ADVERTISEMENT

Wolken on this UK team

Smashcat

All-American
Gold Member
Mar 13, 2012
76,207
110,088
113
The erosion has happened for a lot of reasons. The biggest is probably that older, more physically rugged players have become more important than the one-and-done freshmen that were Calipari’s specialty. There have been staff changes and some key, longtime Calipari assistants that were shoved to the side in an attempt to become more recruiting-focused. There has also been a staggering stubbornness to adapt to modern basketball until this year, as Calipari has finally embraced the 3-pointer and better offensive spacing.

But the change has come at a cost: Kentucky is now ranked just outside the top 100 in the defensive efficiency metrics, which is stunning in the context of Calipari’s long career. At UMass, Memphis and then Kentucky, defense was non-negotiable. It was the thing that saved his teams time and again when the shots weren’t falling. The effort his teams consistently gave on that end of the floor was probably Calipari’s best attribute as a coach.
 
The erosion has happened for a lot of reasons. The biggest is probably that older, more physically rugged players have become more important than the one-and-done freshmen that were Calipari’s specialty. There have been staff changes and some key, longtime Calipari assistants that were shoved to the side in an attempt to become more recruiting-focused. There has also been a staggering stubbornness to adapt to modern basketball until this year, as Calipari has finally embraced the 3-pointer and better offensive spacing.

But the change has come at a cost: Kentucky is now ranked just outside the top 100 in the defensive efficiency metrics, which is stunning in the context of Calipari’s long career. At UMass, Memphis and then Kentucky, defense was non-negotiable. It was the thing that saved his teams time and again when the shots weren’t falling. The effort his teams consistently gave on that end of the floor was probably Calipari’s best attribute as a coach.
Further proof that Calipari's motives and priorities have changed, and he is no longer coaching for what's in the best interest of the PROGRAM and tradition of UK. He should be fired "for cause". If this was even threatened or leaked to other schools ... who the hell would touch him? He's got a lot to lose by continuing this charade. He should be held to account.
 
The numerous posts that say this are so ignorant. Do people have zero clue how contracts and the business world work?
... until it's not. Cal doesn't coach for the betterment of the University or PROGRAM ... who pays him to do exactly what he's NOT doing ... that's breach. What exactly motivates Cal to make the decisions he does? You know ... the ones that make absolutely zero sense if he's actually trying to win games while using all the talent on the roster. If he's not guilty of breach, explain the Wolken and every other basketball mind across the country who are collectively scratching the heads watching Cal implode this basketball program.
 
I said at the start of the season, spending more time on offense didn't have it's drawbacks, certainly not when you're changing your entire philosophy and game plan. You usually focus on one side of the ball. We switched to offense, and things have looked better, but the defense took a hit because we probably didn't spend enough time on it as much as Cal usually does.

And it shows. Staying on your man, hard rebounding.. these were things most of the past teams were at least DECENT with. So I don't think it's a surprise to see our current team be so bad at it.

There are 10 teams in the KP that are top25 on both sides of the ball. And there is just ONE team that's top10 in both, Auburn.. who interestingly enough.. had quite a joke of a schedule to date. It's nice to bump your metrics when you played Baylor and... and... and not ONE other OOC team in the top62 in KP metrics lol.
 
Feeling Dumb Jim Carrey GIF
The erosion has happened for a lot of reasons. The biggest is probably that older, more physically rugged players have become more important than the one-and-done freshmen that were Calipari’s specialty. There have been staff changes and some key, longtime Calipari assistants that were shoved to the side in an attempt to become more recruiting-focused. There has also been a staggering stubbornness to adapt to modern basketball until this year, as Calipari has finally embraced the 3-pointer and better offensive spacing.

But the change has come at a cost: Kentucky is now ranked just outside the top 100 in the defensive efficiency metrics, which is stunning in the context of Calipari’s long career. At UMass, Memphis and then Kentucky, defense was non-negotiable. It was the thing that saved his teams time and again when the shots weren’t falling. The effort his teams consistently gave on that end of the floor was probably Calipari’s best attribute as a coach.
 
... until it's not. Cal doesn't coach for the betterment of the University or PROGRAM ... who pays him to do exactly what he's NOT doing ... that's breach. What exactly motivates Cal to make the decisions he does? You know ... the ones that make absolutely zero sense if he's actually trying to win games while using all the talent on the roster. If he's not guilty of breach, explain the Wolken and every other basketball mind across the country who are collectively scratching the heads watching Cal implode this basketball program.
Jesus some of you are clueless. Show me one coach in the history of sports who has ever been fired for cause for not winning enough. You can't fire a coach for cause for having the wrong "priorities" or for not winning enough, or for disrespecting the tradition of the program, or for whatever other nonsense you want to think of. That's not how a for cause termination works or will ever work.
 
... until it's not. Cal doesn't coach for the betterment of the University or PROGRAM ... who pays him to do exactly what he's NOT doing ... that's breach. What exactly motivates Cal to make the decisions he does? You know ... the ones that make absolutely zero sense if he's actually trying to win games while using all the talent on the roster. If he's not guilty of breach, explain the Wolken and every other basketball mind across the country who are collectively scratching the heads watching Cal implode this basketball program.
I'm sure the courts will agree with this argument
 
... until it's not. Cal doesn't coach for the betterment of the University or PROGRAM ... who pays him to do exactly what he's NOT doing ... that's breach. What exactly motivates Cal to make the decisions he does? You know ... the ones that make absolutely zero sense if he's actually trying to win games while using all the talent on the roster. If he's not guilty of breach, explain the Wolken and every other basketball mind across the country who are collectively scratching the heads watching Cal implode this basketball program.
You are just simply incorrect. I'm going to put a lot of information here, but this is word for word from his contract on what constitutes "firing with cause":

The word "cause," as used herein, shall mean the occurrence of any of the following:

Any major violations of NCAA or SEC bylaws or regulations in the men's basketball program (as defined by each such organization) by the coach, or by any person noted in Section 2(a) when the coach knew or had reason to know of such violation(s) and failed to prevent or attempt to prevent such violation(s), engaged in actions designed to conceal such violation(s), or failed to report such violation(s) to the Director of Athletics and/or the Director of Compliance;

Failure to follow any written University policies and procedures, including any written policies of the Athletics Department;

Acts of misconduct including, but not limited to, conviction of a felony, or a finding that the Coach has at any time materially violated NCAA or SEC bylaws, rulings, regulations or policies applicable to the University or to the Coach's prior employers at the time of the violation. Misconduct shall also extend to such major violations of NCAA or University rules or policies if committed by any personnel described in Section 2(a), when the coach knew or had reason to know of such misconduct and failed to prevent or attempt to prevent such misconduct, engaged in actions designed to conceal such misconduct, or failed to report such misconduct to the Director of Athletics and/or the Director of Compliance;

Refusal or intentional failure to furnish information relevant to an investigation of a possible violation of an NCAA or SEC bylaw or regulation or material University regulations;

Refusal to cooperate with the NCAA, SEC or University staff in the investigation of violations of NCAA or SEC regulations or material University regulations;

Involvement in arranging for academic fraud by or for prospective or enrolled student-athletes;

Involvement in offering or providing prospective or enrolled student- athletes improper inducements or extra benefits;

Knowingly and intentionally furnishing the NCAA, SEC or the University false or misleading information concerning the Coach or any staff member's or athletics representative's involvement in or knowledge of a violation of an NCAA or SEC regulation;

Knowingly and intentionally providing information to individuals involved in organized gambling activities concerning intercollegiate athletics competition;

Soliciting a bet on any inter-collegiate team or accepting a bet on any team representing the University;

Participating in any gambling activity that involves intercollegiate athletics or professional athletics through a bookmaker, a parlay card, or any other method employed by organized gambling;

Failure or refusal to provide, in compliance with NCAA Bylaw 11.2.2, a detailed account, in writing, to the Director of Athletics and the President of the University, on at least an annual basis, the sources and amounts of all athletically related income, compensation, gratuities, or benefits from sources external to the University;

or,

Receiving benefits for facilitating or arranging a meeting between a student athlete and an agent, financial advisor or a representative of an agent or advisor.

It is not the intention of the parties that this Agreement be terminable for minor, technical or otherwise insignificant University regulations or for NCAA or SEC violations which do not entail the risk of major institutional penalties. However, 'major infraction' violations by the Coach or by a staff member described in Section 2(a) or by a student-athlete or representative of the University's athletic interests where the coach knew or should have known of the violation of said bylaws of either the NCAA or SEC are 'cause' for termination of this Agreement by the University. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, it is hereby stipulated pursuant to NCAA Bylaw 11.2.1 that the Coach may be suspended for a period of time, without pay, or that the Coach's employment may be terminated if the Coach is found to be involved in deliberate and serious violations of NCAA or SEC bylaws. Coach acknowledges that the University is obligated to, and will report, all such violations to the NCAA and SEC. It is further stipulated that pursuant to NCAA Bylaw 11.2.1 if the Coach is found to be in violation of NCAA regulations, then the Coach shall be subject to disciplinary or corrective action as set forth in the provisions of the NCAA enforcement procedures. Coach may also be suspended for a period of time without pay for violations of material University regulations.
 
Jesus some of you are clueless. Show me one coach in the history of sports who has ever been fired for cause for not winning enough. You can't fire a coach for cause for having the wrong "priorities" or for not winning enough, or for disrespecting the tradition of the program, or for whatever other nonsense you want to think of. That's not how a for cause termination works or will ever work.
That's what courts are for counselor. It's pretty obvious Calipari doesn't have the best interest of the BB program in mind considering "his stated priorities". He's declared publicly that he doesn't coach for this University, this Program, nor the greater glory of BBN ... WHO PAYS HIM. Who does he coach for then? What the hell is he even doing here? IMO, the longer a man buries his head in the sand, the longer he shows his ass.
 
That's what courts are for counselor. It's pretty obvious Calipari doesn't have the best interest of the BB program in mind considering "his stated priorities". He's declared publicly that he doesn't coach for this University, this Program, nor the greater glory of BBN ... WHO PAYS HIM. Who does he coach for then? What the hell is he even doing here? IMO, the longer a man buries his head in the sand, the longer he shows his ass.
You know "for cause" has an actual definition, right? Feel free to go look at Cal's contract and find where it says he can be fired for cause if he has "the wrong stated priorities."
 
Further proof that Calipari's motives and priorities have changed, and he is no longer coaching for what's in the best interest of the PROGRAM and tradition of UK. He should be fired "for cause". If this was even threatened or leaked to other schools ... who the hell would touch him? He's got a lot to lose by continuing this charade. He should be held to account.
Listen I have been disappointed in Cal over the last few seasons but anyone who thinks that he hasn't done what he needed to so UK could be in the best position to win this year hasn't been watching or are just hating. Has he made a mistake in certain situations? Sure but for a good part of this season, and especially down the stretch, he has sat guys that will probably make the jump to the NBA in favor of guys who give us the best chance to win. Edwards, DJ, Bradshaw and Big Z have all had games where they were seated on the bench for a good portion of the game because of their play and especially inability to play defense.

There have been seasons where he did let his Burger Boys play over others but this hasn't been one of them. Edwards and Bradshaw are 6th & 8th in minutes played on the season overall and they would drop even another spot over the last 5 games because Ugo has played more minutes than both of them down the stretch. That is all because other guys who may or may not play in the NBA like Reeves, Adou (when healthy), Tre and Ugo are out playing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jazzycat
You are just simply incorrect. I'm going to put a lot of information here, but this is word for word from his contract on what constitutes "firing with cause":

The word "cause," as used herein, shall mean the occurrence of any of the following:

Any major violations of NCAA or SEC bylaws or regulations in the men's basketball program (as defined by each such organization) by the coach, or by any person noted in Section 2(a) when the coach knew or had reason to know of such violation(s) and failed to prevent or attempt to prevent such violation(s), engaged in actions designed to conceal such violation(s), or failed to report such violation(s) to the Director of Athletics and/or the Director of Compliance;

Failure to follow any written University policies and procedures, including any written policies of the Athletics Department;

Acts of misconduct including, but not limited to, conviction of a felony, or a finding that the Coach has at any time materially violated NCAA or SEC bylaws, rulings, regulations or policies applicable to the University or to the Coach's prior employers at the time of the violation. Misconduct shall also extend to such major violations of NCAA or University rules or policies if committed by any personnel described in Section 2(a), when the coach knew or had reason to know of such misconduct and failed to prevent or attempt to prevent such misconduct, engaged in actions designed to conceal such misconduct, or failed to report such misconduct to the Director of Athletics and/or the Director of Compliance;

Refusal or intentional failure to furnish information relevant to an investigation of a possible violation of an NCAA or SEC bylaw or regulation or material University regulations;

Refusal to cooperate with the NCAA, SEC or University staff in the investigation of violations of NCAA or SEC regulations or material University regulations;

Involvement in arranging for academic fraud by or for prospective or enrolled student-athletes;

Involvement in offering or providing prospective or enrolled student- athletes improper inducements or extra benefits;

Knowingly and intentionally furnishing the NCAA, SEC or the University false or misleading information concerning the Coach or any staff member's or athletics representative's involvement in or knowledge of a violation of an NCAA or SEC regulation;

Knowingly and intentionally providing information to individuals involved in organized gambling activities concerning intercollegiate athletics competition;

Soliciting a bet on any inter-collegiate team or accepting a bet on any team representing the University;

Participating in any gambling activity that involves intercollegiate athletics or professional athletics through a bookmaker, a parlay card, or any other method employed by organized gambling;

Failure or refusal to provide, in compliance with NCAA Bylaw 11.2.2, a detailed account, in writing, to the Director of Athletics and the President of the University, on at least an annual basis, the sources and amounts of all athletically related income, compensation, gratuities, or benefits from sources external to the University;

or,

Receiving benefits for facilitating or arranging a meeting between a student athlete and an agent, financial advisor or a representative of an agent or advisor.

It is not the intention of the parties that this Agreement be terminable for minor, technical or otherwise insignificant University regulations or for NCAA or SEC violations which do not entail the risk of major institutional penalties. However, 'major infraction' violations by the Coach or by a staff member described in Section 2(a) or by a student-athlete or representative of the University's athletic interests where the coach knew or should have known of the violation of said bylaws of either the NCAA or SEC are 'cause' for termination of this Agreement by the University. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, it is hereby stipulated pursuant to NCAA Bylaw 11.2.1 that the Coach may be suspended for a period of time, without pay, or that the Coach's employment may be terminated if the Coach is found to be involved in deliberate and serious violations of NCAA or SEC bylaws. Coach acknowledges that the University is obligated to, and will report, all such violations to the NCAA and SEC. It is further stipulated that pursuant to NCAA Bylaw 11.2.1 if the Coach is found to be in violation of NCAA regulations, then the Coach shall be subject to disciplinary or corrective action as set forth in the provisions of the NCAA enforcement procedures. Coach may also be suspended for a period of time without pay for violations of material University regulations.
"Acts of misconduct including, but not limited to". Why is "NOT LIMITED TO" part of the verbiage? He's not coaching for the benefit of the Program.
In his own words ...

“My first priority isn’t the Commonwealth of Kentucky, or the University, or the Legacy of the Program, or the greater glory of Big Blue Nation,” he writes. “I coach for the names on the backs of the jerseys—not just the front. My players.” -John Calipari

At some point, you have to take Calipari at his word. His actions certainly support his words and the result of his actions provide the ugly truth.
 
"Acts of misconduct including, but not limited to". Why is "NOT LIMITED TO" part of the verbiage? He's not coaching for the benefit of the Program.
In his own words ...

“My first priority isn’t the Commonwealth of Kentucky, or the University, or the Legacy of the Program, or the greater glory of Big Blue Nation,” he writes. “I coach for the names on the backs of the jerseys—not just the front. My players.” -John Calipari

At some point, you have to take Calipari at his word. His actions certainly support his words and the result of his actions provide the ugly truth.
He has done nothing to be fired with cause. If you read that paragraph and come away with that he could be fired for on court performance and not putting the university as his #1 priority, I don't know what to tell you. You're just wrong in this situation. That contract will not allow him to be fired for cause for anything you're mentioning. UK would lose in court every single time.
 
"Acts of misconduct including, but not limited to". Why is "NOT LIMITED TO" part of the verbiage? He's not coaching for the benefit of the Program.
In his own words ...

“My first priority isn’t the Commonwealth of Kentucky, or the University, or the Legacy of the Program, or the greater glory of Big Blue Nation,” he writes. “I coach for the names on the backs of the jerseys—not just the front. My players.” -John Calipari

At some point, you have to take Calipari at his word. His actions certainly support his words and the result of his actions provide the ugly truth.
I think most of us agree with your sentiment. But if you think for a second that a quote where he says he is coaching for the players on his team will hold up in the court of law as a legitimate means for termination then you are an insane person past the point of help.

I assume you have a career. So let me ask you this - is your first priority the overall success of your company? Or do you prioritize doing a good job with the work you have in front of you so that you continue to receive a paycheck and hopefully advance in your role?
And if your answer is the latter, do you think you should be fired?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Midway Cat
Further proof that Calipari's motives and priorities have changed, and he is no longer coaching for what's in the best interest of the PROGRAM and tradition of UK. He should be fired "for cause". If this was even threatened or leaked to other schools ... who the hell would touch him? He's got a lot to lose by continuing this charade. He should be held to account.
Casual use of the word “proof “
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
... until it's not. Cal doesn't coach for the betterment of the University or PROGRAM ... who pays him to do exactly what he's NOT doing ... that's breach. What exactly motivates Cal to make the decisions he does? You know ... the ones that make absolutely zero sense if he's actually trying to win games while using all the talent on the roster. If he's not guilty of breach, explain the Wolken and every other basketball mind across the country who are collectively scratching the heads watching Cal implode this basketball program.
So your evidence to back up the lawsuit is….

Not sure Wolkens opinion would carry water…
 
He has done nothing to be fired with cause. If you read that paragraph and come away with that he could be fired for on court performance and not putting the university as his #1 priority, I don't know what to tell you. You're just wrong in this situation. That contract will not allow him to be fired for cause for anything you're mentioning. UK would lose in court every single time.
That's your opinion. We differ in opinion and that's fine. Courts are there to settle differences. We are likely never to find out ... certainly not by this AD.
 
The erosion has happened for a lot of reasons. The biggest is probably that older, more physically rugged players have become more important than the one-and-done freshmen that were Calipari’s specialty. There have been staff changes and some key, longtime Calipari assistants that were shoved to the side in an attempt to become more recruiting-focused. There has also been a staggering stubbornness to adapt to modern basketball until this year, as Calipari has finally embraced the 3-pointer and better offensive spacing.

But the change has come at a cost: Kentucky is now ranked just outside the top 100 in the defensive efficiency metrics, which is stunning in the context of Calipari’s long career. At UMass, Memphis and then Kentucky, defense was non-negotiable. It was the thing that saved his teams time and again when the shots weren’t falling. The effort his teams consistently gave on that end of the floor was probably Calipari’s best attribute as a coach.

That all sounds great but is completely wrong. We know it's wrong because last few seasons we start strong then fade. If it was purely personnel or overall scheme, we'd struggle throughout.

The reality is the last few seasons we get worse because the more cal meddles the worse it gets. It's always chemistry stuff because he's awful at setting individual player expectations and roles. So guys get frustrated and performance and confidence fades.

I remember when KP left people said he was the players' guy and cal would struggle connecting. Boy we're those people ever right
 
  • Like
Reactions: NociHTTP
I think most of us agree with your sentiment. But if you think for a second that a quote where he says he is coaching for the players on his team will hold up in the court of law as a legitimate means for termination then you are an insane person past the point of help.

I assume you have a career. So let me ask you this - is your first priority the overall success of your company? Or do you prioritize doing a good job with the work you have in front of you so that you continue to receive a paycheck and hopefully advance in your role?
And if your answer is the latter, do you think you should be fired?
Again, if we don't believe "his own words", should we also ignore the results of his actions? Apparantly some here do. He's stated his intent and his priorities. There's an old saying that says, "whose bread you eat, whose song you sing". Cal is eating our bread ... he's just not singing our song.
 
Receiving benefits for facilitating or arranging a meeting between a student athlete and an agent, financial advisor or a representative of an agent or advisor.
I guarantee he is guilty of this one. I’ve thought for a while that he gets kickbacks from agents. He’s a really greedy man and the way he plays certain players over others. Cal is getting paid!

He is the only coach in NCAA history to have 2 FF’s vacated at two different schools. I wish they would go ahead and catch him up on it now.

Even if he has to provide documentation of him getting paid anonymously he will when he’s ready to step down.

He tries burning programs to the ground upon exit. He despises KY and the fans. He’s going to blow our program up. And he will walk away unscathed like he did at UMASS and Memphis.

A leopard doesn’t change its spots.
 
Listen I have been disappointed in Cal over the last few seasons but anyone who thinks that he hasn't done what he needed to so UK could be in the best position to win this year hasn't been watching or are just hating. Has he made a mistake in certain situations? Sure but for a good part of this season, and especially down the stretch, he has sat guys that will probably make the jump to the NBA in favor of guys who give us the best chance to win. Edwards, DJ, Bradshaw and Big Z have all had games where they were seated on the bench for a good portion of the game because of their play and especially inability to play defense.

There have been seasons where he did let his Burger Boys play over others but this hasn't been one of them. Edwards and Bradshaw are 6th & 8th in minutes played on the season overall and they would drop even another spot over the last 5 games because Ugo has played more minutes than both of them down the stretch. That is all because other guys who may or may not play in the NBA like Reeves, Adou (when healthy), Tre and Ugo are out playing them.
A truth bomb that is needed to be read by quite a few posters here. Well said.
 
Legally, Calipari has done nothing, that we know of, to justify termination for cause
By the terms of his contract we are stuck with him

I want him gone as much as anyone, but it’ll have to ultimately be his decision. One can only hope that enough pressure is brought to entice him to make that decision
 
Further proof that Calipari's motives and priorities have changed, and he is no longer coaching for what's in the best interest of the PROGRAM and tradition of UK. He should be fired "for cause". If this was even threatened or leaked to other schools ... who the hell would touch him? He's got a lot to lose by continuing this charade. He should be held to account.
Only proof I see is that the writer is an agenda driven dumbass

This team is not a team yet. It will be.

And that writer will disappear.
 
I guarantee he is guilty of this one. I’ve thought for a while that he gets kickbacks from agents. He’s a really greedy man and the way he plays certain players over others. Cal is getting paid!

He is the only coach in NCAA history to have 2 FF’s vacated at two different schools. I wish they would go ahead and catch him up on it now.

Even if he has to provide documentation of him getting paid anonymously he will when he’s ready to step down.

He tries burning programs to the ground upon exit. He despises KY and the fans. He’s going to blow our program up. And he will walk away unscathed like he did at UMASS and Memphis.
It has to be investigated and proven though
Even though I’m sure you’re entirely correct, all evidence is circumstantial
 
You are just simply incorrect. I'm going to put a lot of information here, but this is word for word from his contract on what constitutes "firing with cause":

The word "cause," as used herein, shall mean the occurrence of any of the following:

Any major violations of NCAA or SEC bylaws or regulations in the men's basketball program (as defined by each such organization) by the coach, or by any person noted in Section 2(a) when the coach knew or had reason to know of such violation(s) and failed to prevent or attempt to prevent such violation(s), engaged in actions designed to conceal such violation(s), or failed to report such violation(s) to the Director of Athletics and/or the Director of Compliance;

Failure to follow any written University policies and procedures, including any written policies of the Athletics Department;

Acts of misconduct including, but not limited to, conviction of a felony, or a finding that the Coach has at any time materially violated NCAA or SEC bylaws, rulings, regulations or policies applicable to the University or to the Coach's prior employers at the time of the violation. Misconduct shall also extend to such major violations of NCAA or University rules or policies if committed by any personnel described in Section 2(a), when the coach knew or had reason to know of such misconduct and failed to prevent or attempt to prevent such misconduct, engaged in actions designed to conceal such misconduct, or failed to report such misconduct to the Director of Athletics and/or the Director of Compliance;

Refusal or intentional failure to furnish information relevant to an investigation of a possible violation of an NCAA or SEC bylaw or regulation or material University regulations;

Refusal to cooperate with the NCAA, SEC or University staff in the investigation of violations of NCAA or SEC regulations or material University regulations;

Involvement in arranging for academic fraud by or for prospective or enrolled student-athletes;

Involvement in offering or providing prospective or enrolled student- athletes improper inducements or extra benefits;

Knowingly and intentionally furnishing the NCAA, SEC or the University false or misleading information concerning the Coach or any staff member's or athletics representative's involvement in or knowledge of a violation of an NCAA or SEC regulation;

Knowingly and intentionally providing information to individuals involved in organized gambling activities concerning intercollegiate athletics competition;

Soliciting a bet on any inter-collegiate team or accepting a bet on any team representing the University;

Participating in any gambling activity that involves intercollegiate athletics or professional athletics through a bookmaker, a parlay card, or any other method employed by organized gambling;

Failure or refusal to provide, in compliance with NCAA Bylaw 11.2.2, a detailed account, in writing, to the Director of Athletics and the President of the University, on at least an annual basis, the sources and amounts of all athletically related income, compensation, gratuities, or benefits from sources external to the University;

or,

Receiving benefits for facilitating or arranging a meeting between a student athlete and an agent, financial advisor or a representative of an agent or advisor.

It is not the intention of the parties that this Agreement be terminable for minor, technical or otherwise insignificant University regulations or for NCAA or SEC violations which do not entail the risk of major institutional penalties. However, 'major infraction' violations by the Coach or by a staff member described in Section 2(a) or by a student-athlete or representative of the University's athletic interests where the coach knew or should have known of the violation of said bylaws of either the NCAA or SEC are 'cause' for termination of this Agreement by the University. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, it is hereby stipulated pursuant to NCAA Bylaw 11.2.1 that the Coach may be suspended for a period of time, without pay, or that the Coach's employment may be terminated if the Coach is found to be involved in deliberate and serious violations of NCAA or SEC bylaws. Coach acknowledges that the University is obligated to, and will report, all such violations to the NCAA and SEC. It is further stipulated that pursuant to NCAA Bylaw 11.2.1 if the Coach is found to be in violation of NCAA regulations, then the Coach shall be subject to disciplinary or corrective action as set forth in the provisions of the NCAA enforcement procedures. Coach may also be suspended for a period of time without pay for violations of material University regulations.
I didn’t read all that but I like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cats192
... until it's not. Cal doesn't coach for the betterment of the University or PROGRAM ... who pays him to do exactly what he's NOT doing ... that's breach. What exactly motivates Cal to make the decisions he does? You know ... the ones that make absolutely zero sense if he's actually trying to win games while using all the talent on the roster. If he's not guilty of breach, explain the Wolken and every other basketball mind across the country who are collectively scratching the heads watching Cal implode this basketball program.
You need to go to business school....this is so unbelievably silly if you truly believe this. Again, i will say you (and many others) have ZERO understanding of contracts and what it would take for anyone to be fired "for cause"
 
It has to be investigated and proven though
Even though I’m sure you’re entirely correct, all evidence is circumstantial
Oh I know. He’s a smart thief. That’s what he’s the best at. He’s stealing 9 million annually from UK.

He was smart enough to not get caught himself at UMASS or Memphis.

I think he anonymously reports his illegal dealings while at UK when he’s ready to step down for a couple of reasons.

One, he despises KY fans. ALL KY fans.
Two, it will make him the talk of college basketball. He loves the limelight and will love all the attention he will be getting.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT