KAT is one of the most overrated players in the NBA.KAT has not / will not accomplish near as much as AD in the NBA. AD is known as both an offensive and defensive star. KAT hasn't accomplished anything in the NBA. Big KAT fan, but he got abused in a series that he was suppose to dominate with PJ Washington guarding him.
This is the only right answer. The second best UK player is more of a debate; that I'd have to think about for a while.
Actually it isn’t an opinion at all. In fact, NBA title winners aren't officially recognized as world title winners anywhere except in people’s minds. Sorry. What you posted is an opinion and what I posted is FACT.That’s your opinion and has absolutely no effect on the facts presented in my post or how the league brands and markets its title.
Actually it isn’t an opinion at all. In fact, NBA title winners aren't officially recognized as world title winners anywhere except in people’s minds. Sorry. What you posted is an opinion and what I posted is FACT.
Nice. I’d say that’s 2/3 of my answer. My favorite player was Mashburn.I would say the best was AD. Best career: Issel, maybe Walker?
My favorite, Macy
Also, basketball is relatively young game and players learn from those before them. For anybody to think somebody like Issel would have the exact same game if he came along today is very narrow minded. If Issel came along today he'd have more muscles, more ball handling ability, and longer shooting range. Smart players didn't practice shooting from 24 feet when it was worth 2 points; then it was a bad shot that would just get the shooter a spot on the bench.Some have said that they didn’t think Issel could compete with modern players but I disagree. To do what he did without all of the modern advantages of training, nutrition, rehab and medical that modern players have is incredible. Also, the most important things that Issel had over present players is heart and a drive to succeed. He was just plain tough.
I can't look it up right now but I believe Groza averaged 15 or 19 points one year in college when teams rarely scored over 40. That would probably translate to 30+ points in modern ball.since is summer, her is another article about how great Alex Groza was.
Alex Groza
Born: October 7, 1926 Died: January 21, 1995 Position: Center Professional Career Indianapolis Oympians (NBA): 1949-’51 Alex Groza was bona fide, qualified and without a shadow of a doubt Hal…prohoopshistory.wordpress.com
It’s crazy what numbers he was putting in his first two and only years in NBA especially during those times. The comparison of his potential to be on par if not greater than George Mikan, shows how great Groza was.
In 1949, Groza’s senior season, the Wildcats went 32-2 and again captured the national title. Without the services of Rollins, who had graduated, Groza stepped up his performance dramatically that season averaging 20.5 points and upped that impressive number to 27 during the NCAA tournament. He was named the Final Four’s Most Outstanding Player for the second consecutive season.I can't look it up right now but I believe Groza averaged 15 or 19 points one year in college when teams rarely scored over 40. That would probably translate to 30+ points in modern ball.
OPThe Olympians of Groza and Beard played the Lakers of George Mikan:
In Game 1, Minneapolis throttled the Olympians 95 to 81. Groza scored a “measly” 19 points. For Game 2, Alex struck back with a fury. He pasted the Lakers for 40 points as Indianapolis ran away with the game 108-88. Opposing center George Mikan, battling through a leg injury, managed just 2 points. For the deciding Game 3, Groza again came up huge with 38 points. Mikan, however, returned to form with 30 and the Lakers edged out the Olympians 85 to 80. That was the last basketball game Groza played in the NBA.
Thanks for sharing this. I knew little of Groza's career at UK and nothing of his pro yearssince is summer, her is another article about how great Alex Groza was.
Alex Groza
Born: October 7, 1926 Died: January 21, 1995 Position: Center Professional Career Indianapolis Oympians (NBA): 1949-’51 Alex Groza was bona fide, qualified and without a shadow of a doubt Hal…prohoopshistory.wordpress.com
It’s crazy what numbers he was putting in his first two and only years in NBA especially during those times. The comparison of his potential to be on par if not greater than George Mikan, shows how great Groza was.
I have been following since 1959. Love those guys but you are way off base.John Wall and Jamal Mashburn were the two most talented players we ever had at Kentucky. Watch tape of the way those guys move, either here or in the NBA, compared to anyone else at all. It’s like watching panthers vs. horses (both allusions intentional). I respect other people’s choices of other guys who had more size advantages. But for me it’s that pure unalloyed talent that really gets my blood pumping. I give Mash the edge because he had the outside shot as well, plus a ridiculous amount of strength on top of it all.
And a 3 time All American at UKDon't forget this little nugget: Cotton Nash is one of very few to play in two professional leagues, NBA and MLB. Just a handful.
lol. Dear Lord. Did u ever see Issel play. Davis was only there for one year. Oscar and Wall don’t even merit honorable mention.If you wanna answer it less as an opinion and more based on what the “correct” answer is, I think it probably has to be one of the players who won NPOY. It’s hard to say you’re the best player in program history if you weren’t even recognized as the best player in college while you were there (Sorry, Issel). Saying this, we have only had five NPOYs at Kentucky. Two of them were in the 30s and I think it’s fair to say that college basketball players are more skilled and athletically gifted now than they were then. That rules Forest Sale and LeRoy Edwards out. You’re left with John Wall, Anthony Davis and Oscar Tshiebwe . Davis not only nabbed the most awards in his year — he also led his team to a national championship.
The “correct” answer: Anthony Davis
The “fun” personal answer: Alex Groza
That is not what the thread is about. We are not transporting players. It’s the best player, period. That would be Dan Issel.How many facts can you get wrong here?
FYI Nba had a 3 point line for 6 years of his career
When Isse was between the age of 31 to 37.
I know the average life expectancy was 51, but he should demonstrate some ability.
He shot like 20 percent.
And the ABA also had a 3 point shot at the beginning of his career.
Between the age of 22 and 27 where he shot like 15 percent.
And you can give me all the excuses he was bad at it.
But the result is he wasn't good at it.
Wilt and Kareem were over 7 feet tall. That translates.
Issell was 6-8. In 1970, that meant something. And he probably could shot from 17 feet out and it blew everyone's mind. All those 6-4 doughy power forwards waddling out that far to guard him, he probably had all the time in the world. No one could see it on tv, so those at the game were probably telling everyone at home he was shooting it from the logo.
He dominated his time before young people worked hard and were disciplined and pushed themselves to be good at what they do. He should be commended. Depending on your definition you could argue he was the best player at Kentucky. But again, you teleport that kid in to a game today, and he would be on the bench.
Okay but supporting arguments or why pipe up.I have been following since 1959. Love those guys but you are way off base.
Piss off, Don. You're not even sharp enough to understand that your opinions are only opinions. Keep them to yourself if you can't play nice about them.lol. Dear Lord. Did u ever see Issel play. Davis was only there for one year. Oscar and Wall don’t even merit honorable mention.
You piss off. You are just a kid. You can’t compare these guys to Dan because you never saw him play. I have seen them all and he is hands down the best. Grow up. Yes it’s my opinion but it’s also 1000’s of other uk fans opinion too. His records speak for themselves.Piss off, Don. You're not even sharp enough to understand that your opinions are only opinions. Keep them to yourself if you can't play nice about them.
No. But I trust that Dan Issel wasn’t the best player in college basketball in 69 or 70. That was Pistol Pete according to a lot of people who were not Kentucky fans. As fans, we are biased. Issel has excellent stats and deserves respect as a legend but he didn’t win NPOY once, didn’t win a single title and didn’t even make a single Final Four. To me, those things matter. If they don’t to you, I understand.lol. Dear Lord. Did u ever see Issel play. Davis was only there for one year. Oscar and Wall don’t even merit honorable mention.
We are talking about the best player in UK history. Pete went to LSU and I loved him. He was fabulous and was the best in college basketball. Dan was UK’s best ever.No. But I trust that Dan Issel wasn’t the best player in college basketball in 69 or 70. That was Pistol Pete according to a lot of people who were not Kentucky fans. As fans, we are biased. Issel has excellent stats and deserves respect as a legend but he didn’t win NPOY once, didn’t win a single title and didn’t even make a single Final Four. To me, those things matter. If they don’t to you, I understand.
No disrespect but to be the “greatest” in any sport, whether it’s NBA or NCAA, I think it’s fair to say winning is what matters most. Many will start and end with stats to say LeBron, for example, is better than Jordan. I try to remain consistent that MJ is the greater player because winning matters more. Same logic here. I can’t say Issel without a Final Four. 33 points per game is eye popping, jaw dropping, etc but he had good teammates like Pratt, Steele and Casey. Still never in the three years made a Final Four. Will apply the same standards to anyone in this conversation from now on. It’s fair to use objective awards rather than simply comparing stats. That’s why, to me, I witnessed Jodie Meeks be a weapon — he’s still not greater, to me, than a Tony Delk.We are talking about the best player in UK history. Pete went to LSU and I loved him. He was fabulous and was the best in college basketball. Dan was UK’s best ever.
Pistol Pete was maybe the most spectacular offensive player I've ever seen but if I was choosing between him and Issel to start a team I'd pick Big Dan. Pete didn't play a lot of defense.No. But I trust that Dan Issel wasn’t the best player in college basketball in 69 or 70. That was Pistol Pete according to a lot of people who were not Kentucky fans. As fans, we are biased. Issel has excellent stats and deserves respect as a legend but he didn’t win NPOY once, didn’t win a single title and didn’t even make a single Final Four. To me, those things matter. If they don’t to you, I understand.
Anybody that says that Dan Issel wouldn't be a star today is just showing how basketball ignorant that they are. If you don't believe that Issel would be a star today. Then I suggest that you ask Kareem Abdul-Jabbar arguably the greatest big man to ever play the game about how great that Issel was. Jabbar has said that he hated playing against Dan Issel more that any center that he ever played against..... NUFF SAID!!!How many facts can you get wrong here?
FYI Nba had a 3 point line for 6 years of his career
When Isse was between the age of 31 to 37.
I know the average life expectancy was 51, but he should demonstrate some ability.
He shot like 20 percent.
And the ABA also had a 3 point shot at the beginning of his career.
Between the age of 22 and 27 where he shot like 15 percent.
And you can give me all the excuses he was bad at it.
But the result is he wasn't good at it.
Wilt and Kareem were over 7 feet tall. That translates.
Issell was 6-8. In 1970, that meant something. And he probably could shot from 17 feet out and it blew everyone's mind. All those 6-4 doughy power forwards waddling out that far to guard him, he probably had all the time in the world. No one could see it on tv, so those at the game were probably telling everyone at home he was shooting it from the logo.
He dominated his time before young people worked hard and were disciplined and pushed themselves to be good at what they do. He should be commended. Depending on your definition you could argue he was the best player at Kentucky. But again, you teleport that kid in to a game today, and he would be on the bench.