Duke is better in both places. Kansas is better in both places. You guys set yourself up for unrealistic expectations. You will be pre season 15ish? And you’re talking about how much better your roster is than the pre season 1-2? Cal is going to have develop players eventually because the 18-19 year old kids with no experience don’t win anything.
Perhaps pre-season rankings are the be-all, end-all when it comes to this? I would take our guards/wings over Kansas's (granted I don't know anything about Furphy) and I think Duke's guards are even with ours, albeit both teams have more experience, which helps in Nov/Dec.
But, I have zero doubt that both teams have better and more experienced frontcourts than us.
If we had gotten Dickinson at UK, rather than Tre Mitchell, we would've been pre-season top 5, EVEN though Mitchell is a far better fit for our team. We were ranked 6th right at the end of April when we just had question marks for half the roster, these polls are all over the place until they can start echo-chambering each other.