Did all of the other teams not have a chance to win it ? Look, I get it, Covid, blah blah blah, BUT, they had the same hurdles to overcome as all the other teams. That Laker team was actually pretty damn good. Not like they was scrubs and was gifted the title. Was the #1 eed and beat Denver and a really stout Miami team.It was the Disney bubble-ship 3 months after the season was suspended by Covid. It counts, technically. It wasn’t like any other NBA finals ever and had more to do with giving Lebron a post-Floyd championship than anything.
Have to disagree.Best Single Game - Goose Givens
Agreed. I'd have to say Mashburn though for number 2.This is the only right answer. The second best UK player is more of a debate; that I'd have to think about for a while.
Have to disagree.
Best single game is Bill Spivey’s performance against Xavier on Feb 13, 1951
40 points, 34 rebounds
Good Lord, Mash was so damn good. An absolutely phenomenal all around basketball player. If not for injuries, he would’ve been an excellent pro IMHO.Not sure but I became a fan largely because of Mashburn, Delk, and Mercer
He was before my time but my dad always talked about him and Beard. If it weren't for the so-called scandal he would have been considered one of the best ever to play, period.The game basketball changed and the players are more athletic, skilled and have more media exposure. UK was blessed with many many great players.
In my mind , if you look at the accomplishments, there is only one choice: The number 15 at Kentucky who:
- was the captain and center of the fabulous five
- won two ncaa championships 1948 and 1949
- won gold medal leading the US 1948 Olympic team on scoring
-was three-time All-American and All-SEC,
-was two-time NCAA Final Four Most Outstanding Player
- got selected with 2nd overall pick in BAA by Indianapolis Olympians
- averaged 23.4 points per game in his rookie season and was named NBA Rookie of the Year
- was selected as NBA All-Star (1951)
- was 2× All-NBA First Team (1950, 1951)
Yes, I am bias , but my number one Kentucky player is Alex John Groza.
Very FIRST player Ole catsfanbgky remembers cheering for. Born in 69 so, was a youngin when I watched Grevey. Baller. Now all time, he is not my favorite.My personal favorite was Kevin Grevey. But all time best was Dan Issel and Anthony Davis
Watched him play and he was a great one.Dan Issel . . . but he was before my time.
54 points, 8 rebounds. I don’t think that’s as dominating as Spivey’s 40 and 34.
Yep Ralph Beard was the bestMost important for UK history -Ralph Beard.
Best individual career -Dan Issel.
Best single season — Anthony Davis.
Best Single Game - Goose Givens
Best Team Career -Wayne Turner.
Most influential in the modern era -Jamal Mashburn.
This is my all-Kentucky Basketball team.
Agree. One of nation's best college basketball players for his era. Amazing player.Hagan gotta be up there close.
- A sophomore backup on Kentucky’s 1951 national champions, Cliff Hagan came into his own as a junior. He averaged 21.6 and 24 points per game in his last two seasons, with the latter average (a Wildcats record at the time) tying for third-best in school history.
At 6’4”, Hagan was a center for Kentucky, averaging 13.4 rebounds per game for his career.
Hagan put up impressive numbers in the NBA as well, averaging 20 points or better in four straight seasons and double-digit rebounds in three. A six-time All-Star and one-time NBA champ, Hagan spent the great majority of his Hall of Fame career with the Hawks.
ESPN classic:He was before my time but my dad always talked about him and Beard. If it weren't for the so-called scandal he would have been considered one of the best ever to play, period.
How many facts can you get wrong here?Are you serious? He had a Hall of Fame professional career and there was no 3 point shot in when Issel played at UK and his best professional years were behind him when the NBA adopted the 3 point shot. If you're not joking it's possibly the worst basketball take I've ever read on this board. Just FYI the NBA adopted the 3 point shot in Issel's next to last season when he was 37 years old and the NBA 3 point line is almost 24 feet from the basket. When it was worth only two points players with a lick of sense did not practice from that range, since if it wasn't to beat the clock it was just a bad shot when it counted for 2 points and almost any coach in the world would bench any player for shooting from that distance. That's why even Larry Bird wasn't a good 3 point shooter when he came into the NBA the first couple years.
And finally, if you think Issel would be a scrub today because he played in 1970 that logic would lead you to believe that Kareem and Wilt also couldn't play in the modern game since they came along before Issel...so are you sure you don't want to just delete that post?
I might have misremembered a historical fact or two but there is one thing I'll never be; I'll never be the guy that said, and was completely serious, that if Dan Issel played today he'd be a backup to Amari Williams. That will always be you and I'll bet you money nobody will say that's a smart take.How many facts can you get wrong here?
FYI Nba had a 3 point line for 6 years of his career
When Isse was between the age of 31 to 37.
I know the average life expectancy was 51, but he should demonstrate some ability.
He shot like 20 percent.
And the ABA also had a 3 point shot at the beginning of his career.
Between the age of 22 and 27 where he shot like 15 percent.
And you can give me all the excuses he was bad at it.
But the result is he wasn't good at it.
Wilt and Kareem were over 7 feet tall. That translates.
Issell was 6-8. In 1970, that meant something. And he probably could shot from 17 feet out and it blew everyone's mind. All those 6-4 doughy power forwards waddling out that far to guard him, he probably had all the time in the world. No one could see it on tv, so those at the game were probably telling everyone at home he was shooting it from the logo.
He dominated his time before young people worked hard and were disciplined and pushed themselves to be good at what they do. He should be commended. Depending on your definition you could argue he was the best player at Kentucky. But again, you teleport that kid in to a game today, and he would be on the bench.
Correct. Scoring leader in 3 years. Next question.This is the only right answer. The second best UK player is more of a debate; that I'd have to think about for a while.
I thought I was correct until the gentleman earlier in the thread informed me that Issel couldn't beat out Amari Williams if he played today. He had stats to back up his argument but I wasn't quite convinced.Correct. Scoring leader in 3 years. Next question.
Dan Issel or Anthony Davis. If it wasn't for a point shaving scandal that Bill Spivey was never implicated in but still costed him his basketball career. The maybe if not probably 7'0" Bill Spivey would have been our greatest player ever. Joe B Hall said that he heard people say that if Spivey would have been allowed to have his NBA career that he would be considered as one of the 5 greatest centers to ever play the game.All in fun. Who is your pick
Anthony Davis played one year at Kentucky. Dan Issel played a full college career at Kentucky and is still our all time leading scorer. You say Davis is the "correct" answer because he was recent and because he is an excellent pro now. But there is no reasonable question it was really Issel as things now stand.If you wanna answer it less as an opinion and more based on what the “correct” answer is, I think it probably has to be one of the players who won NPOY. It’s hard to say you’re the best player in program history if you weren’t even recognized as the best player in college while you were there (Sorry, Issel). Saying this, we have only had five NPOYs at Kentucky. Two of them were in the 30s and I think it’s fair to say that college basketball players are more skilled and athletically gifted now than they were then. That rules Forest Sale and LeRoy Edwards out. You’re left with John Wall, Anthony Davis and Oscar Tshiebwe . Davis not only nabbed the most awards in his year — he also led his team to a national championship.
The “correct” answer: Anthony Davis
The “fun” personal answer: Alex Groza
Let's see if Amari Williams can score 2000 pts in 3 years.I thought I was correct until the gentleman earlier in the thread informed me that Issel couldn't beat out Amari Williams if he played today. He had stats to back up his argument but I wasn't quite convinced.
No. I used facts. You’re saying Issel because he played three years but the question was who you would pick as the best player. I see that as one season. The question isn’t who had the best career at Kentucky. Then i think it would be Groza or maybe even Walter Hirsch. Issel wasn’t NPOY even once and didn’t win a single title.Anthony Davis played one year at Kentucky. Dan Issel played a full college career at Kentucky and is still our all time leading scorer. You say Davis is the "correct" answer because he was recent and because he is an excellent pro now. But there is no reasonable question it was really Issel as things now stand.