A
anon_q409idbs5m40a
Guest
Fully agree with this. I was still living in Kentucky and was at UK during Hall's entire tenure. For those who say he underachieved looks at the man's record; three Final Fours, one title, one runner-up and he won the NIT when it was still a somewhat prestigious tournament. If you say Hall underachieved with the talent he had then you can make similar points about Cal. The bottom line is that it's incredibly difficult to win National Title no matter who you have on the roster. IMO, his two best coaching jobs were in 1973 and 1985. In 1985 he took an undersized team to the final 16 of the NCAA and beat UNLV with much less talent that they had that year. I used to see him on campus and he would always speak to students while he was headed to the Coliseum. The man deserves respect and he put up with a ton of abuse while coaching at UK. I think he simply got tired of coaching as 13 years is an eternity to be at UK.If Cal is above reproach, and let's face it, there's about 60% of the board who believe he is, then Hall should be extremely close to untouchable. Personally I think Cal needs to put together another final four or title before he eclipsed Hall all together. It's essentially 1a and 1b. He probably will by the 13th year mark if he stays though.
Hall had a brutal way through. People think following Cal will be tough? Try following a man with 4 titles. If you don't get that then you're in denial about the man and his situation.
College administrations were incredibly liberal in the way they ran athletics back then. Everyone who was winning was cheating. Everyone. Kentucky was hated then just like now and were held to a standard unlike others. The playing field was even as far as I'm concerned.
Hall was a good man and without him we simply are not the program we are today. In a lot of ways, he's as important as Rupp.
Give Respect.