Spending ahs little to do with education results if you look at national numbers. There are some very fine programs spending half as much on students and getting much better results. KEA has been in charge of our states education for decades and they've failed. Every attempt to go around them is met with fear mongering and crying children.
I was just curious as to which metric he was using to compare the two states. He isn't talking post secondary because he mentioned kera.
It usually means dollars, but we spend more than they do.
Well, next go to act scores. Both states require each junior class to participate. Both states have identical results.

I think we are left with "feels like Kentucky is more anti ed".