Call also had one of the great recruiting classes of all time which he brought with him plus guys like Miller already on roster, hardly the situation Pope found himself in when he arrived. Your comparison is complete horse shitCal did…
So Pope can’t recruit better? Sounds like a problem.Call also had one of the great recruiting classes of all time which he brought with him plus guys like Miller already on roster, hardly the situation Pope found himself in when he arrived. Your comparison is complete horse shit
He wasn't here to recruit for this season you moron. All recruits were already taken before he was hired. What a trollSo Pope can’t recruit better? Sounds like a problem.
As you said earlier, he could have recruited better at BYU and brought those guys with him…He wasn't here to recruit for this season you moron. All recruits were already taken before he was hired. What a troll
I’m not as concerned with him being nice to players. Both him and Cal seem to think we can play defense the RIGHT way. Without fouling like they play in the league.I agree, the nice guy stuff only goes so far. I want to see intensity and stop treating these players like babies. Not sure if Pope can do that though
That's an astute point. It's something I've said for years. Not just Cal and Pope. Most every UK coach. It's not that they aren't cheating. It's that the other teams in the SEC coach to play in the SEC to SEC officials. They aren't doing anything post season anyway. So they just want to play SEC basketball to bide their time to spring football. Avery Johnson was an exception at Alabama. He didn't coach to play with SEC officials and he was ousted.I’m not as concerned with him being nice to players. Both him and Cal seem to think we can play defense the RIGHT way. Without fouling like they play in the league.
Our opponents are taught by the coaches to put their hands all over who they are guarding. Foul 10 times a possession. It’s insane to say but you must cheat to win anything in the SEC.
Recruiting.. Cheat
Signals…. Cheat
Defense… foul, can’t call them all.
Both CMP and Cal have wanted to win without cheating.
If his defensive efficiency rating doesn't improve, it might be a short-lived experience as coach here. Yes, high octane offense is fun to watch, but that's not primarily what UK fans want.I didn't go through every post to see if this is a repeat. I watched a podcast that in Popes 9 years of being a head coach, 50th was the highest defensive efficiency rating in the 9 years, and most years it hovered around 100, except for this year it's 199. Biggest concern going forward it sounds like Pope has never been a defensive minded coach. Can he change?
Yeah, that’s the troubling part. I’d like to think this year’s defensive woes are just a one off exception, but the truth is that for his entire career the story of Pope’s teams has basically been the same: good offense, bad defense.I didn't go through every post to see if this is a repeat. I watched a podcast that in Popes 9 years of being a head coach, 50th was the highest defensive efficiency rating in the 9 years, and most years it hovered around 100, except for this year it's 199. Biggest concern going forward it sounds like Pope has never been a defensive minded coach. Can he change?
How did we defend so well against UT? Did he coach differently?I also believe this is the reason for the lackluster defensive performances that has plagued this team, and why this team has been called soft!
Pope better learn how to balance grace and getting pissed off, and soon, or he’s going to find out that high stakes D1 CBB coaching might not be what was displayed in the brochure!
There is one rebuttal to the offensive approach. Nate Oats went to the final 4 last year and Alabama defensive efficiency was 100.Yeah, that’s the troubling part. I’d like to think this year’s defensive woes are just a one off exception, but the truth is that for his entire career the story of Pope’s teams has basically been the same: good offense, bad defense.
I love the good offense part, but he’s gonna have to make some changes to his defensive approach.
So you are saying the guys he could recruit at BYU were good enough to bring to UK. You don't seem to think much of UK do you,DO YOUAs you said earlier, he could have recruited better at BYU and brought those guys with him…
The 2014 team defending like this enroute to the title gameThere is one rebuttal to the offensive approach. Nate Oats went to the final 4 last year and Alabama defensive efficiency was 100.
If his defensive efficiency rating doesn't improve, it might be a short-lived experience as coach here. Yes, high octane offense is fun to watch, but that's not primarily what UK fans want.
There is one rebuttal to the offensive approach. Nate Oats went to the final 4 last year and Alabama defensive efficiency was 100.
Looks like the NBA, really. A team will will 124-113 one night, then turn around and lose 133-119 the next. And most of the players could care less if they won or lost...Yeah I actually thought about this a lot today.
For so long we all were wanting Cal to play a different style of offense. Take more threes, play a more exciting brand of basketball. And in the last year, he finally did that. And the same this year under Pope.
But a part of me can't help but think that's part of the problem. The guys that make the offense run the last two seasons also happen to be the biggest liabilities on defense.
There needs to be some balance here. Or else our seasons will end poorly.
I agree with this. But when you point any of this out you’re labeled a troll or told to go cheer for the team in Fayetteville.Yeah, that’s the troubling part. I’d like to think this year’s defensive woes are just a one off exception, but the truth is that for his entire career the story of Pope’s teams has basically been the same: good offense, bad defense.
I love the good offense part, but he’s gonna have to make some changes to his defensive approach.
Nate Oats is weird. Seriously, I have no idea if he's a decent defensive coach or not.
114th
3rd
92nd
3rd
111th
40th
I don't know exactly what to make of that LOL.
Oh why couldnt he have recruited better, maybe they were a mid major until last year and last years recruiting cycle was already chosen their schools before Pope made huge Big 12 wins to prove himself in a big boy conference.As you said earlier, he could have recruited better at BYU and brought those guys with him…
BYU could be a bit of a special case given their religious aspect.As you said earlier, he could have recruited better at BYU and brought those guys with him…
You’d have to ask him. Clearly something changed.How did we defend so well against UT? Did he coach differently?
Do you think Memphis was some powerhouse before Cal got there?So you are saying the guys he could recruit at BYU were good enough to bring to UK. You don't seem to think much of UK do you,DO YOU
This is the most apt post I've seen, given the title of the thread assigned by the OP. I have no "concern with Pope", with respect to the prospects for the U.K. basketball program, moving forward. And, to be honest ... I'm not terribly concerned about this aspect of the situation, either. It pleases me to no end that Pope is an immensely smart guy - just as a matter of raw intellect. I'll never worry about whether Pope is "smart enough" to figure anything out ... including the need to, and how to, protect his own health and the well-being of his family against the unreasonable expectations of U.K. basketball fans, generally - and from the monumentally outrageous expectations of many on this board, in particular !My biggest concern is pope's health because of his work ethic plus the pressure of being the uk coach. I say we start a petition to force pope and his family go to a hawaiian beach every summer for 2 weeks minus his cell phone.
I don't doubt that Pope is highly-intelligent and plenty "smart enough" to figure things out, but I cannot understand his seeming lack of emphasis on defense throughout his career. It appears his approach has been far too offense-centric, but I could be wrong. More has to go right for you to be highly-successful with one-dimensional schematics, it seems to be. GO CATS !!This is the most apt post I've seen, given the title of the thread assigned by the OP. I have no "concern with Pope", with respect to the prospects for the U.K. basketball program, moving forward. And, to be honest ... I'm not terribly concerned about this aspect of the situation, either. It pleases me to no end that Pope is an immensely smart guy - just as a matter of raw intellect. I'll never worry about whether Pope is "smart enough" to figure anything out ... including the need to, and how to, protect his own health and the well-being of his family against the unreasonable expectations of U.K. basketball fans, generally - and from the monumentally outrageous expectations of many on this board, in particular !
And with that said ... Go 'Cats ! ! !
He just needs high level talent at PF and C positions in addition to a PG from the portal. He will win big with better higher caliber players. May sound like a "duh" but that's the next hurdle.Oh why couldnt he have recruited better, maybe they were a mid major until last year and last years recruiting cycle was already chosen their schools before Pope made huge Big 12 wins to prove himself in a big boy conference.
His recruiting class for next year is pretty damn good, two top 25 and the other top 30.