ADVERTISEMENT

Was Cal right about Perry and maybe Noah?

I think Perrys done a pretty good job this year. Needs to cut down on turnovers and defend better, but I think you can contribute that to athletic ability against the competition. Not sure what some were expecting from a freshman Travis Perry against a loaded, veteran SEC.
Maybe he could be similar to Roger Harden or best case scenario, like Travis Ford?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rivercatinfl
I am not beating up on Perry and Noah has shown some overall skills. However, I will admit I am so disappointed in Perry. This is the historic leading scorer in Kentucky High School basketball history. Won the preseason 3 point contest. In fact, there were several experts (not people here) on Youtube and other media saying he was a real talent. He also seemed slightly better in offense that Reed which made it ever more exciting a prospect to see. I don't know if it is psychological or he just isn't aggressive or is simply not at the level expected but it is hard to debate he is no Reed Sheppard or outstanding compared with many other Freshman for other teams.

Noah I think has done a little better but is he better than other Freshman for other teams? You can't have players who are not better than their opponents and expect to win.

I know many here, perhaps including me, hope they will develop. But, in the world of college basketball in today's game you have to have players who impact if you want to win. Perry, Noah, and Chandler the highest rated of the 3) are certainly not striking fear or causing coaches to come up with a game plan to stop them.

We knew already that Cal would not have recruited either Kentucky player other than if forced to have Perry to sit on the bench. I am no Cal fan any longer but was he right in this one?
If we are not going to raise some big time nil money for two to three elite players a year. Than we will have to rely on non burger boys to stick around and develop ,hope that works out . Alot on here seem to overwhelmingly not want elite 1 to 2 year players anymore . I hope I am wrong, but if fanbases don't adapt to the new nil environment we will take a hit in the hardware brought home, and the win and loss column . You have to have a couple of these elite players to mix in with local and transfer talent . Go cats
 
Perry is basically a backup 2G imo. It can work because he can shoot, and has basketball instincts, despite his size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: megablue
You do realize Cal signed Perry right? Give Noah a couple of years and I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.
This will be the future at Kentucky if fans don't support nil no way around it . You can't win big year in and year out without some eliteness on your team . If you're complaining about the talent level and complaining about nil then you better go play some pickle ball fishing or shopping reading a good book etc..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Zissou87
They do not fit Cal's system or style of play. They are not super athletic and struggle on defense because of it. Cal wasn't wrong, but that doesn't mean they are wrong for Pope. They have filled in and helped us win a few games we would have lost due to injuries. They haven't played like superstar freshmen in most our games, but I don't consider them as the reason we lost games. They should not have had to play starter minutes and are more or less house money. They give us something else to root for within the game. It's been fun.
If Kentucky has to depend on these two players for next season, we are in a world of hurt.
 
They are FRESHMEN ! Can't understand why some cannot understand this. Going from HS to College is a big jump for most kids. They will be much better next year. Experience is a great teacher.
Do you expect them to mysteriously become much faster/quicker than they are currently? I for one don't see it. I am not sure if Collins is going to pan out either, but he has a better chance than the other two.
 
They will be valuable off the bench IMO. Get those guys some additional strength training and improved speed and they will be capable in those roles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ala_kat2
These 2 will improve dramatically when they mature. Both are young physically. Maturity will help them immensely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ala_kat2
Yes, he was right about both players, unfortunately.
Yes, he was. Cal was right to offer Perry and he did. And kept going to Perry’s games even after he committed.

He was right to not chase Noah. We didn’t have room for him and he is not right for a Cal team.

But Cal is not here and Noah looks like a perfect Pope player.

I think he should be playing more now. I would have played him in Robinson’s place when he got hurt.

Between the two I think now that Noah is going to be the better college player.
 
I am not beating up on Perry and Noah has shown some overall skills. However, I will admit I am so disappointed in Perry. This is the historic leading scorer in Kentucky High School basketball history. Won the preseason 3 point contest. In fact, there were several experts (not people here) on Youtube and other media saying he was a real talent. He also seemed slightly better in offense that Reed which made it ever more exciting a prospect to see. I don't know if it is psychological or he just isn't aggressive or is simply not at the level expected but it is hard to debate he is no Reed Sheppard or outstanding compared with many other Freshman for other teams.

Noah I think has done a little better but is he better than other Freshman for other teams? You can't have players who are not better than their opponents and expect to win.

I know many here, perhaps including me, hope they will develop. But, in the world of college basketball in today's game you have to have players who impact if you want to win. Perry, Noah, and Chandler the highest rated of the 3) are certainly not striking fear or causing coaches to come up with a game plan to stop them.

We knew already that Cal would not have recruited either Kentucky player other than if forced to have Perry to sit on the bench. I am no Cal fan any longer but was he right in this one?
Not sure what you were expecting, but Perry was never going to be another Shepherd. He never had the athleticism Shepherd has. Competition matters when you are scoring that many points and he just didn’t play the athletes he is seeing right now. He will get better, but barring a miraculous, communist style steroidal transformation, he is never going to be a successful P5 starting PG. That doesn’t mean he can’t be a Kerr+ type backup.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ala_kat2
I am not beating up on Perry and Noah has shown some overall skills. However, I will admit I am so disappointed in Perry. This is the historic leading scorer in Kentucky High School basketball history. Won the preseason 3 point contest. In fact, there were several experts (not people here) on Youtube and other media saying he was a real talent. He also seemed slightly better in offense that Reed which made it ever more exciting a prospect to see. I don't know if it is psychological or he just isn't aggressive or is simply not at the level expected but it is hard to debate he is no Reed Sheppard or outstanding compared with many other Freshman for other teams.

Noah I think has done a little better but is he better than other Freshman for other teams? You can't have players who are not better than their opponents and expect to win.

I know many here, perhaps including me, hope they will develop. But, in the world of college basketball in today's game you have to have players who impact if you want to win. Perry, Noah, and Chandler the highest rated of the 3) are certainly not striking fear or causing coaches to come up with a game plan to stop them.

We knew already that Cal would not have recruited either Kentucky player other than if forced to have Perry to sit on the bench. I am no Cal fan any longer but was he right in this one?
Who's Cal?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jeffky
I played against Ravi and coached against Dominique. They’re both better than Moss and Hawkins were as freshmen, heck even as sophomores.
Way different skill sets. Ravi and Dominique were way better defenders and penetrators. Both are related to their abundantly better athleticism.

Noah and Perry are better shooters and have better basketball instincts, especially Noah. The jury is still out on Noah and Perry being successful as hardwork can do wonders. Both need tons of it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Blue_2_the_bone
Way different skill sets. Ravi and Dominique were way better defenders and penetrators. Both are related to their abundantly better athleticism.

Noah and Perry are better shooters and have better basketball instincts, especially Noah. The jury is still out on Noah and Perry being successful hardwork can do wonders. Both need tons of it.
As much as I love nostalgia, they weren’t defenders or penetrators as freshmen though. Not even as sophomores. I was pleasantly surprised their Jr years as I worried they may not pan out as contributors. Noah’s physicality & rebounding are way ahead of where they both were. It’s easy to have revisionist history about guys who played so many years ago and remember them for how they ended rather than how they started. I remember them well since I had firsthand experience with both guys in different capacities.
 
As much as I love nostalgia, they weren’t defenders or penetrators as freshmen though. Not even as sophomores. I was pleasantly surprised their Jr years as I worried they may not pan out as contributors. Noah’s physicality & rebounding are way ahead of where they both were. It’s easy to have revisionist history about guys who played so many years ago and remember them for how they ended rather than how they started. I remember them well since I had firsthand experience with both guys in different capacities.
Yep it would be like when people talk about Immanuel Quickley people remember the 2020 season more than the 2019 version. Sometimes it takes awhile before you see the talent develop. Are Perry and Noah top-shelf athletes? No. But you don’t always have to be a top shelf athlete to be a good basketball player. Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Nikola Jokic and John Stockton are hall of fame NBA players and none of those were super athletes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue_2_the_bone
Yep it would be like when people talk about Immanuel Quickley people remember the 2020 season more than the 2019 version. Sometimes it takes awhile before you see the talent develop. Are Perry and Noah top-shelf athletes? No. But you don’t always have to be a top shelf athlete to be a good basketball player. Steve Nash, Dirk Nowitzki, Nikola Jokic and John Stockton are hall of fame NBA players and none of those were super athletes.
Exactly. They may never be All-SEC caliber players but they can eventually be solid contributors. Both have the work ethic, IQ, & skill set to be valuable. I don’t think anyone should write them off based on their first year with a team full of seasoned players in a historically good conference. A few years of conditioning, agility work, & strength training will completely change guys who have their work ethic.
 
Do you expect them to mysteriously become much faster/quicker than they are currently? I for one don't see it. I am not sure if Collins is going to pan out either, but he has a better chance than the other two.
They can hit the weight room over the summer and improve their strength a lot. May make them a little faster. Only time will tell.
 
I think you're wrong about Noah, respectfully. I think he has the size and motor to be a fine SEC player as a junior and senior. I see some Padgett about him. Noah may never be a starter at Kentucky, but I can see him being a great 6 or 7th guy on a really good team. He's not great at anything, but he'll bang, normally hits some shots, nice IQ, and has a good motor. You want all of that for a bench/role guy.
Noah does the little things that don’t show up in the stats but every team needs someone like him.
 
I am not beating up on Perry and Noah has shown some overall skills. However, I will admit I am so disappointed in Perry. This is the historic leading scorer in Kentucky High School basketball history. Won the preseason 3 point contest. In fact, there were several experts (not people here) on Youtube and other media saying he was a real talent. He also seemed slightly better in offense that Reed which made it ever more exciting a prospect to see. I don't know if it is psychological or he just isn't aggressive or is simply not at the level expected but it is hard to debate he is no Reed Sheppard or outstanding compared with many other Freshman for other teams.

Noah I think has done a little better but is he better than other Freshman for other teams? You can't have players who are not better than their opponents and expect to win.

I know many here, perhaps including me, hope they will develop. But, in the world of college basketball in today's game you have to have players who impact if you want to win. Perry, Noah, and Chandler the highest rated of the 3) are certainly not striking fear or causing coaches to come up with a game plan to stop them.

We knew already that Cal would not have recruited either Kentucky player other than if forced to have Perry to sit on the bench. I am no Cal fan any longer but was he right in this one?
Hard to debate that he’s no reed Shepard? You think? Lol. They aren’t even in the same ball park.
 
We are used to five star freshman rammed down our throat with Cal. Whether they performed or not they got a big leash. Now we have four year kids recruited being forced into action and we expect five star results and early round exits. We still need good players, but stupid for UK not to use all scholarships and let these kids play here. Noah took something like 150 photos with fans at the 13th regional tournament this week. Pope choosing these kids has brought the Kentucky fans back together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rivercatinfl
I am not beating up on Perry and Noah has shown some overall skills. However, I will admit I am so disappointed in Perry. This is the historic leading scorer in Kentucky High School basketball history. Won the preseason 3 point contest. In fact, there were several experts (not people here) on Youtube and other media saying he was a real talent. He also seemed slightly better in offense that Reed which made it ever more exciting a prospect to see. I don't know if it is psychological or he just isn't aggressive or is simply not at the level expected but it is hard to debate he is no Reed Sheppard or outstanding compared with many other Freshman for other teams.

Noah I think has done a little better but is he better than other Freshman for other teams? You can't have players who are not better than their opponents and expect to win.

I know many here, perhaps including me, hope they will develop. But, in the world of college basketball in today's game you have to have players who impact if you want to win. Perry, Noah, and Chandler the highest rated of the 3) are certainly not striking fear or causing coaches to come up with a game plan to stop them.

We knew already that Cal would not have recruited either Kentucky player other than if forced to have Perry to sit on the bench. I am no Cal fan any longer but was he right in this one?
yes, he was right in the fact that they were not top 10 recruits and that it would take them some time to develop
something he had no interest in waiting for/and/or doing
most UK fans are intelligent enough to understand this
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatguy87
In the age of NIL, roster optimization isn't just limited to roster space.

If Perry and Noah are both relatively cheap, we get pretty good bang for our buck.

We have to fill out a roster with price considerations. We aren't going to have it filled with fantastic college players 1-12.

Kentucky kids who probably aren't terribly expensive that have a chance to develop over the years might be free money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catben and UK90
That run we made in the first half with the freshmen in after we were struggling to score sure solidified they’ll never contribute. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: ala_kat2
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT