No one said anything you’re rambling about. Go back to your original post and read through to refresh your memory.
No one said anything you’re rambling about. Go back to your original post and read through to refresh your memory.
This will never not be weird as hell. Laughing before a press conference where you then start up the tears on cue? When have you ever seen that?
Are you f'ing serious? Dude is a f'ing wreck - your emotions would be all over the place.
I went to a funeral for a kid who was killed in a car accident. The mom laughed about something and then instantly burst into tears. It wasn't weird. It was normal.I have never seen someone laughing after losing a kid. That's insane. I don't know a single parent that would even be able to muster a smile after losing a kid.
Obviously the murders happened. But this is weird as shit.
That's fine. I've never seen that. You have. I haven't. Every experience I have had, it wasn't remotely like that.I went to a funeral for a kid who was killed in a car accident. The mom laughed about something and then instantly burst into tears. It wasn't weird. It was normal.
I have never seen someone laughing after losing a kid. That's insane. I don't know a single parent that would even be able to muster a smile after losing a kid.
Obviously the murders happened. But this is weird as shit.
I have never seen someone laughing after losing a kid. That's insane. I don't know a single parent that would even be able to muster a smile after losing a kid.
Obviously the murders happened. But this is weird as shit.
What am I arguing? I'm saying this is a weird AF thing to do as a grieving parent which I have never seen occur. It's pretty simple. You think my reaction to finding this being weird is the issue not the guy who was laughing but then as soon as he gets the nod for the cameras, shifts gears immediately?
Why this upsets you all so much is ridiculous. No one got in the way of the big leftist circle jerk in here. It's a relevant thing to post to the topic. Don't like it, don't read it, dude. I didn't @ you.
I'd say my post about Nole was spot on. Saw it a mile away with his rant trying to make the folks he likes victims of some sort of ongoing plot. Using Alex Jones talking points to attack the father of a slain child to say he's "insane" and "weird" is again, a choice I suppose.
I mean, all you can do is laugh and ask, "what tf is wrong with people?"
Did he yell "fire" in a crowded theater? It's astonishing how the Left misunderstands that cliche, which is no longer binding precedent, anyway, though it's not recommended to yell it in the theater unless there really is a fire. With that said, Jones was civilly liable and not criminally prosecuted, so there's a different free speech analysis.If I yell “fire!” in a movie theater, is that free speech?
There are limits to free speech. The astonishing thing is that is now your faction that wants to expand the limits. We literally have a candidate for VP who insists that "hate speech" and "Misinformation" are unprotected by the 1st Amendment. That's astonishing. Let me give an example of what is NOT protected- a bomb threat. Your own example probably would NOT result in charges, unless it caused a public panic (not because it's necessarily 1st Amendment protected, but because the police don't always arrest every idiot who acts out), but it would cause your ass to be ejected from the game.I tell you what, bub. I'll indulge is this ridiculousness. There are clearly limits to free speech, whether you acknowledge them or not. As noted, slander and libel laws are also real.
But regardless of that, go to a football game. Stand on your seat. Yell "HE'S GOT A GUN!" And see if you don't get charged.
Then argue there are no limits to free speech.
The first amendment applies to state action. There are many ways someone can get sued for engaging in “misinformation”. For example, if I do a business deal with you and you lie to me about a critical term in order to get me to do the deal, I can sue you for fraud in the inducement. As you pointed out, the Alex Jones case was a civil case so I’m not sure how this topic came up.There are limits to free speech. The astonishing thing is that is now your faction that wants to expand the limits. We literally have a candidate for VP who insists that "hate speech" and "Misinformation" are unprotected by the 1st Amendment. That's astonishing. Let me give an example of what is NOT protected- a bomb threat. Your own example probably would NOT result in charges, unless it caused a public panic (not because it's necessarily 1st Amendment protected, but because the police don't always arrest every idiot who acts out), but it would cause your ass to be ejected from the game.
So, here's an example of what IS protected - "Misinformation".