd on the team in minutes and Dillingham would be playing more if he didn't foul so much...

Geez...you and some of your agendas that scream that you want to be validated...
I agree completely. Too many of the people here have confirmation bias.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: catben
I'm glad the guy mentioned Devin Booker, Cal's bench warmer, who moved on to the NBA in front of The Twins, and became the youngest player to ever score 70pts in a game.
It's not like Cal just got ignorant this year.
Booker was getting destroyed by Decker in that Wisconsin game. The pros is a great place for him since defense is optional.
 
I'm glad the guy mentioned Devin Booker, Cal's bench warmer, who moved on to the NBA in front of The Twins, and became the youngest player to ever score 70pts in a game.
It's not like Cal just got ignorant this year.
He definitely picks and chooses...vintage narcissist...

2AFpw89.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Blisterpac
This is the nail in the coffin of our season. Cal will never do it now. He’s a loser, so he’ll do what losers do and try to prove he’s right instead of making the tough decision and accept he was wrong.
He’ll never top Loser Tubby Smith annointing his JV son starting point guard at UK. No wonder the media, who hates us, wanted us to keep him. We had become the laughing stock of blue bloods. Saul! Lmao.
 
It’s borderline coaching malpractice to not give your best players the lion’s share of the minutes.
Ok now, Reed and dilly get minutes. This is more about the allocation of those minutes relative to the game clock. It seems like we have to hear about it after every game. It’s getting a little old now.
 
Last edited:
Just read this. The national media is catching on finally.
"Not starting his two best players and playing them for as many minutes as their young legs can hold for every meaningful game moving forward is just an unnecessary obstacle that might be what stands between a good Kentucky team and a great one."
Our nameless coach worshipers will tell you that who starts doesn't matter. He knows he shouldn't be starting DJ and Edwards which is the reason he quickly pulls them from games before the team gets too far behind. He feels that he has to keep their status as starters no matter what.
 
Do the next 5 minutes affect the game less than the 1st 5 minutes? I would think they matter the same.

Do you think DJ playing the same number of minutes hurts us less as long as he isn’t starting?
When you come out and jump on a team early, particularly a team that your better than, it hurts their confidence and confirms early that they are inferior. If they hang around early or even lead early their confidence grows and confidence is huge. There is indeed a such thing as setting the tone.
 
The analytics show that we don’t start off slow if we change the starting lineup?

That’s weird, because the scoreboard disagrees.
When has Reed AND Dilly started together? Which is clearly what the article is about. You continue to move the goalposts and mention one or the other starting.
 
Question for the "they get their minutes" crowd.

Do you honestly think it's better to have Reed and Rob get rest minutes at the beginning of the half and then play the rest of the half?

What's the advantage of that over giving them a breather when they really need it?
They need to be on the court to set the tone at the start of each half of basketball. It is hard to believe that we have reached the point of debating whether it makes sense to start the team's best players.
 
As much as every other 5 minutes span. Every point scored during the game counts exactly as much.
So does every potential point NOT scored during those first 5 minutes of each half. The lineup that gives us the BEST opportunity to score MORE is NOT the one starting both halves.

Cal KNOWS this yet STILL declines to start the best 5. Gotta get DJ and Justin more time to get better, tea and wins are secondary.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT